The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}


Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) insisted Wednesday morning that Trump’s efforts to obstruct justice in the Mueller investigation was really Trump “pursuing justice.”

During his time questioning special counsel Robert Mueller at a hearing before the Judiciary Committee, Gohmert unleashed a screed defending Trump’s obstructive acts by claiming Trump was entitled to obstruct justice because Trump was unhappy about Mueller’s investigation.

Gohmert claims that Trump saw “the big Justice Department with people that hate” him, and since Trump knew he was innocent, his attempts to derail the Mueller investigation “is not obstructing justice. He is pursuing justice.”

Red-faced, Gohmert then jabbed his finger in the direction of Mueller and declared the special counsel was the one who “perpetuated injustice” by doing his job.

Gohmert is defending Trump’s criminal conduct with the same excuse Attorney General William Barr and other Republicans have used. In April, Barr excused Trump’s actions because Trump was “frustrated and angered” over Mueller’s investigation and the media attention it received.

However, hundreds of federal prosecutors disagree with the notion that being grumpy is a valid legal argument for obstructing justice. Hundreds of former federal prosecutors signed a letter declaring Trump should face multiple felony charges.

Three former federal prosecutors who worked for Republican presidents made a video outlining Trump’s criminal actions. “As a former prosecutor, I did not think it was even a close prosecutorial call as to whether the president obstructed justice,” Jeffery Harris, Reagan’s deputy associate attorney general said.

Rather than ask Mueller about the contents of the report, Gohmert used his time to defend Trump’s documented attempts to derail an investigation as somehow “pursuing justice.”

Published with permission of The American Independent.


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Judge Alexis G. Krot

Judge Alexis G. Krot shouted at Burhan Chowdhury, a 72 year old cancer patient whom local police cited for not maintaining his yard. “If I could give you jail time on this I would,” the Michigan jurist warned Chowdhury.

A cancer diagnosis doesn’t buy much more leniency in other courtrooms. In 2020, a judge in Pennsylvania sentenced Ashley Menser, a 36 year old in need of a hysterectomy for ovarian and cervical cancer, to a 10 month term.

Keep reading... Show less

Donald Trump, left, and Joe Biden

Photo by Andrea Widburg

America's political media — and especially our "punditocracy" — suffer from myriad defects. They love simple answers and often seem hostile to complexity. They tend to obsess slavishly over the latest polling data. And they suffer from a chronic amnesia that erases not only historical context but even very recent events from their narrow minds.

Marking the end of President Joe Biden's first year in office, the media consensus followed a predictable and familiar framing. After 12 months, with the coronavirus pandemic continuing, his legislative agenda incomplete and his approval ratings in steep decline, Biden was all but declared a failure — with no clear way forward.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}