The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

By Christi Parsons, Tribune Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON — President Obama said Thursday that he will “make no apologies” for trading five Taliban detainees for the release of Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, defiantly pushing back against critics of the decision by referring to Bergdahl as a “prisoner of war” and as “somebody’s child” who is now headed back into the arms of his family.

“This is not a political football,” Obama said. “You have a couple of parents whose kid volunteered to fight in a distant land who they hadn’t seen in five years and weren’t sure whether they’d ever see again.

“And as commander-in-chief of the United States armed forces, I am responsible for those kids. … I make absolutely no apologies for making sure that we get back a young man to his parents and that the American people understand that this is somebody’s child.”

As Obama has been in Europe meeting with allies for the last three days, the story about Bergdahl has transformed rapidly into a discussion about whether it was worth releasing Taliban fighters in exchange for a soldier who appears to have walked away from his unit voluntarily.

The question of whether to call Bergdahl a prisoner of war is becoming one point of contention, as critics question whether it’s too sympathetic a term. After avoiding the use of it during Bergdahl’s captivity, though, administration officials have embraced it in the days since his Saturday release.

One top Obama adviser said late Thursday that, even though it isn’t technically the accurate term, it is correct in a functional sense.

In using the phrase during a Thursday press conference alongside the British prime minister, Obama sidestepped the legal question of whether a detained combatant in an armed conflict qualifies as a POW even if there hasn’t been a formal declaration of war.

Instead, he doubled down on what the White House sees as the more significant point — that Bergdahl was a member of the U.S. armed forces being held against his will in a conflict zone, and that the country had an obligation to do whatever it could to get him back.

“I’m never surprised by controversies that are whipped up in Washington,” Obama said. “That’s par for the course. But I’ll repeat what I said two days ago. We have a basic principle. We do not leave anybody wearing the American uniform behind.”

“We had a prisoner of war whose health had deteriorated and we were deeply concerned about,” he said. “We saw an opportunity and we seized it. And I make no apologies for that.”

AFP Photo/Saul Loeb

Want the latest on Bowe Bergdahl? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Mark Levin

Politico reported Friday that John Eastman, the disgraced ex-law professor who formulated many of former President Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results, was also apparently in communication with Fox News host Mark Levin. The story gets even more interesting from there, revealing the shell game that right-wing media personalities engage in while doubling as political operatives.

A legal filing by Eastman’s attorneys reveals that, among the messages Eastman is still attempting to conceal from the House January 6 committee are 12 pieces of correspondence with an individual matching Levin’s description as “a radio talk show host, is also an attorney, former long-time President (and current board chairman) of a public interest law firm, and also a former fellow at The Claremont Institute.” Other details, including a sloppy attempt to redact an email address, also connect to Levin, who did not respond to Politico’s requests for comment.

Keep reading... Show less

Sen. Wendy Rogers

Youtube Screenshot

There have been powerful indicators of the full-bore radicalization of the Republican Party in the past year: the 100-plus extremist candidates it fielded this year, the apparent takeover of the party apparatus in Oregon, the appearance of Republican officials at white nationalist gatherings. All of those are mostly rough gauges or anecdotal evidence, however; it’s been difficult to get a clear picture of just how deeply the extremism has penetrated the party.

Using social media as a kind of proxy for their real-world outreach—a reasonable approach, since there are few politicians now who don’t use social media—the Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights decided to get a clearer picture of the reach of extremist influences in official halls of power by examining how many elected officials participate in extremist Facebook groups. What it found was deeply troubling: 875 legislators in all 50 states, constituting nearly 22% of all elected GOP lawmakers, identified as participating members of extremist Facebook groups.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}