The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from Shareblue.


Ivanka Trump wants the world to know that the family separation policy her father unilaterally imposed on immigrants was a “low point” for her. Throughout the implementation of the policy, Ivanka Trump remained silent, even as images, stories, and audio emerged of children and families under duress thanks to her father’s decisions emerged.

The comments are once again an attempt by Trump’s eldest child to sidestep complicity in his racist and bigoted administration while continuing to wield power and influence at taxpayer expense as a senior White House aide.

Speaking at an event held by Axios, Ivanka Trump was asked if family separations were a  “low point” in her time working at the White House.

She said “it was a low point,” adding, “I feel very strongly about that and I am very vehemently against family separation and the separation of parents and children.”

While Ivanka Trump used “was” to describe the family separation issue, it is not in the past. The federal government is still holding on to hundreds of children that were separated from their parents. The crisis is ongoing.

She went on to describe herself as “a daughter of an immigrant” (her mother, Ivana Trump, was born in the Czech Republic), called immigration a “difficult issue” and lamented “incentivizing behavior that puts children at risk.” In other words, she believes the policy is justified if it stops migrants from coming to the U.S.

Her father put children at risk by taking them away from their families.

Until these remarks, she has not made any public statements opposing her father’s policies. Even in this instance, she did not specify her father’s role in setting events into motion.

Trump bucked presidential tradition and chose to prosecute all border crossers, which triggered the separations – which included taking infants and toddlers from their parents.

Throughout the ordeal, which is still ongoing, Ivanka Trump was complicit. She did not speak out, she did not use her considerable national and international platform that can reach millions to make her views known.

Instead, she remained silent and has continued to reap the benefits of her access to the presidency.

Yet the Trump family has claimed that Ivanka Trump has the power to influence her father’s decisions. According to her brother Eric, “she has influence” and compelled Trump to launch air strikes against Syria and their alleged use of chemical weapons by telling her father, “listen, this is horrible stuff.”

But when “horrible stuff” happened thanks to Trump’s own racist and xenophobic motivations and families were ripped to pieces, Ivanka didn’t do anything.

She remains complicit.

Published with permission of The American Independent.


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Herschel Walker

Former football star Herschel Walker has attracted a large following as a commentator over the last decade, carefully crafting an image as an upstanding Black American with a focus on conservative “family values.” So when news broke last week of Walker having a 10-year-old child whom he did not raise, the Georgia Republican Senate candidate's detractors began hammering on the contradictions between his moralizing speeches and his own life.

Walker has made his stance against fatherless households a key component of his personal political brand. In a 2020 interview, he said the Black community has a “major, major problem” with fatherless homes.

Keep reading... Show less

Rep. Lauren Boebert

YouTube Screenshot

For far-right Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado, owning a gun-themed restaurant called Shooters Grill has been a major promotional tool among fellow MAGA Republicans and members of the National Rifle Association (NRA). But according to Daily Beast reporter Roger Sollenberger, Boebert’s promotional tool may be in trouble: Sollenberger reports that Boebert’s restaurant is “facing an uncertain” future now that the new landlord of the property she has been renting has announced that he won’t be renewing her lease.

In an article published by the Beast on June 23, Sollenberger describes the property’s new landlord as a “marijuana retailer.”

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}