Type to search

One (Restrained) Cheer for Washington

Business Congress Featured Post National News Top News Travel

One (Restrained) Cheer for Washington

Share

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

We’ve all heard the tiresome and discouraging refrain: Washington, our beautiful capital city, is broken. Dysfunctional D.C. does not work. Even with majorities in both the House and the Senate, congressional Republicans could not pass a resolution commending Mother’s Day.

But wait. We do have an actual example of the heeding of the people’s voice and the prevailing of their will in our national government. Here is the evidence: Cellphone calls will continue to be banned on airline flights. This is one small step for sanity and civility, but it deserves to be celebrated.

You don’t have to be a frequent flyer to know that American air travel has become increasingly miserable for the public. For paying passengers, there is the discomfort of ever less legroom and ever smaller seats. The luggage space shrinks, while the cost of it climbs. If farm animals were this crammed, the PETA people would be picketing. The continuing mistreatment of passengers must somewhere have been outlawed by the Geneva Conventions.

The flawed case for increasing the already high tension and stress of airline passengers — by encouraging your seatmate to invade your privacy by boasting interminably, in your ear, on his cellphone about the biggest deal east of Yorba Linda he’s just about to close or how irresistible he was to that sweet young thing from accounting last night — was that cellphone use in the air no longer poses any safety problem of interfering with pilots’ communications with ground control.

Bipartisanship, so sadly lacking from our national conversation, was temporarily revived by the possibility of cellphone calls in the air. Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee spoke for both sides of the airplane’s aisle: “Imagine 2 million passengers hurtling through space, trapped in 17-inch-wide seats, yapping their innermost thoughts. The Transportation Security Administration would have to hire three times as many air marshals to deal with the fistfights.”

My libertarian friends may argue that this cellphone ban is just one more example of the federal government’s encroaching on individual freedom and imposing a burdensome regulation on citizens and business. OK, put me down on the side of regulation, just the way I was when the feds imposed the ban on smoking on flights and when the federal government decreed that airplane wings, before attempted takeoff in subfreezing temperatures, would first be de-iced.

United Airlines — having ordered airport security guards in Chicago to forcibly remove a seated paying customer from a flight (because United had overbooked), which resulted in the passenger’s suffering a concussion, a broken nose and the loss of two teeth — inflicted a damaging body blow on the commercial air travel industry. As was noted, United put the “hospital” back into “hospitality.” One U.S. carrier that does treat its passengers with respect and professionalism and whose employees often seem even happy to see you is price-conscious Southwest Airlines. One customer went so far as to create a new slogan for Southwest in response to United’s stupidity and cruelty: “Southwest: We beat the competition. Not you.”

Admittedly, it’s only a small victory in a big struggle. But the feds’ decision to continue the ban on cellphone calls in flight is a win for common sense, civility and American peace of mind.

To find out more about Mark Shields and read his past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.

 

Tags:

5 Comments

  1. Aaron_of_Portsmouth April 15, 2017

    Despite many efforts to be more considerate and mindful of other people, many of us still feel it is a God-given right to do as one please, whenever, and to hell with the inconvenience it may cause to others.
    The example of air travel discomforts just to make profits is another example of the sense on unbridled freedom to do whatever we want. After all, imposing rules(regulations) on what is acceptable would be “politically correct”, and which would have cast Jesus Christ Himself as a socialist politically correct vicegerent on earth on behalf of Him who sent Jesus to humanity. The gall of God or Jesus to impose on us certain norms regarding behavior and consideration of others!! And what temerity God has to admonish us to be concerned for the well-being of others—what sort of fascist/communist rubbish is that??

    “The All-Knowing Physician hath His finger on the pulse of mankind. He perceiveth the disease, and prescribeth, in His unerring wisdom, the remedy. Every age hath its own problem, and every soul its particular aspiration. The remedy the world needeth in its present-day afflictions can never be the same as that which a subsequent age may require. Be anxiously concerned with the needs of the age ye live in, and center your deliberations on its exigencies and requirements.”

    Reply
  2. bojimbo26 April 16, 2017

    Another article saying the plane was overbooked .
    IT WAS NOT .
    It was a full flight but 4 United employees wanted to get on . Volunteers were asked to deplane but when there were no takers , the computer spewed out 4 passengers names .
    When Dr Dao refused to get off , he was manhandled off the flight .
    He is now suing United Airlines .

    Reply
  3. FireBaron April 16, 2017

    For once Congress actually listened to the Airline Pilots Association!
    Did they listen to them complain about overbooking? Nope.
    Did they listen to them complain about additional seats requiring additional fuel to carry the greater loads? Nope.
    Did they listen to them complain about improper training of Air Traffic Controllers? Not a chance in Hell.
    But, as most members of Congress have to fly on public carriers, they asked, “Do you really want to listen to someone gripe about you on the phone while flying from DC to San Diego?” Well, that got their attention big time.

    Reply
    1. Lindackain April 16, 2017

      Managing director of Google!, is explaining to users to start off “Work at home” method, that People have been doing for about one year now. These days alone, I generated close to $36,000 until now with no more than my home computer as well as some spare time, despite that i have a fulltime 9 to 5 job. Even everyone not used to this, can make $89/per h easily and the earnings can go even higher over time… This is how i started
      !wr350c:
      ➽➽
      ➽➽➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialCashJobs350OfficeReal/GetPaid$97/Hour ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫:::!wr350u:……

  4. Myra Ellis April 16, 2017

    @bojimbo26:disqus
    If you are curious about gaining $100 every single day… view this>>> http://aww.su/eds4U

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.