The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Congratulations, America.

We seem to be moving beyond the need for the perfect victim. We no longer require a bruised and bloodied virginal innocent to make us believe that sexual assault and domestic violence occur at astounding rates in the U.S.

Significant steps are beginning to be made toward preventing assaults and trying more cases. More importantly, we are asking ourselves why it took us so long to reach this crucial level of understanding.

We may see evidence of this hard-won and long overdue evolution in the scandals surround the NFL and Rolling Stone magazine.

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell recently issued more stringent standards for dealing with alleged sexual assaults and domestic violence by the league’s players. The changes were unanimously approved by the NFL owners on Wednesday.

We all know Goodell did not come to this place of understanding easily.

It took massive public outrage at the two-game suspension initially slapped on former Baltimore Ravens running back Ray Rice — the equivalent of a child’s timeout in the corner — after video went public of him dragging his then-girlfriend (now wife) out of a hotel elevator.

The sheer volume of outrage forced Goodell and the league’s owners to take domestic violence seriously — to recognize it as their problem. The public understood that, even before video of Rice making the punch emerged.

After weeks of hot media attention, Rice seems to be wriggling off the hook. In recent weeks, his penalty of indefinite suspension was reversed through arbitration. And his wife has come forward with her version of that night — a retelling that downplays her role as a supposed victim of domestic violence.

Still, nobody needs Janay Rice to volunteer as poster woman for domestic violence. We all know it’s a problem in the NFL, and in society, and we can no longer look the other way. Increasingly, fans are unwilling to support a league unfettered by reckless, violent and possibly criminal behavior off the field by players.

As for Rolling Stone, it offered up a snapshot of society’s attitudes toward sexual violence, but not in the way it had intended. In November it published a harrowing account of gang rape and bureaucratic bumbling over that rape at the University of Virginia. As the story lit up the Internet, details soon emerged showing inaccuracies and disregard for reporting standards. No fraternity event was held on the night she claims she was attacked by seven members of Phi Kappa Psi, among other discrepancies.

As the story imploded and Rolling Stone editors backpedaled and apologized, many feared the controversy would taint the credibility of other campus sexual assault claims, making young women less willing to come forward if attacked.

The University of Virginia’s president, Teresa A. Sullivan, could have cited the apparently shoddy journalism at Rolling Stone as vindication. But she didn’t. As the story unraveled, she was quoted saying that the school was “more focused than ever.” “We will continue to take a hard look at our practices, policies and procedures,” she told the New York Times.

The university has to because it is being watched by a public increasingly more aware of the scope of campus sexual assault, just as the NFL will be scrutinized.

The Rolling Stone story didn’t hinge entirely on the supposed victim’s questionable narrative of her attack. It also outlined the patterns of how such cases typically get handled, showing that victims can be inadvertently influenced not to report. And those problems exist at other campuses as well.

Despite the scandal, the Rolling Stone story nonetheless has stimulated valuable discussion. For perspective, realize that it was only in January that President Barack Obama became the first U.S. president to squarely address campus sexual assaults when he created a task force to study the problem and issued guidelines for universities.

The Department of Education has been investigating more than 80 campuses for their policies and procedures. Congress stepped up as well, with significant work done on the issue before the Campus Accountability and Safety Act was introduced in the U.S. Senate in July.

The significance of these events — all of which occurred in one calendar year — shouldn’t be underplayed. Real progress on changing cultural norms, or moving institutions to reform themselves, only happens when public attention is focused.

Admittedly, journalists are often guilty of sniffing around for the perfect victim, the person whose story is too awful or too sensational for the public to look away.

But at some point, other evidence piles up. And the need for the perfect victim recedes.

Mary Sanchez is an opinion-page columnist for The Kansas City Star. Readers may write to her at: Kansas City Star, 1729 Grand Blvd., Kansas City, MO. 64108-1413, or via email at

AFP Photo/Rob Carr


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Donald Trump

Image via Twitter

A year after former President Donald Trump left the White House and Joe Biden was sworn in as president of the United States, Trump continues to have considerable influence in the Republican Party. Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a former Trump critic turned Trump sycophant, recently told Fox News that having a “working relationship” with Trump must be a litmus test for anyone in a GOP leadership role in Congress. But an NBC News poll, conducted in January 14-18, 2022, finds that many Republican voters identify as Republicans first and Trump supporters second.

Analyzing that poll in the New York Times on January 21, reporters Leah Askarinam and Blake Hounshell, explain, “Buried in a new survey published today is a fascinating nugget that suggests the Republican Party may not be as devoted to Trump as we’ve long assumed. Roughly every month for the last several years, pollsters for NBC News have asked: ‘Do you consider yourself to be more of a supporter of Donald Trump or more of a supporter of the Republican Party?’ Over most of that time, Republicans have replied that they saw themselves as Trump supporters first.”

Keep reading... Show less

Ivanka Trump, right

Image via @Huffington Post

As House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s select committee on the January 6, 2021 insurrection moves along, it is examining Ivanka Trump’s actions that day — especially the former White House senior adviser urging her father, then- President Donald Trump, to call off his supporters when the U.S. Capitol Building was under attack. This week, Ivanka Trump’s importance to the committee is examined in a column by liberal Washington Post opinion writer Greg Sargent and an article by blogger Marcy Wheeler.

Sargent notes that the committee’s “new focus on Ivanka Trump” shows that it “is developing an unexpectedly comprehensive picture of how inextricably linked the violence was to a genuine plot to thwart a legitimately elected government from taking power.”

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}