The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

The revival of former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich’s presidential bid crystallized Sunday when he received the front-page endorsement of the most influential conservative newspaper in New Hampshire, the first-in-the-nation primary state and a must-win for frontrunner and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney.

“We are in critical need of the innovative, forward-looking strategy and positive leadership that Gingrich has shown he is capable of providing,” reads the editorial in the Union Leader, which also includes jabs at Romney’s reputation for flip-flopping and lacking a core.

“We don’t back candidates based on popularity polls or big-shot backers. We look for conservatives of courage and conviction who are independent-minded, grounded in their core beliefs about this nation and its people, and best equipped for the job.”

Gingrich is set to enjoy a continued flood of free media in the coming days, many of them glowing press accounts that revel in the drama of his candidacy, one that was written-off when most of his campaign staff quit over the summer. The former Speaker’s poll numbers have bounced back in recent weeks, largely on the strength of his seasoned disposition, a relatively steady command of the issues, and a perception among Republican activists that he has the mettle to debate Barack Obama next fall.

Supporters of the resurgent Gingrich will no doubt point to John McCain’s back-from-the-dead New Hampshire win in 2008. He, too, had to contend with an exodus of key campaign staff in 2007, only to earn the Union Leader endorsement and roar back to win the state’s primary and eventually his party’s presidential nomination. And the newspaper’s backing, as Nate Silver shows, has historically been a leading indicator of the success of Republican hopefuls.

What we do not yet know is whether the largest newspaper in the Granite State will choose to run a sustained campaign in favor of Gingrich (and more important, against Mitt Romney — as it did in scathing editorials throughout late 2007 and early 2008 after having given the nod to McCain).

In any case, the backing of a respected conservative institution gives Gingrich an opportunity to coalesce the leftover segments of the Republican establishment (and grassroots activists) who for at least a year have been desperately seeking out someone — anyone — with solid conservative credentials and a combative demeanor (read: not Mitt Romney) to make Barack Obama a one-term president.


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Supreme Court of the United States

YouTube Screenshot

A new analysis is explaining the disturbing circumstances surrounding the overturning of Roe v. Wade and how the U.S. Supreme Court has morphed into an entity actively working toward authoritarianism.

In a new op-ed published by The Guardian, Jill Filipovic —author of the book, The H-Spot: The Feminist Pursuit of Happiness—offered an assessment of the message being sent with the Supreme Court's rollback of the 1973 landmark ruling.

Keep reading... Show less


YouTube Screenshot

After a year of reporting on the tax machinations of the ultrawealthy, ProPublica spotlights the top tax-avoidance techniques that provide massive benefits to billionaires.

Last June, drawing on the largest trove of confidential American tax data that’s ever been obtained, ProPublica launched a series of stories documenting the key ways the ultrawealthy avoid taxes, strategies that are largely unavailable to most taxpayers. To mark the first anniversary of the launch, we decided to assemble a quick summary of the techniques — all of which can generate tax savings on a massive scale — revealed in the series.

1. The Ultra Wealth Effect

Our first story unraveled how billionaires like Elon Musk, Warren Buffett and Jeff Bezos were able to amass some of the largest fortunes in history while paying remarkably little tax relative to their immense wealth. They did it in part by avoiding selling off their vast holdings of stock. The U.S. system taxes income. Selling stock generates income, so they avoid income as the system defines it. Meanwhile, billionaires can tap into their wealth by borrowing against it. And borrowing isn’t taxable. (Buffett said he followed the law and preferred that his wealth go to charity; the others didn’t comment beyond a “?” from Musk.)

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}