The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Senator Jim Inhofe (R-OK), who recently underwent an emergency quadruple bypass, claimed on Sunday that the Affordable Care Act — which he described as “socialized medicine like Obama is trying to impose upon America” — could have killed him.

“A person can find out, here in the U.S., that he has this emergency situation where he has got to have immediate heart surgery. And if you are in a country other than the U.S., a lot of them, you can’t get it done,” Inhofe told radio host Aaron Klein. “In my case, with my age, that would have been about a six-month wait. Because I hadn’t had a heart attack.”

“And so the message there is, you know I say this to all of your American listeners, let’s hold on to what we’ve got here,” he added. “You are talking to someone right now who probably wouldn’t be here if we had socialized medicine in America.”

Inhofe’s claim that Obamacare could have served as his own personal death panel is startling — and literally 100 percent wrong. First, the Affordable Care Act, which relies on competition between private insurers, is not an example of socialized medicine. Second, the Affordable Care Act explicitly prohibits the type of health care rationing that Inhofe fears. Third, government-run health care would not mean that the elderly must wait six months for emergency heart surgery (as anyone on Medicare could tell him). And finally, Inhofe’s assertion seems to overlook the fact that Obamacare is already the law of the land — if it could have killed him, it would have.

Perhaps it isn’t surprising that Inhofe — who will never be confused for a policy wonk — seems to completely misunderstand the law. After all, back in 2009 he proudly acknowledged that he had no intention of reading the Affordable Care Act before voting against it.

Photo: Gage Skidmore via Flickr


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Dr. Mehmet Oz and Sean Hannity

Youtube Screenshot

Fox News prime-time host Sean Hannity is priming his audience to see election fraud in any defeat for Dr. Mehmet Oz, his favored candidate who currently leads the GOP primary for U.S. Senate in Pennsylvania with two percent of votes outstanding. If the fast-closing hedge funder Dave McCormick takes the lead and the Oz camp claims the election has been stolen, it could set up a potentially explosive proxy war with Hannity’s colleague Laura Ingraham, whose Fox program favors McCormick and has suggested he is likely to prevail when all the votes are counted.

The GOP primary was a chaotic slugfest that split Fox’s slate of pro-GOP hosts in an unusually public way. Hannity was Oz’s most prominent supporter, reportedly securing the support of former President Donald Trump and using his program to endorse the TV personality, give him a regular platform, and target the challenge from right-wing commentator and Fox & Friends regular Kathy Barnette. Ingraham, meanwhile, used her Fox program (which airs in the hour following Hannity’s) to promote McCormick, criticize Oz, and defend Barnette.

Keep reading... Show less
Youtube Screenshot

Overturning Roe v. Wade is very unpopular, yet another poll confirms. Nearly two out of three people, or 64 percent, told the NPR/PBS Newshour/Marist poll that Roe should not be overturned, including 62 percent of independents. The poll also includes some good news for Democrats.

According to the poll, the prospect of the Supreme Court striking down Roe in the most extreme way is motivating Democratic voters more than Republicans: Sixty-six percent of Democrats say it makes them more likely to vote in November compared with 40 percent of Republicans. That echoes a recent NBC poll finding a larger rise in enthusiasm about voting among Democrats than Republicans.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}