The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

By Steve Kraske, The Kansas City Star

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — President Barack Obama feasted on working-class delicacies in Kansas City Tuesday night as he sought to bond with people unaccustomed to having the ear of the most powerful man in the world.

His presidential motorcade steered to Arthur Bryant’s Barbeque shortly after landing at Kansas City International Airport.

Once there, he met with four White House-chosen Kansas Citians over a half-slab of ribs, a Bud Light, and conversation about how what he does in Washington registers in people’s lives.

After picking up the tab, he moved to a corner of the restaurant where he greeted the four, put his hand on Becky Forrest’s arm, and looked her in the eye.

“When,” the president asked, “did you decide to get involved” in a neighborhood association?

That Obama chose to meet with “real people” has become standard operating procedure. He’s done it repeatedly throughout his time in office to connect with everyday citizens. He’s also used such meetings to drive home political issues.

The practice dates back years and through multiple presidencies.

“It endures because when you can put a face to a problem, when you can humanize a problem … it’s a very powerful way of communicating an idea,” said Steve Jacques, a Johnson Countian who performed advance work for Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton.

Steve Glorioso, a longtime Kansas City political consultant who set up events for former Mayor Kay Barnes, said Americans like seeing top leaders connecting with seemingly ordinary people.
“That’s a very difficult thing to do, obviously, with a president,” he said. “They don’t have any other way to do it than to stage it.”

Wednesday, Obama will take the stage in more conventional fashion. He’ll give a speech about the economy to hundreds in the Uptown Theater in a message that will reach tens of thousands more in news reports.

Before arriving in Kansas City, Obama met privately Tuesday with wounded service members at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Md., and spoke to the nation about the crisis in Ukraine. He didn’t arrive at Arthur Bryant’s until nearly 8 p.m.

The White House said it chose those who dined with Obama through letters each had written to the president. Every night, the president is said to read at least 10 notes from Americans.

Forrest, the one Obama addressed first, had written about the work of the Town Fork Creek Neighborhood Association east of the University of Missouri-Kansas City. She wanted the president to know, the White House said, that people in her community were working hard to improve their neighborhood and positively impact the lives of those around them.

Victor Fugate had written to thank the president for help repaying a student loan through the Income-Based Repayment Plan. Through the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, Fugate used an insurance exchange to get health coverage when he was laid off from his job as a financial counselor. He now works for the Missouri Department of Mental Health.

Mark Turner teaches a high school equivalency degree course for the Full Employment Council. The White House said he wrote the president about trying to make a difference in the lives of young people.

The president’s aides noted that the council was among local agencies that received a $1 million U.S. Labor Department grant for educational and job-related services for juvenile offenders and at-risk youth.

Valerie McCaw wrote the president about challenges she faces as a single mother and owner of a small business. She started VSM Engineering 11 years ago and has four part-time employees. She’s struggling, according to the White House, to pay her son’s out-of-state college tuition of almost $40,000 a year.

In a White House video of the president’s spokesman inviting the four to dinner — press secretary Josh Earnest hails from Kansas City — McCaw said she wrote her letter to the president in the middle of the night.

“I can’t work any harder,” she said. “I’ve got to work smarter.”

The meal, and conversation, proceeded after reporters and photographers were ushered out of the restaurant. Obama left the legendary barbecue joint about 9 p.m. and spent the night in a downtown hotel.

Glorioso said the president deserves credit for at least trying to get out of the suffocating bubble that defines an American presidency.

“There are so many filters between a president (and the people), that a president is just overwhelmed,” Glorioso said. “He’s the leader of the free world. With all the things going on in the world right now, to spend an evening talking to people is commendable.”

Republicans didn’t see it that way. They said the president picked an odd time to leave Washington. Missouri Sen. Roy Blunt pointed out that Obama left town with Congress still grappling with bills aimed at improving border security, transportation, and the Veterans Administration health care program.

“The timing could’ve been a little better. … The president’s got the traveling and campaigning part of the job down just right,” he said. “It’s the managing part of the job and the getting-things-done part of the job that appear to be a big question.”

But Democrats say even a somewhat-staged opportunity to break bread with somebody who doesn’t work for the White House, or isn’t engaged in its politics, beats staying bottled up in the White House.

“(Presidents) feel trapped,” said Martin Hamburger, a long-time Democratic political consultant. “It probably does give them perspective.”

AFP Photo/Jewel Samad

Interested in U.S. politics? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Chris Cuomo

News Literacy Week 2022, an annual awareness event started by the News Literacy Project, a nonpartisan nonprofit dedicated to making everyone “smart, active consumers of news and information and equal and engaged participants in a democracy” has closed out. From January 24 to 28, classes, webinars, and Twitter chats taught students and adults how to root out misinformation when consuming news media.
There’s no downplaying the importance of understanding what is accurate in the media. These days, news literacy is a survival tactic. One study estimated that at least 800 people died because they embraced a COVID falsehood — and that inquiry was conducted in the earliest months of the pandemic. About 67 percent of the unvaccinated believe at least one COVID-19 myth, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.
It’s not that accurate information isn’t available; people are rejecting reports of vaccine efficacy and safety because they distrust the news media. A third of Americans polled by Gallup said they have no trust at all in mass media; another 27 percent don’t have much at all.
Getting people to believe information presented to them depends more on trust than it does on the actual data being shared. That is, improving trust isn’t an issue of improving reporting. It’s an issue of improving relationships with one’s audience.
And that’s the real news problem right now; some celebrity anchors at cable news outlets are doing little to strengthen their relationships with their audiences and a lot to strengthen their relationships with government officials.
The most obvious example is how CNN terminated Prime Time anchor Chris Cuomo last month for his failure to disclose the entirety of his role in advising his brother, former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, on the sexual harassment accusation that unfolded in Albany, a scandal that eventually led to Andrew Cuomo’s resignation.
But there are others. Just this month, the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol revealed that another anchor on another cable news network, Laura Ingraham of Fox News’ The Ingraham Angle, texted then-White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows last January, advising Meadows how Trump should react to reports of possible armed protests at state capitols around the country. This revelation followed the story that Sean Hannity, host of the eponymous news hour at Fox News, also texted Meadows with advice last year.
And while he didn't advise a government official, CNN anchor Don Lemon revealed information not available to the public when he texted embattled Empire actor Jussie Smollett to tip him off about the Chicago Police Department’s wavering faith in his story about an assault. That’s from Smollett’s own sworn testimony.
When English philosopher Edmund Burke joked about the press being the Fourth Estate — in addition to the First, Second and Third (the clergy, nobility and commoners, respectively) — his point was that, despite their influence on each other, these “estates” — bastions of power — are supposed to be separate.
The Fourth Estate will always be an essential counterweight to government. But, since Donald Trump was elected in 2016, we’ve been so focused on stopping an executive branch from pressing the press to support an administration's agenda — either by belittling journalists or threatening to arrest them for doing their jobs — that we’ve ignored the ways that it affects and influences other Estates, and not necessarily through its reporting.
That is, we have news personalities-cum-reporters who are influencing government policy — and not telling us about it until it’s too late.
The United States has fostered an incredible closeness between the Second Estate — which in 2021 and 2022 would be political leaders — and the Fourth Estate. About a year ago, an Axios reporter had to be reassigned because she was dating one of President Biden’s press secretaries. Last year, James Bennet, the former editorial page editor of the New York Times and brother of Colorado Senator and 2020 Presidential candidate Michael Bennet, had to recuse himself publicly from the Gray Lady’s endorsement process. In 2013, the Washington Post reported at least eight marriages between Obama officials and established journalists.
To be clear, there aren’t any accusations that anyone just mentioned engaged in anything other than ethical behavior. But I, for one, don’t believe that James and Michael Bennet didn’t discuss Michael’s campaign. I don’t think the Axios reporter and her West Wing-employed boyfriend — or any journalists and their federally employed spouses, for that matter — didn’t share facts that the public will never know. Such is the nature of family and intimacy.
And as long as those conversations don’t affect the coverage of any news events, there’s nothing specifically, technically wrong with them. But that doesn’t mean that they aren’t damaging.
As these stories show, when we don’t know about these advisor roles, at least not until someone other than the journalist in question exposes them, it causes a further erosion of trust in news media.
What’s foolish about the Cuomo, Ingraham, Hannity, and Lemon improprieties is that they don't necessarily need to be the problem they’ve become. Cuomo’s show contained opinion content like 46 percent of CNN’s programming. An active debate rages on as to whether Fox News is all opinion and whether or not it can rightly even be called opinion journalism since its shows are so studded with inaccuracies and lies.
What that means is that Cuomo, Ingraham, Hannity, and Lemon are allowed to take a stand as opinion journalists; Cuomo and Lemon never really worked under a mandate of objectivity and Ingraham and Hannity likely wouldn’t honor it if they did. Indeed, a certain subjectivity — and explaining how it developed for the journalist — is part of an opinion journalist’s craft. To me, little of these consulting roles would be problematic if any of these anchors had just disclosed them and the ways they advised the people they cover.
But they didn’t. Instead, the advice they dispensed to government employees and celebrities was disclosed by a third party and news of it contributes to the public’s distrust in the media. While personal PR advisory connections between journalists and politicians haven’t been pinpointed as a source of distrust, they may have an effect. Almost two-thirds of respondents in a Pew Research poll said they attributed what they deemed unfair coverage to a political agenda on the part of the news organization. No one has rigorously examined the ways in which individual journalists can swing institutional opinion so it may be part of the reason why consumers are suspicious of news.
Cleaning up ex post facto is both a violation of journalistic ethics and ineffective. Apologies and corrections after the fact don't always improve media trust. In other credibility contests, like courtroom battles, statements against one’s interests enhance a person’s believability. But that’s not necessarily true of news; a 2015 study found that corrections don’t automatically enhance a news outlet’s credibility.
It’s a new adage for the 21st century: It’s not the consulting; it’s the cover-up. Journalists need to disclose their connections to government officials — up front — to help maintain trust in news media. Lives depend on it.

Chandra Bozelko did time in a maximum-security facility in Connecticut. While inside she became the first incarcerated person with a regular byline in a publication outside of the facility. Her “Prison Diaries" column ran in The New Haven Independent, and she later established a blog under the same name that earned several professional awards. Her columns now appear regularly in The National Memo.


Beware The Culture Warrior Posing As ‘Moderate Republican’

Virginia's new Republican governor, Glenn Youngkin, raced into office bearing two culture war baubles. One was a ban on teaching critical race theory. The other was a prohibition on mask mandates in public schools.

Each came in the form of an executive order. Neither costs anything. And both are of little consequence.

Keep reading... Show less
x
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}