fbpx ');*/ /*jQuery("#postgridID").addClass("second"); jQuery("#content-wrapper #page-wrapper .tt-content .vc_row .tt-slider-content #postgridID").before(''); */ });

Type to search

How Republicans Lobbied To Limit Voting Hours In North Carolina

Campaign 2016 Elections National News Politics Reuters Top News US

How Republicans Lobbied To Limit Voting Hours In North Carolina

Republicans attempted to limit voting in North Carolina

By Julia Harte

ASHEBORO, N.C. (Reuters) – When Bill McAnulty, an elections board chairman in a mostly white North Carolina county, agreed in July to open a Sunday voting site where black church members could cast ballots after services, the reaction was swift: he was labeled a traitor by his fellow Republicans.

“I became a villain, quite frankly,” recalled McAnulty at a state board of elections meeting in September that had been called to resolve disputes over early voting plans. “I got accused of being a traitor and everything else by the Republican Party,” McAnulty said.

Following the blowback from Republicans, McAnulty later withdrew his support for the Sunday site.

In an interview with Reuters, he said he ultimately ruled against opening the Sunday voting site in Randolph County because he had “made a mistake in reading the wishes of the voters.” He declined to discuss the episode further.

This year’s highly charged presidential contest between Democrat Hillary Clinton and Republican Donald Trump has stoked accusations by both parties of political meddling in the scheduling of early voting hours in North Carolina, a coveted battleground state with a history of tight elections.

In emails, state and county Republican officials lobbied members of at least 17 county election boards to keep early-voting sites open for shorter hours on weekends and in evenings – times that usually see disproportionately high turnout by Democratic voters. Reuters obtained the emails through a public records request.

The officials also urged county election boards to open fewer sites for residents to cast ballots during early voting that began on Oct. 20 and ends on Saturday.

Civil rights advocates and Democrats launched their own campaigns for expanded early voting hours.

The tug-of-war yielded mixed results.

The state did ultimately add nearly 5,900 more hours and 78 more sites to vote early than in 2012. But several counties opened only one polling site during the first week of early voting, slightly denting turnout across the state. Voter turnout dropped by 20 percent in the counties that had multiple polling sites during the first week of early voting in 2012 but just one site during the first week in 2016.

“We currently have more early voting locations and hours open than ever were open under Democrat control,” said North Carolina Republican Party executive director Dallas Woodhouse, denying his party was trying to suppress the Democratic vote.

President Barack Obama praised the expanded early voting opportunities during an election stop in North Carolina on Wednesday.

“Those who wanted to suppress the vote, they’re going to fail,” he said at University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill in Raleigh. “Right now, there are more one-stop early vote sites in North Carolina than ever before.”

Counties that Obama, a Democrat, won in 2012 increased their Sunday hours this year by 16 percent, while counties that voted for his Republican rival, Mitt Romney, decreased them by nearly a quarter, the records show.

State Republican officials say keeping polls open during evenings and weekends, or “off-hour” times, drains county resources.


In two emails, on Aug. 11 and Aug. 14, Woodhouse urged Republicans serving on county election boards to follow the “party line” on curtailing the early voting period.

“Many of our folks are angry and opposed to Sunday voting,” he wrote. “Six days of voting in one week is enough. Period.” Keeping polling sites open for the full 17-day early voting period “may be wasteful and unnecessary,” he added.

Woodhouse’s emails were subsequently published by local media, but he was not alone in lobbying to limit voting hours, the Reuters review of public records shows. The review counted similar emails from at least four other Republican Party officials to election boards, each of which is composed of two Republicans and one Democrat.

The same day that Woodhouse sent his Aug. 11 email, Elaine Hewitt, a member of the Rowan County Republican Executive Committee, sent the county elections board two proposed schedules for early voting, both of which included just one site for the first four days and no sites on Sundays.

“With all of the opportunities to vote by mail, early in person Monday – Saturday, and on Election Day, there is no justification for requiring election workers to work on Sundays,” she wrote.

Garry Terry, the chairman of the Republican Party for North Carolina’s First Congressional District, sent an email on Aug. 13 to elections board members in his region, reminding them to act “in the best interest of the Republican Party” by opposing Sunday voting and restricting early voting to one location.

Hewitt and Terry did not respond to requests for comment. Woodhouse defended the actions of the Republican officials, telling Reuters that Republican opposition to Sunday voting was not discriminatory but was rather based on the belief that people should not be required to work on Sundays.

The Sunday polling site that McAnulty first supported and then opposed would have been located at the Randolph County Board of Elections office and would have cost around $1,000 to operate, according to the office director.

“If it’s not wasteful and it allows more people to vote… the board has historically been for that,” Margaret Megerian, the Democratic member of board, told Reuters.


In contrast with the Republicans’ email campaign, the Democratic push to expand early voting hours has largely taken shape in public forums.

In Democratic-leaning Guilford County, the state’s third largest, a county board of elections meeting on Aug. 8 attracted about 75 people after word spread that the board was planning to halve the number of early voting sites, from 24 in 2012.

The Rev. Nelson Johnson said in an interview that the proposal by the board’s Republican chairwoman would “prevent voting especially by people who can’t easily take time off” and said it “absolutely” had a racial intent. Johnson, who is African American, leads a community center in Greensboro, North Carolina.

Board Chairwoman Kathryn Lindley told Reuters she believed “a lesser number of sites would cause less confusion about which places were going to be open,” and that it was “ludicrous” to think her suggested plan had been discriminatory.

The board ultimately agreed to 25 early voting sites and one day of Sunday voting before the November election. Johnson said the decision was “a significant triumph.” Lindley said Johnson’s group had no influence on the final outcome.

Guilford’s plan also included one restriction that particularly angered Democrats. In the first week of early voting in 2012, residents could vote at 16 sites. This year, that has been reduced to one.

Mary Cranford, 52, a registered Republican, was fourth in line on the first day of early voting in Guilford. She was able to vote but said she was upset that only one site was open for the first week. She said she voted for Clinton this year.

“I can’t believe what’s been done to keep some people from voting in this state,” she said.

Just 7,916 people voted in the first week of early voting in Guilford this year, compared to 60,732 in 2012, according to state elections board records.

The general counsel for Clinton’s campaign and other plaintiffs filed a court motion on Oct. 1 demanding Guilford and four other North Carolina counties expand their early voting opportunities. The court denied it, saying that changing the early voting plans “would create logistical difficulties.”

(Reporting by Julia Harte, additional reporting by Andy Sullivan, editing by Jason Szep and Ross Colvin)

IMAGE: North Carolina campaign buttons sit on a table before the start of a rally with Republican U.S. presidential nominee Donald Trump in Fletcher, North Carolina, U.S. October 21, 2016. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst – RTX2PW7X



  1. dpaano November 3, 2016

    Apparently, some of these states with “republican” boards don’t realize that there are TWO different parties and no ONE party has the right to disenfranchise the other party from voting! If they are that afraid that their candidate won’t win that they have to curtail voting polls and times, then maybe they need to choose a better candidate!!!

    1. Jon November 3, 2016

      Republicans are also worried about losing their senate seat in NC. They will suppress the vote in any way they believe possible. They don’t want everyone to vote. Smaller turnouts tend to favor Republicans.

      1. teresa.belk.92 November 3, 2016

        After being fired from my previous job 6 months ago, i’ve had luck to find this fantastic website that was a life saver for me… Offering very well paid online jobs from home. Last payment after working for them for three months was $13000… Awesome thing about is that only requirement for this job is basic typing skills and connection to the internet… http://korta.nu/MDe

      2. dpaano November 4, 2016

        But, it just doesn’t seem logical to me….don’t they realize that their efforts to stop people from voting will only hurt their cause and not help it. Most people, if they think they’re being held back from doing their duty of voting, will do all they can to get to the polls to vote. I know that I would fight anyone that would try to intimidate me from voting! I just hope that others will do the same if faced with this problem.

        1. Jon November 4, 2016

          Disenfranchised voters in NC did file a petition in state court asking the court to order that they be re-instated on the voting rolls. The state court denied the petition and it has been filed in federal court. The last thing I knew, the federal judge had harshly criticized the scheme but had not yet ruled.
          I heard about a new voter suppression effort Republicans are trying in several states. They are contacting registered Democrats urging them to vote online or use their cell phones to vote. With an exception for our military personnel stationed overseas, neither one of these methods is legal in any state. Very clever devious Republicans.

  2. Jmz Nesky November 4, 2016

    It’s unanimous, the now corrupt republican party needs to be phased out in favor of legitimate third parties.. They’re attempt to monopolize the election procedure has disqualified them from being a contender for any election. The democratic party should follow suit if they too start playing dirty tricks with our electoral system. We need honesty in our public officials, we are sick and tired of the “win by any means” manipulators. Sign the petition if one comes your way.. Do not continue to allow corruption in our electoral procedures. We want to know a candidates abilities, experience.. successes and failures that are on record not a rivals dirty laundry as told by their contender because we can determine those things ourselves. We are belly full of the lesser evil. Take money out of our voting decisions. Stop regulating our voting freedom. We can demand these things because we are the voters, not the candidates, their party NOR the media or the press.

    1. dpaano November 4, 2016

      I agree…..apparently, these idiots don’t read the Constitution. The government is owned by the people of the United States, NOT by just two parties. We are the ones that have the say on voting…..not so-called Boards! We need to make our voices heard after this election and let our government and our senators know that we are not happy with the way this election was run, especially with voting rights!

    2. Anna Maria Yoakum November 5, 2016

      Hear ! Hear ! I think most of our glorious nation feels the same way. If there is but one positive thing that came from this election season, it is that the corruption of the RepubliCON party is finally being exposed. Though many have suspected it, I doubt that any of us realized exactly how deep and extensive this corruption went, even infesting agencies such as the FBI.

      1. Jmz Nesky November 5, 2016

        Well if we didn’t then it was blatantly realized in 2008 when the party refused to respect our new president and systematically used the nation as their own bargaining table which they abused and defiled for almost eight years, now their hooks are ready to do the very same thing to HRC in order to see that another Democrat doesn’t fulfill their promises to the people. They are a bunch of angry vindictive hoodlums hiding behind religion and their definition of the word ‘patriotism’.

  3. jacqueline.lusk November 4, 2016

    After getting fired from my previous job six months ago, I was lucky to come across this great website that was a life-saver for me… They provide internet jobs for which people can freelance online from their home. Last check after working with them for 3 months was 13000 dollars… Great thing about is that only thing needed is basic typing skills and access to internet… http://korta.nu/MDe


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.