The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Mitt Romney’s math still doesn’t add up.

The Republican nominee for president’s proposed new tax breaks would cost $294 billion in their first year, according to a new study by Citizens For Tax Justice. The deductions he’s proposed would only pay for 36 percent of that increase.

Romney has only been clear about which taxes he wants to cut. They include extending the Bush tax breaks for all incomes, eliminating the Estate Tax, repealing the Alternate Minimum Tax and eliminating all taxes on investment income on people earning less than $200,000 a year. In addition he would cut federal taxes on everyone who pays them by 20 percent.

Romney has said “Of course!” the numbers add up, but has refused to name the deductions he would eliminate to make the tax cuts revenue-neutral as he’s promised. In the second debate he suggested that he would set a deduction cap at a fixed number such as $25,000. That would pay for less than half of his cuts. And result in new tax breaks for many rich Americans.

“Eighty-eight percent of the richest one percent would still see a net tax cut and only 10 percent would see a net tax increase from Romney’s new tax proposals,” according to Citizens For Tax Justice.

Romney has promised that he would not cut the share of taxes paid by the rich, but if he’s cutting taxes across the board, the rich will pay a lower amount of taxes.

To pay for these cuts he would either explode the deficit or increase taxes on the middle class up to $4,000 a year.

You can read a PDF of the study here.

Photo credit: AP Photo/David Goldman

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Mark Levin

Politico reported Friday that John Eastman, the disgraced ex-law professor who formulated many of former President Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results, was also apparently in communication with Fox News host Mark Levin. The story gets even more interesting from there, revealing the shell game that right-wing media personalities engage in while doubling as political operatives.

A legal filing by Eastman’s attorneys reveals that, among the messages Eastman is still attempting to conceal from the House January 6 committee are 12 pieces of correspondence with an individual matching Levin’s description as “a radio talk show host, is also an attorney, former long-time President (and current board chairman) of a public interest law firm, and also a former fellow at The Claremont Institute.” Other details, including a sloppy attempt to redact an email address, also connect to Levin, who did not respond to Politico’s requests for comment.

Keep reading... Show less

Sen. Wendy Rogers

Youtube Screenshot

There have been powerful indicators of the full-bore radicalization of the Republican Party in the past year: the 100-plus extremist candidates it fielded this year, the apparent takeover of the party apparatus in Oregon, the appearance of Republican officials at white nationalist gatherings. All of those are mostly rough gauges or anecdotal evidence, however; it’s been difficult to get a clear picture of just how deeply the extremism has penetrated the party.

Using social media as a kind of proxy for their real-world outreach—a reasonable approach, since there are few politicians now who don’t use social media—the Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights decided to get a clearer picture of the reach of extremist influences in official halls of power by examining how many elected officials participate in extremist Facebook groups. What it found was deeply troubling: 875 legislators in all 50 states, constituting nearly 22% of all elected GOP lawmakers, identified as participating members of extremist Facebook groups.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}