The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

President Donald Trump’s tweets often set off big gyrations in stock prices. Anyone who knows of the tweets in advance could make a fortune, though not legally.

Who knows of the tweets in advance? Trump knows, and there’s growing speculation that he might be showing tweets in the making to select others in his inner circle. Such suspicions have been bubbling since Election Day 2016, when Trump started attacking specific corporations, causing their stock prices to tank. An investor can make money off a falling stock price as well as a rising one.

NBC’s Howard Fineman opened the floodgates on this troubling discussion with a tweet of his own. “My twitter feed is asking a legitimate question: are @realDonaldTrump’s businesses and family profiting from insider knowledge of his pending — market-moving — tweets, comments and bargaining stands?” he asked. “My guess would be yes.”

Fineman then posed the question on the minds of many: “Who is doing it for him and how?”

Consider the recent theatrics surrounding the tariff threat on Mexico. After the U.S. stock markets closed on May 30, Trump tweeted that “the United States will impose a 5% Tariff on all goods coming into our Country from Mexico, until such time as illegal migrants coming through Mexico, and into our Country, STOP.” Furthermore, the tax could have risen as high as 35 percent.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 354 points the following day, a Friday. Prices for corn, soybeans and other farm commodities swooned.

To most of the business community, the idea of a new accelerated trade war with Mexico was deeply disturbing. It’s still being buffeted over the ongoing trade war with China. By the way, after Trump tweet-threatened to impose a 25 percent tariff on more exports from China last month, the Dow plunged 540 points over the next two trading days.

On June 7, he tweeted, “I am pleased to inform you that The United States of America has reached a signed agreement with Mexico.” Stock prices rose in the following session, but they had already been climbing after June 5, when he tweeted, “Progress is being made” — and Republican senators almost unanimously vowed to stop the tariff nonsense.

As far as we can tell, the deal with Mexico requires the country to take steps it had already agreed to take. (Similarly, the new NAFTA is pretty much same as the old NAFTA.)

We know the plot. The president manufactures a crisis, plays pretend hardball and then backs down, declaring a pretend victory.

That’s the political side of it. But let’s again consider the possibility that Trump has expanded the fun to making quick windfalls by trading on the stocks affected by his tweets.

Insider trading usually involves corporate leaders who buy or sell a stock while possessing material information not disclosed to the public. In an example, an executive might know about the impending loss of a key contract and sell his shares before the investing public knows about it and sends the price down.

The Securities and Exchange Commission can come down hard on violators. Insider trading can draw a maximum prison sentence of 20 years. Insiders try to hide their tracks by setting up buyers and sellers among relatives and other acquaintances.

As of now, there’s no proof that Trump and family have engaged in insider trading. Other presidents have made announcements that move markets, but it’s hard to come up with a single name, other than Trump, that one would suspect of doing it for personal gain. Given the Trumpian history of financial manipulation — and the phony nature of these tweet-driven dramas — one wouldn’t place such activity beyond the realm of possibility. Bets are being taken.

Follow Froma Harrop on Twitter @FromaHarrop. She can be reached at fharrop@gmail.com. To find out more about Froma Harrop and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Web page at www.creators.com.

IMAGE: Traders on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange.

 

 

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Donald Trump, left, and Joe Biden

Photo by Andrea Widburg

America's political media — and especially our "punditocracy" — suffer from myriad defects. They love simple answers and often seem hostile to complexity. They tend to obsess slavishly over the latest polling data. And they suffer from a chronic amnesia that erases not only historical context but even very recent events from their narrow minds.

Marking the end of President Joe Biden's first year in office, the media consensus followed a predictable and familiar framing. After 12 months, with the coronavirus pandemic continuing, his legislative agenda incomplete and his approval ratings in steep decline, Biden was all but declared a failure — with no clear way forward.

Keep reading... Show less

President Joe Biden

At Joe Biden's Wednesday press conference, a reporter cited a list of recent misfortunes before asking mournfully: "Did you overpromise to the American public what you could achieve in your first year in office?"

He might as well have asked Biden, "Have you been sitting at a desk in the Oval Office?" Overpromising is what presidential candidates do. You don't get 81 million votes, as Biden did, or even 74 million, as his opponent did, by informing people of all the problems you won't be able to solve.

Keep reading... Show less
x
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}