The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

By Jonathan Tamari, The Philadelphia Inquirer (TNS)

WASHINGTON — Tuesday was seemingly made for Sen. Robert Menendez.

Two of the top priorities of his congressional career — U.S. relations with Iran and Cuba — were pushed to the forefront, each reaching a critical decision point.

But after years of leading on both fronts, Menendez, D-N.J., joined the debate Tuesday from a newly weakened position, having given up his seat as the top Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee as he faces federal corruption charges.

“He’s still there, but his wings are clipped,” said Peter Feaver, who served in national security posts in the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations.

Menendez has been one of Congress’ most influential hawks on Iran and Cuba, bucking the Obama administration on both as he rose to the top of the committee.

“This would have been Menendez’s moment,” Feaver said. “Those two issues have never before been as prominent at the same time … with the opportunity for policy decisions that would have tremendous consequences and set the agenda for a decade or more to come.”

Ironically, key moves involving both countries arrived Tuesday during Menendez’s first Foreign Relations hearing since returning to rank-and-file status.

On Iran, the committee voted unanimously to advance a bill with his name on it that would give Congress oversight on any final deal between the United States, international powers, and Iran over Tehran’s nuclear program.

While Menendez drafted the measure with the chairman, Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., the final version was negotiated by Corker and Sen. Benjamin Cardin, D-Md., Menendez’s replacement.

As the committee voted on that compromise, the Obama administration announced plans to remove Cuba from the list of state sponsors of terrorism, a move Menendez has ferociously opposed.

Menendez still had a say in each debate — and was lavishly praised by his colleagues for his work — but he no longer has the formal clout that comes with a ranking post.
Before, “he had arguably one of the most important Democratic perches outside of the executive branch” on foreign policy, said Feaver, who teaches at Duke University.

Now that perch belongs to Cardin, who is more closely aligned with the White House on Iran and Cuba.

When the committee filed into the room for its meeting, it was Cardin, not Menendez, who sat immediately to Corker’s left. Then came Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and then Menendez.

The seemingly minor shift visualized the change in a chamber steeped in hierarchy and protocol.
Menendez gave up his post as top Democrat after being charged with accepting lavish gifts in exchange for using his influence to help a campaign donor.

He has said he followed the law and has vowed to be vindicated, but temporarily stepped down so as not to cause a distraction for his party, spokeswoman Patricia Enright wrote in an email.
Menendez, his aides, and other senators said he remains influential.

“I’m playing just about every role I would (have), for all intents and purposes,” Menendez said as reporters mobbed him to ask his take on the Iran bill’s final compromise.

Menendez spoke with both Corker and Cardin as the compromise was made, Enright said, making his input known. And the staff Menendez hired remains on the committee under Cardin, leaving his team with hands-on influence.

Menendez praised the bill that cleared the committee, and had enough fight to jab, “I’ve got to believe that the administration, if they were smart, would embrace this bill.”

Corker, Cardin and others went out of their way to praise Menendez.

Corker opened Tuesday’s meeting by saying, “I can’t imagine a member being more constructive,” and adding that Menendez’s leadership helped make significant legislation possible. (He chaired the Foreign Relations Committee until Republicans took control early this year.)

Cardin said that Menendez deserves “strong thanks” and that he “did not want to become the ranking member under these circumstances.”

He added, “I hope that Senator Menendez’s issues will be resolved very quickly.”
Menendez praised Cardin as a replacement.

Later, the son of Cuban immigrants blasted Obama’s decision to remove Cuba from the list of sponsors of terrorism, saying it “sends the wrong message.”

Cardin, though, called it “an important step” toward “a more constructive relationship with Cuba.”

Earlier, there was a more subtle sign of the shift in standing.

Asked if he would support the compromise Iran bill, Menendez said, “I have to see the final version, but if it’s as it was explained to me by Senator Cardin, the answer is yes.”

A few weeks ago, the Democrat working out the final version and explaining it to colleagues would have been Menendez.

(c)2015 The Philadelphia Inquirer, Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC

Photo: via Flickr


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Mark Levin

Politico reported Friday that John Eastman, the disgraced ex-law professor who formulated many of former President Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results, was also apparently in communication with Fox News host Mark Levin. The story gets even more interesting from there, revealing the shell game that right-wing media personalities engage in while doubling as political operatives.

A legal filing by Eastman’s attorneys reveals that, among the messages Eastman is still attempting to conceal from the House January 6 committee are 12 pieces of correspondence with an individual matching Levin’s description as “a radio talk show host, is also an attorney, former long-time President (and current board chairman) of a public interest law firm, and also a former fellow at The Claremont Institute.” Other details, including a sloppy attempt to redact an email address, also connect to Levin, who did not respond to Politico’s requests for comment.

Keep reading... Show less

Sen. Wendy Rogers

Youtube Screenshot

There have been powerful indicators of the full-bore radicalization of the Republican Party in the past year: the 100-plus extremist candidates it fielded this year, the apparent takeover of the party apparatus in Oregon, the appearance of Republican officials at white nationalist gatherings. All of those are mostly rough gauges or anecdotal evidence, however; it’s been difficult to get a clear picture of just how deeply the extremism has penetrated the party.

Using social media as a kind of proxy for their real-world outreach—a reasonable approach, since there are few politicians now who don’t use social media—the Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights decided to get a clearer picture of the reach of extremist influences in official halls of power by examining how many elected officials participate in extremist Facebook groups. What it found was deeply troubling: 875 legislators in all 50 states, constituting nearly 22% of all elected GOP lawmakers, identified as participating members of extremist Facebook groups.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}