The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from Shareblue.


Shocking evidence has emerged that the Trump administration tricked immigrant parents into giving up their children, and that hundreds of parents were deported without being given a choice of whether to leave their children behind.

New court documents on behalf of separated migrant families show a pattern of immigration officials misleading or pressuring parents into signing away their rights to be reunified with their children, Buzzfeed reports:

The declarations from attorneys working with detained parents who were separated from their kids describe people who don’t speak English being pressured into signing documents; being forced to make a decision in a room full of dozens of people with only a few minutes to decide whether to leave their kids in the US; or incorrectly believing they were signing a form that would reunite them with their children.

In one instance, a Guatemalan man was told to sign documents that he was led to believe would allow his daughter to stay in America, which would protect her from criminals in his home country who had threatened to “buy” her.

However, the man did not understand the document waived his parental rights, and had only about a minute to consider the paper.

The Trump administration has acknowledged that 463 parents have been deported while their children remain in U.S. custody.

Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen claimed that all of those parents had been given a choice of whether to leave their children behind when they were deported.

But Nielsen lied, as a U.S. official effectively admitted to Politico. As many as three quarters of those parents may have been separated from their children without consent, the official said.

The Trump administration failed to document whether about 350 parents were informed about their options regarding their children.

Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar also lied about parents supposedly choosing to leave their children behind.

These children were stolen from their families, and the lies and deceptions of the Trump administration is only coming to light thanks to court filings and lawsuits from groups like the ACLU.

Trump’s brutal decision to criminally prosecute all border crossers, which triggered mandatory family separation, has already inflicted untold cruelty and trauma on parents and children.

We now know that despite a court order, the Trump administration has still failed to return hundreds of children who were stolen from their families.

Many of these families may never be reunited — and hundreds were either lied to about this fact, or given no choice in the matter.

The Trump team lied to these parents, stole their children, and tried to keep the details away from the public.

The ugly truth has now been exposed.

Published with permission of The American Independent. 

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

A scene from "Squid Game" on Netflix

Reprinted with permission from Responsible Statecraft

The Treasury Department's nine-page "2021 Sanctions Review" released on Monday makes vague recommendations for "calibrating sanctions to mitigate unintended economic, political, and humanitarian impact." Unfortunately, it offers few tangible policy suggestions on how to end the high humanitarian
Keep reading... Show less


Reprinted with permission from Creators

In New York City, a statue of Thomas Jefferson has graced the City Council chamber for 100 years. This week, the Public Design Commission voted unanimously to remove it. "Jefferson embodies some of the most shameful parts of our country's history," explained Adrienne Adams, a councilwoman from Queens. Assemblyman Charles Barron went even further. Responding to a question about where the statue should go next, he was contemptuous: "I don't think it should go anywhere. I don't think it should exist."

When iconoclasts topple Jefferson, they seem to validate the argument advanced by defenders of Confederate monuments that there is no escape from the slippery slope. "First, they come for Nathan Bedford Forrest and then for Robert E. Lee. Where does it end? Is Jefferson next? Is George Washington?"

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}