The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Washington (AFP) – Janet Yellen passed a key hurdle Thursday on her way to take the helm of the US Federal Reserve when she earned the endorsement of the Senate Banking Committee.

President Barack Obama’s pick to replace Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke now needs approval of the Senate, a near-certainty especially after a deeply controversial rules change on vetting White House nominees by Democrats.

The rules change removes the opportunity for Republicans to block nominations if they cannot garner the support of at least 60 of the 100 senators. Now a simple majority will suffice, making it unnecessary for Yellen to get the backing of at least five Republicans.

Three Republicans joined 11 Democrats in the banking committee’s 14-8 vote for Yellen, who breezed through a confirmation hearing with the panel last week.

Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren, a key financial institution watchdog in Congress, hailed Yellen as an “extraordinarily qualified woman” for the post and expressed surprise that eight on the committee had voted against her.

“Janet Yellen has impeccable credentials, and I’m very pleased she was voted out of committee with bipartisan backing,” said Warren. “I hope the Senate will act swiftly to confirm her so she can get to work leading the Fed at this important time.”

If approved, Yellen, currently the Fed’s vice chair, would become the first woman to lead the world’s most powerful central bank.

At 67, she has built a strong reputation as an academic economist, teaching at the University of California at Berkeley, and as a veteran policymaker at the central bank.

Married to economics Nobel Prize winner George Akerlof, she has a long-term interest in the impact of joblessness on the economy, and has helped keep Fed policy focused on bringing down the unemployment rate.

She has also been closely identified with the Fed’s opening up of its once-mysterious policy thinking, with the central bank communicating what it sees in the economy and the expected direction of monetary policy far more openly than 10 years ago.

In that she has been closely allied to Bernanke, who is stepping down after eight years as Fed chairman, during which he played a crucial role in rescuing the economy from the financial crisis of 2008.

In the confirmation hearing last week, she made clear she would not break from the stimulus policies put in place by Bernanke to get the U.S. economy into higher gear in the wake of the 2008-2009 recession.

But a number of Republican senators raised questions about the risks of the Fed’s ultra-low interest rate and the multi-trillion dollar pile of assets it has piled up as a result of its ongoing quantitative easing stimulus program.

Michael Crapo, the committee’s top Republican, said he voted against Yellen because of her support for the stimulus, now purchasing assets at a pace of $85 billion a month.

“The long-term costs of these policies are unclear and worrisome,” he said.

A full Senate vote on her nomination was expected to be scheduled for early December, and with Democrats holding a majority in the body, approval appeared certain.

However, it was not yet clear how furious Republicans would react to the rules change decided Thursday after Yellen’s nomination clearly the banking committee.

Prior to the rules change, at least five Republicans had said they would vote for Yellen.

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, left, and former President Donald Trump.

Photo by Kevin McCarthy (Public domain)

In the professional stratum of politics, few verities are treated with more reverence than the outcome of next year's midterm, when the Republican Party is deemed certain to recapture majorities in the House and Senate. With weary wisdom, any pol or pundit will cite the long string of elections that buttress this prediction.

Political history also tells us that many factors can influence an electoral result, including a national crisis or a change in economic conditions — in other words, things can change and even midterm elections are not entirely foretold. There have been a few exceptions to this rule, too.

Keep reading... Show less