The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Outgoing Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen will be remembered for overseeing a grotesquely abusive and horrifying tenure for her department as she drove forward and defended President Donald Trump’s vicious anti-immigrant agenda. But according to a new report from the Daily Beast, she saw herself as one of the more moderate members of the president team.

She clashed most with Trump policy aide and speechwriter Stephen Miller, who once worked for former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, according to the report. While he thought she wasn’t tough enough on immigrants, she apparently saw him as a bigot.

“Miller thought Nielsen was a soft-on-the-border Bushie [as in President George W.] and she thought he was a egomaniacal lunatic who hated brown people,” a former top Trump official told the Daily Beast. “Needless to say, that made for awkward moments in the Oval [Office] and Cabinet Room.”

They added that the pair clearly had a “mutual disgust” for one another.

Under Nielsen, the department has continued a harsh crackdown on immigrants. Most notoriously, it embraced the separation of immigrant families pushed by the Justice Department’s zero-tolerance policy. This has affected a still untold number of kids, inflicting brutal and enduring trauma and subjecting them to abominable conditions. It was a blatant abuse of human rights. And exacerbating the initial harm and wrongdoing, the administration, it has been revealed, has no plan for ever reuniting many of these families. Nielsen has aggressively defended these actions to the public and to Congress — even brashly saying that there was no policy of separating families, when the administration was completely aware that this was the effect and the point of the zero-tolerance push.

But multiple reports have now found that, as horrifying as Nielsen’s tenure at Homeland Security has been, she opposed Trump on other extreme measures. The New York Times reported that Trump told her to bar all immigrants including asylum-seekers from entering at the U.S.-Mexico border, but she refused because it would be against the law.

As some try to defend Nielsen’s outrageous time at Homeland Security and polish her image, it’s important to remember just how bad things have gotten. But it seems that without her, it could get even worse

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Sen. Jeanne Shaheen

Sixteen states vying for the early slots in 2024’s presidential primary calendar pitched their case to the Democratic National Committee onWednesday and Thursday, touting their history, diversity, economies, and electoral competitiveness in the general election.

State party officials, a governor, lt. governors, an attorney general, members of Congress, senior staff and party strategists touted their electorates, industries, heritage, and features that would propel presidential candidates and draw national scrutiny, which pleased the officials on the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee (RBC). But the panel’s leaders also probed whether Republicans in otherwise promising states would seek to impede a revised Democratic primary calendar.

Keep reading... Show less

Supreme Court

YouTube Screenshot

When Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell was confronted over his support for the bipartisan bill addressing elements of gun violence, he defended his Second Amendment record, telling reporters: “I spent my career supporting, defending and expanding” gun rights, and stressing that he had “spent years” confirming conservative judges. McConnell made that statement in full confidence that the Supreme Court he packed with three illegitimate justices would do precisely what it did: ensure that sensible gun regulations anywhere would be eliminated.

The court decided the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen case Thursday in 6-3 decision written by Justice Clarence Thomas, striking down that state’s 108-year-old provision requiring anyone who wants to get a license to carry a concealed handgun outside the home to show “proper cause” before being granted a permit. The Court’s extremists, Thomas writes, find that New York's strict limits on the concealed carry of firearms in public violates the Second Amendment. It essentially throws out the previous restrictions the Court upheld in its last big gun control case, the 2008 District of Columbia v. Heller.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}