The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from


Guards at an Environmental Protection Agency summit roughed up reporters attempting to cover the agency’s latest scandal and physically removed them from the room.

The summit covered newly revealed details about high levels of toxic chemicals in the U.S. water supply. This was just the latest black eye for the agency, as reports indicate the EPA and the White House tried to suppress the study.

Apparently, the cavalcade of scandals at the agency under administrator Scott Pruitt led top officials to think covering up this horrific report was better than trying to do something to solve the problem.

And the cover-up continued at the summit, as the EPA tried to bar reporters from the Associated Press, CNN, and E&E News from attending.

Jahan Wilcox, an EPA spokesperson, told reporters there was no space for them at the event. But other reports indicate there were many empty chairs at the venue.

At a security checkpoint, an AP reporter tried to speak to a public affairs representative. AP reportsthat “security guards grabbed the reporter by the shoulders and shoved her forcibly out of the EPA building.”

AP executive editor Sally Buzbee said in a statement that it’s “particularly distressing that any journalists trying to cover an event in the public interest would be forcibly removed.”

And CNN said the EPA “selectively excluded CNN and other media outlets.” The network added, “We understand the importance of an open and free press and we hope the EPA does, too.”

After a public outcry from reporters about the agency’s tactics, it announced that journalists could cover the second half of the summit.

Suddenly, they had room to accommodate them that they didn’t have before.

The Trump administration tried to hide the details of an important public health issue so that the scandal-plagued EPA could save face this time around. Then they lied again to attempt to keep reporters from getting to the truth.

But all that did was somehow manage to make the disaster that is Trump’s EPA look even worse.


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Sen. Bernie Sanders, left, and President Joe Biden during 2020 presidential debate

I look at September 2019 as a month where I missed something. We began with a trip to New York to do Seth Meyers’s and Dr. Oz’s shows. Why would we go on The Dr. Oz Show? For the same reason we had gone on Joe Rogan’s podcast in August: We could reach a vast audience that wasn’t paying attention to the standard political media. On Dr. Oz, Bernie could talk about Medicare for All and his own physical fitness. While at the time we believed Bernie was uncommonly healthy for his age, he was still 78. Questions would be raised related to his age, and we needed to begin building up the case that he was completely healthy and fit. It turned out to be a spectacular interview, ending with the two of them playing basketball on a makeshift court in the studio. Bernie appeared to be on top of the world.

Yet in retrospect, I should have seen Bernie growing more fatigued. After New York, with the school year starting, we did a series of rallies at colleges and universities in Iowa; this was the kickoff of our campus organizing program in the state. We would then fly to Colorado for a large rally in Denver before heading to Boulder to prep for the third debate, to take place in Houston on September 12. In Iowa, Bernie’s voice was a little hoarse. After the rally in Denver, he had completely blown it out. He sounded terrible.

Keep reading... Show less

Rep. James Clyburn

When I interviewed House Majority Whip James Clyburn in 2014 about his memoir Blessed Experiences: Genuinely Southern, Proudly Black, the South Carolina Democrat was confident in America’s ability to find its way, no matter how extreme the political swings might appear at any given time.

“The country from its inception is like the pendulum on a clock,” the congressman told me. “It goes back and forward. It tops out to the right and starts back to the left — it tops out to the left and starts back to the right.” And remember, he said, it “spends twice as much time in the center.”

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}