The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Published with permission from Media Matters for America.

NY Times: “Roger Ailes’ Tenure As The Head Of Fox News Appears To Be Over.” The New York Timesreported on July 19 that Fox News Chairman and CEO Roger Ailes is in the “advanced stages of discussions that would lead to his departure as chairman” of Fox, citing one of Alies’ lawyers:

Roger Ailes’s tenure as the head of Fox News appears to be over.

Mr. Ailes and 21st Century Fox, Fox News’s parent company, are in the advanced stages of discussions that would lead to his departure as chairman, Susan Estrich, one of Mr. Ailes’s lawyers, said in an interview on Tuesday.

The development follows a sexual harassment suit filed on July 6 against Mr. Ailes by a former anchor, Gretchen Carlson. The suit prompted 21st Century Fox to conduct an internal review and it set off an intense round of speculation in the news media and the television industry about Mr. Ailes’s future at Fox News. [The New York Times7/19/16]

CNN: “It’s Official: Trump Is Republican Nominee.” Also on July 19, reported that Trump “is the 2016 GOP presidential nominee,” having received “the 1,237 delegates he needed to clinch the nomination.” From the July 19 article:

Donald Trump, the billionaire businessman whose outsider campaign has both galvanized millions of voters and divided the Republican Party, is the 2016 GOP presidential nominee.


His son Donald Trump, Jr., cast the votes for the New York delegation that put the billionaire businessman over the top of the 1,237 delegates he needed to clinch the nomination, as any talk of disruptive protest votes or walkouts dissipated. [, 7/19/16]

Media Figures Point To Timing Of Events To Note How Fox Led To The Rise Of Trump

NY Times’ Nicholas Kristof: Ailes’ “Fox Created Space That Trump Filled.” New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof wrote that Trump’s and Ailes’ “trajectories are deeply interwoven” and that “Trump is the Republican nominee perhaps in part because Fox News and other prominent right-wing commentators weakened the control of Republican Party bosses.” Kristof added, “Fox created space that Trump filled.” From the July 19 column:

Donald Trump is rising, and Roger Ailes is tumbling — and their trajectories are deeply interwoven.

Ailes’s tenure as head of Fox News appears to be ending, just as the Republican Party he shaped is meeting here in Cleveland for its convention. And it’s a tribute to Ailes’s vision that today’s G.O.P. has been galvanized, prodded and molded by Fox News.

Indeed, Trump is the Republican nominee perhaps in part because Fox News and other prominent right-wing commentators weakened the control of Republican Party bosses. Fox News certainly didn’t create Trump, and he had many disputes with it and especially with Megyn Kelly, but Fox created space that Trump filled. I disagree profoundly with much of Fox News’ reporting, but it’s impossible to deny its importance as a social and political force in America. [The New York Times7/19/16]

NY Times’ Ross Douthat: Ailes’ Fox “Embodied The Tensions That Trump Has Exploited” And “Prepare[d] The Way” For Trump. New York Times columnist Ross Douthat, pointing out the “irony” of “Ailes’s Fox News career apparently ending” as “Trump accepts the Republican nomination,” wrote that “Ailes helped build and define a long era in conservative politics” and that his network “embodied the tensions that Trump has exploited.” Douthat added that Fox “did clearly resemble, and prepare the way for, the authoritarian and very New York populism of Donald Trump.” From the July 20 blog post:

In a political year already rich in coincidence, irony and end-of-an-era intimations, having Roger Ailes’s Fox News career apparently ending amid sexual harassment allegations just as Donald Trump accepts the Republican nomination seems almost too much — as though the muse of history has given up on plausibility and is playing everything for shock value.

No less than the late Antonin Scalia and the now-defunct Bush dynasty, Ailes helped build and define a long era in conservative politics. But more than other conservative institutions, his wildly successful network — which came relatively late to the conservative scene, well after the Reagan’s presidency — also embodied the tensions that Trump has exploited in putting that era to the torch.


And then there is the Fox of Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity and their various epigones (plus the flaring comet that was Glenn Beck). Its animating spirit is an aggrieved, “who’s looking out for me?” resentment mixed (in Hannity’s case, especially) with hackish partisanship. And its stars trafficked in a kind of white identity politics long before Trump’s ascent.

A marriage of conservatism and populism is hardly unique to Fox, of course. It’s been part of the right’s DNA since William F. Buckley brought conservative thought down into the grubby world of Republican politics.

But Ailes and his stars gave the populist side of the marriage a distinctive and very New York sort of form — pugilistic and patriotic, more secular than religious and more authoritarian than libertarian. And they exported that package, with its leggy blondes and outer-borough tough guys, to conservative viewers all over the country. Fox’s populist style didn’t look that much like the populism of the Goldwaterites or the religious right. But it did clearly resemble, and prepare the way for, the authoritarian and very New York populism of Donald Trump. [The New York Times7/20/16]

Financial Times’ Edward Luce: “It Is Hard To Imagine [Trump’s] Message Having Taken Root Without Mr Ailes’ Groundwork.” Financial Times columnist Edward Luce noted, “On the same day Donald Trump secured the Republican nomination,” Ailes “was being ushered out of his role” at Fox and wrote that “it is hard to imagine [Trump’s] message having taken root without Mr Ailes’ groundwork” as the “wizard behind the curtain to more than two generations of Republican presidential candidates, conservative pundits and intellectuals.” From the July 20 column:

God seems to be toying with American conservatives. On the same day Donald Trump secured the Republican nomination, Roger Ailes, legendary creator of Fox News, was being ushered out of his role.

Mr Trump’s rise may have taken the world by surprise but it is hard to imagine his message having taken root without Mr Ailes’ groundwork.

Felled by sexual harassment allegations from a former Fox anchor, the news channel’s departing creator is no household name. Yet Mr Ailes has played wizard behind the curtain to more than two generations of Republican presidential candidates, conservative pundits and intellectuals. He is the creator and destroyer of ambitions — the Shiva of US conservatism. Without Mr Ailes, Rupert Murdoch would have been a far less potent figure on the US scene. [Financial Times7/20/16]

Reason’s Matt Welch: Fox’s “Pocket-Lining Populism” “Built Up Political Expectations That Couldn’t Possibly Be Met, Helping To Create Trump’s Opening.” Reason editor Matt Welch wrote that Ailes reportedly leaving Fox and Trump securing the nomination were two “cataclysmic piece[s] of political news on the right” and explained that Ailes had recognized “that a clever broadcaster could leverage … frustration and build uncommon loyalty through a mix of gleeful populism, rhetorical pugilism, and a leg-chair or three,” which ultimately helped “to create Trump’s opening.” From the July 18 blog post:

And yet we were not talking Donald Trump’s final, decisive rout of his internal opposition. We were talking about today’s other cataclysmic piece of political news on the right: Gabriel Sherman’s report in New York magazine that the Murdoch family has decided to part ways with Fox News titan Roger Ailes in the wake of former anchor Gretchen Carlson’s sexual harassment lawsuit. Sherman has an axe to grind against Fox and Ailes, but his sourcing is usually pretty good. (In a reaction statement to Politico, 21st Century Fox said “This matter is not yet resolved and the review is not concluded.”)

Sometimes the symbolism is too obvious to ignore. Less than 12 months after Donald Trump made the daring, calculated decision to run a campaign not just against the media and the conservative establishment, but against the single most influential and profitable brand in conservative media, both of his main targets suffered life-changing defeats on the first day of the Republican National Convention. Conservatism as we have known it these past 20-plus years will never be the same.


Ailes recognized decades before Trump did that traditional media outlets in print and broadcast condescended to, sneered at, and certainly did not intrinsically understand huge swaths of the country, and that a clever broadcaster could leverage the resulting frustration and build uncommon loyalty through a mix of gleeful populism, rhetorical pugilism, and a leg-chair or three. His approach was both shrewd and instinctual, and it changed the face not just of media but of politics.


The “Entertainment Wing” of the GOP became increasingly indistinguishable from the party’s talent base (indeed, personnel continue to wash back and forth from Capitol Hill to the Avenue of Americas).

But all that pocket-lining populism over time has built up political expectations that couldn’t possibly be met, helping to create Trump’s opening as well as some internal divisions and on-air spats over at Fox. It’s no accident that Trump is reportedly thinking about launching a TV network should the whole politics thing fall short. [Reason6/18/16]


Photo: Flickr user DonkeyHotey


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

  • 1.Why did Trump choose to hide certain specific files and not others at Mar-a-Lago? What were the criteria that Trump used to keep some files concealed and not others? Who selected those files? Did Trump consult or direct anyone in his selection of secret files? Trump was notorious for being too impatient to read his briefing papers, even after they had been drastically shortened and simplified. Is there the slightest evidence that he spirited these papers away so that he could consult or study them? Who besides Trump knew of the presence of the files he had concealed at Mar-a-Lago?
  • 2. Mar-a-Lago has an infamous reputation for being open to penetration even by foreign spies. In 2019, the FBI arrested a Chinese woman who had entered the property with electronic devices. She was convicted of trespassing, lying to the Secret Service, and sentenced and served eight-months in a federal prison, before being deported to China. Have other individuals with possible links to foreign intelligence operations been present at Mar-a-Lago?
  • 3. Did members of Trump's Secret Service detail have knowledge of his secret storage of the files at Mar-a-Lago? What was the relationship of the Secret Service detail to the FBI? Did the Secret Service, or any agent, disclose information about the files to the FBI?
  • 4. Trump's designated representatives to the National Archives are Kash Patel and John Solomon, co-conspirators in the investigations into Russian interference in the presidential election of 2016, the Ukraine missiles-for-political dirt scandal that led to the first impeachment in 2019, and the coup of 2020. Neither has any professional background in handling archival materials. Patel, a die-hard Trump loyalist whose last job in the administration was as chief of staff to the Acting Secretary of Defense, was supposedly involved in Trump’s “declassification” of some files. Patel has stated, “Trump declassified whole sets of materials in anticipation of leaving government that he thought the American public should have the right to read themselves."
  • The White House counsel failed to generate the paperwork to change the classification markings, but that doesn’t mean the information wasn’t declassified.” If Pat Cipollone, the White House legal counsel, did not “generate the paperwork,” was he or anyone on his staff aware at all of the declassifications? The White House Staff Secretary Derek Lyons resigned his post in December 2020. Did his successor, who held the position for a month, while Trump was consumed with plotting his coup, ever review the material found in Trump’s concealed files for declassification? Or did Patel review the material? Can Patel name any individual who properly reviewed the supposed declassification?
  • 5. Why did Trump keep his pardon of Roger Stone among his secret files? Was it somehow to maintain leverage over Stone? What would that leverage be? Would it involve Stone's role as a conduit with the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers during the coup? Or is there another pardon in Trump’s files for Stone, a secret pardon for his activities in the January 6th insurrection? Because of the sweeping nature of the pardon clause, pardons can remain undisclosed (until needed). Pardons are self-executing, require no justification and are not subject to court review beyond the fact of their timely execution. In other words, a court may verify the pardon was valid in time but has no power to review appropriateness. A pardon could even be oral but would need to be verifiable by a witness. Do the files contain secret pardons for Trump himself, members of his family, members of the Congress, and other co-conspirators?
  • 6.Was the FBI warrant obtained to block the imminent circulation or sale of information in the files to foreign powers? Does the affidavit of the informant at Mar-a-Lago, which has not been released, provide information about Trump’s monetization that required urgency in executing the warrant? Did Trump monetize information in any of the files? How? With whom? Any foreign power or entity? Was the Saudi payment from its sovereign wealth fund for the LIV Golf Tournament at Trump’s Bedminster Golf Club for a service that Trump rendered, an exchange of anything of value or information that was in the files? If it involved information in the files was it about nuclear programs? Was it about the nuclear program of Israel? How much exactly was the Saudi payment for the golf tournament? The Saudi sovereign wealth fund gave Jared Kushner and former Trump Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin $2 billion for their startup hedge fund, Affinity Partners. Do the Saudis regard that investment as partial payment for Trump’s transfer of nuclear information? Were Kushner or Mnuchin aware of the secret files at Mar-a-Lago?
  • 7.Did Trump destroy any of the files? If so, when? Did those files contain incriminating information? Did he destroy any files after he received the June subpoena?
  • 8.Were any of the secrets of our allies compromised? Has the U.S. government provided an inventory of breaches or potential breaches to our allies?
  • 9.Does the resort maintain a copying machine near the classified documents that Trump hid? Were any of the documents copied or scanned? Are Trump’s documents at Mar-a-Lago originals or copies? Were any copies shown or given to anyone?
  • 10.Trump’s lawyer Christina Bobb has revealed that a video surveillance system covers the places where Trump hid the files at Mar-a-Lago, and that the system is connected to a system at his other residences at the Bedminster Golf Club in New Jersey and Trump Tower in New York City. According to Bobb, Trump and members of his family observed the FBI search and seizure of his files at Mar-a-Lago, “actually able to see the whole thing” through their surveillance system. Who has that surveillance system recorded entering the rooms where the files were kept?

Kevin Bacon, right, in "The Following"

The aftermath of the August 8, 2022 search of the Mar-a-Lago club, former President Donald Trump’s Florida home, isn’t the first showdown between the FBI and a cult leader.

The Following, a 2013 Fox Pictures series, played out in similar fashion. Three seasons was enough for the producers and it’s been nine years since our introduction to Joe Carroll, English professor-novelist-serial killer, so there’s a spoiler risk -- but not enough to prevent the comparison.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}