Tag: cars
U.S. News Announces the 2016 Best Cars for the Money

U.S. News Announces the 2016 Best Cars for the Money

Photo: Automobile traffic backs-up as it travels north from San Diego to Los Angeles along Interstate Highway 5 in California December 10, 2013. REUTERS/Mike Blake

Farewell, My Unlovely

Farewell, My Unlovely

I have owned, back in my earlier life, seven Volkswagens, six of them Bugs. They promised traction, because the engine was in the rear. Through Vermont winters, they got a grip on the road to get up the hills by digging into the snow and mud, the twin curses of New England weather.

The Bugs, or Beetles, did pretty much what they were expected to do. They were cheap to buy, pretty cheap to fix, and cheap to run. They were also miserable by design. They were cold in winter, hot in summer, noisy at all speeds, and cramped for anyone over five feet tall. They could easily have been made warm in winter, because after all the engines were air-cooled. Porting some of the hot air, blown out into the atmosphere, up to the suffering passengers, would have been an engineering trick of a few minutes. VW didn’t do this.

So we were cold and miserable getting to work in the refreshing Vermont winter mornings. And unsafe because there was no defroster worth a damn. Supposedly some air had been directed at the windshield by running ducts up front from the engine through the rocker panels under the doors. Guess what? The defrosted air was well cooled by the time it reached the windshield, and therefore useless. And the rocker panels rotted quickly in the Vermont salt — another design plus.

The Volkswagen Beetle or Bug was a reminder that you were poor, that this was all you could afford, that you drove this minimalist machine while others cruised happily by in an American boat, maybe a Ford, with the heater blasting. Naturally, we VW victims turned the whole experience into a virtue, possibly the mental result of near-hypothermia. Or possibly carbon monoxide poisoning, another product of the heating system.

The rear engine design meant the gas tank had to be placed in front of the dashboard. In a head on collision everyone was covered with gasoline. This in some subtle way reminded us that Adolf Hitler was responsible for the initial development of the car. Early versions had no gas gauge. If you ran out of gas, there was a reserve tank that you opened with a small valve under the steering wheel. This released another gallon to get you to a gas station. A nice simple design, except that the valve often leaked on the driver’s shoes.

VW Bugs rusted at a rate unequaled even by the standards of American manufacturers. A design feature was that the parts, fenders, running boards, quarter panels (and so on) were easily replaceable if they got rusty. A few nuts and bolts, and you were good to go. This theory was a selling point, but failed in practice, since the entire car rusted at an even rate, even the places where you were supposed to bolt the replaceable parts on. But the engine made so much noise that you couldn’t hear the body rattles, until, of course, it was too late.

The engine was good for maybe 50,000 miles. It was an environmental nightmare, horribly inefficient, unevenly cooled so that one cylinder (I forget which one now) always burned out before the rest. The linkage to the clutch (no automatic transmission for you!) was sloppy and prone to rust. The other controls were in constant need of adjustment, tightening, oiling, and generally fiddling with. The brakes were the bare minimum, although the car was light enough that some stoppage was available by opening the door and dragging your foot.

VW did not make what would have been easily made changes to the design. They could have fixed the heater. They didn’t. They could have stopped the oil leaks. They didn’t. They could have countered the rust. They didn’t. The inhuman aspects of the VW Bug went uncorrected for years. The price remained low, but as in the case of Henry Ford’s stubborn refusal to improve the Model T, the low price was not a sufficient lure after you had three or four. (As I say, I had six Bugs, which may say something about my intelligence. My excuse is Vermont teachers’ pay.)

For a period after VW sold the design and the machinery to the government of Mexico (shades of the Zimmermann Telegram!), VW tried one disastrous improvement after another. They lost market share in the U.S. and Europe precipitously. They were saved, unremarkably, by the German government. Slowly, their designs improved and they elbowed their way back to success.

Volkswagen is now a colossal enterprise. Their new cars are pretty luxurious, and they’re clearly not people’s cars, certainly not the people I was back in the 70s. Companies change and customers change. Even so, I remember what VW was. The Bug was inhuman, noisy, cold in winter, hot in summer, stubborn in its refusal to improve, and unsafe. But the main difference between the clattery, rusty, underpowered, wheezing, cramped, and funny-looking Bugs I drove, and the Volkswagens of today is that the Bugs were honest. They didn’t promise anything they didn’t deliver. They didn’t try to fool you into thinking you were in a higher class than you were. You didn’t actually grow to love them, but you appreciated the steady urge they produced to graduate up to something better. And now, as we realize, that won’t be a Volkswagen.

After my last Bug I bought a Subaru. Mostly for the heater.

Jeff Danziger is a political cartoonist. He recommends E. B. White’s essay on the Model T, “Farewell, My Lovely”, viewable online at The New Yorker.

More New Vehicles Get Forward-Crash Prevention Systems

More New Vehicles Get Forward-Crash Prevention Systems

By Jerry Hirsch, Los Angeles Times (TNS)

More cars are coming equipped with robotic functions that protect drivers from front-end crashes with other vehicles or objects, which could result in fewer crashes and lower insurance rates for drivers.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety said 52 percent of the 784 new vehicle models come with technology that alerts a driver to a pending crash as either a standard or optional feature.

Among 2015 models, 27 percent also offer robotic braking, which automatically slows or stops the vehicle without driver intervention if a crash is imminent. That’s more than twice as many as in the 2012 model year.

“Automatic braking is an accessible technology that’s within reach for many drivers,” said David Zuby, the insurance institute’s executive vice president and chief research officer. “That’s a welcome sign for highway safety and helps pave the way for the eventual deployment of fully autonomous vehicles.”

Early studies are finding the technology is effective. Front-crash prevention systems use cameras, radar and laser sensors to judge whether a vehicle is getting too close to one in front of it. Most systems issue a warning and pre-charge the brakes to maximize their effect if the driver responds by braking, while others have robotic braking.

Automatic braking systems slash front-end crashes 14 percent compared with the same vehicles that don’t offer the feature, according to the institute’s research. Vehicles that only alert drivers to a potential crash, but don’t stop the car, cut collisions 7 percent.

Although the trade group has not measured the technology’s effect on insurance premiums, it believes that fewer crashes will soon be reflected in lower rates, said Russ Rader, an institute spokesman.

Mike Doerfler, Progressive’s product development manager, said the insurer “is starting to lower rates for vehicles with stability control, adaptive headlights and forward-collision warning with braking. We’re introducing that on a state-by-state basis.”

But Rader said vehicle design will influence which vehicles eventually realize premium savings. Many automakers are putting the crash-prevention sensors behind the grille in the front end where they’re vulnerable to being damaged.

“The sensors are expensive to replace, so that can offset the cost benefits of fewer crashes,” he said.

Some manufacturers are making adjustments and moving the sensors to the windshield ahead of the rear-view mirror, where they’re better protected, Rader said.

The insurance group tested the systems and rated the vehicles as basic, advanced or superior for front-crash prevention depending on whether they offer autobrake and, if so, how effective it proves in tests at 12 mph and 25 mph.

Typically, these systems are offered on luxury vehicles or as expensive options. But some automakers, including Mercedes-Benz and Toyota, are making them standard or offering the features as part of a comparatively lower-cost safety-oriented option package.
Toyota, for example, plans to offer safety-package options for nearly every Toyota and Lexus vehicle sold in the U.S. by the end of 2016. The packages will sell for $300 to $500 for Toyotas and $500 to $635 for Lexus models.

Mercedes-Benz is the first automaker to offer a standard front-crash-prevention system that earns the “superior” rating in IIHS test track evaluations. The system comes on Mercedes’ 2015 C-Class, CLA and E-Class.

The technology is catching on with more mainstream nameplates. Seven of the 19 superior- or advanced-rated models in the institute’s latest testing round are moderately priced: Chrysler 300; Dodge Charger; Mazda 6 and CX-5; and Volkswagen Golf, Golf SportWagen and Jetta.

In the latest testing, 14 new models earned the superior rating and five won the advanced rating.

The “superior” vehicles included the 2016 Acura ILX, MDX, RDX and RLX; 2016 BMW X3; 2015 Chrysler 300 and its twin, the 2015 Dodge Charger; 2015 Mercedes-Benz C-Class, CLA and E-Class; and the 2016 Mazda 6 and CX-5. The vehicles rated advanced for front-crash prevention were the 2016 Volkswagen Golf, Golf SportWagen, Jetta and 2015 Volkswagen Touareg.

BMW’s X3 earned an advanced rating when equipped with BMW’s camera-only system, called City Braking Function, and is rated superior when equipped with a camera- and radar-based system.

Acura was pleased with the results.

“Acura is committed to implementing the AcuraWatch suite of safety and driver-assistive technologies on all models, and the recent IIHS results further validates our effort to remain the safety leader in the luxury segment,” said Gary Robinson, manager of Acura product planning.

Photo: Cars undergo Insurance Institute for Highway Safety tests of forward-collision avoidance systems. (Photo courtesy IIHS/TNS)

A Trip Down Route 66 With A Boatload Of Old Cars, Busload Of Gearheads

A Trip Down Route 66 With A Boatload Of Old Cars, Busload Of Gearheads

By John Reinan, Star Tribune (Minneapolis) (TNS)

If you ever plan to motor west,
Travel my way, take the highway that’s the best,
Get your kicks on Route 66.
— Bobby Troup

I’m rocketing down a two-lane country road outside Amarillo, Texas, in the sidecar of a Russian army motorcycle. It’s nearly midnight, and we’re blasting through the hot, dry Panhandle darkness in search of a man named Bill who might have a tappet for a Buick straight-eight engine.

Miles behind us, flashlights and lanterns in a Holiday Inn parking lot illuminate scattered clusters of guys drinking beer and swearing as they wrestle with the innards of cars that could have been bought new by their great-grandfathers.

Sleep is still hours away, and the early morning will see us off on another leg of a 2,300-mile journey down the Mother Road from St. Louis to Los Angeles.

Just another day — and night — on the Great Race.

Since 1983, dozens of vintage cars and trucks have set out each year on this epic cross-country road rally, held annually in a different part of the country. This year, more than 115 vehicles paid the $5,000 entry fee to join the trip down fabled Route 66 during the last week of June.

It’s a rolling museum of America’s auto heritage. Each morning, the caravan heads west through weather that grows hotter by the day, reaching a high of 118 degrees in the Arizona desert. Each evening around dinnertime, it pulls into a town along the historic highway for an overnight stop.

The cars roll through that day’s finish as townspeople — sometimes hundreds, sometimes thousands — gawk and snap photos. We park on Main Street or in the town square for a few hours to let the people look at and touch machines that once were as common on the roads as Hondas and Subarus are today.

Cars from 1972 and earlier are eligible for the race; this year, the oldest entry is a 1911 Hudson. There’s a healthy contingent of newer cars from the ’60s — mostly Mustangs and muscle cars. But many of the cars in the race were made by companies that have been dead for decades, such as Studebaker, Packard and Edsel.

Our car, too, is from a defunct manufacturer. It’s a 1932 Auburn owned by my younger brother, Jerome. It was custom-built to race in the Indianapolis 500, but crashed in practice and never made the race. A man from upstate New York plucked it off a junk heap, repaired it, put a Buick engine in it, and raced it on small-town dirt tracks in the 1950s and ’60s.

With its wire wheels, Art Deco body and eight snorting exhaust pipes bursting from under the hood, the car is a fan favorite in every city we pull into.

The cars and their drivers travel up to 300 miles a day and earn points not for raw speed, but for following a precise course in a set amount of time. The closer your time is to the target each day, the better your score. The teams must find their way by following cryptic instructions, like, “Drive for 12 minutes at 45 mph and turn right at the white church.”

There are two in the race car: a driver and a navigator. The rest of us — five in all, including my older brother, Tom — are the support crew. We trail behind in a 40-foot bus, pulling a giant trailer loaded with tools, auto supplies, our Russian motorcycle and a spare 1970 Toyota we’re hauling for a Japanese team. Our rig, with trailer, is as long as a semi and we’ve all had to learn on the fly how to maneuver it without killing anybody, including ourselves.

It’s a job that I imagine is something like being a roadie on a rock tour. We schlep gear; fix things that break (and old cars are always breaking); keep the coolers full of water, Gatorade and beer. We make motorcycle runs for oil, spark plugs and midnight tappets. There’s no time for sightseeing. Each day, we arrive early to set up, then stay late to tear down. We occasionally drink to excess. The next day, we do it all over again.

But instead of Mick and Keith, our stars are a bunch of mostly white, mostly middle-aged men with big bellies and an inexhaustible storehouse of automotive knowledge.

These are guys who’ll drop and replace a transmission as nonchalantly as you or I would repot a plant. They can listen to a car and instantly diagnose any problem, be it a cylinder, a solenoid or a spindle gear. Their powers of jury-rigging are awe-inspiring; they can almost always cobble together a quick fix that allows a busted car to limp to the next stop.

Me? I’m really good at holding flashlights, fetching wrenches and handing beers to the guys under the hood.

But I do vaguely resemble a real mechanic in the powder-blue jumpsuit our team wears, the one with the embroidered logo reading “WTF: Wandering Troubadours of Finland.” (Our mom was a Finn.) We, too, are fan favorites, meeting our car at the finish line every day and jogging the last hundred yards with it, waving Finnish battle flags as the crowd goes wild.

The Great Race motto is: “To finish is to win.” Our motto is: “To be Finnish is to win.”

We don’t win, of course. For the top teams in the race, road rallies are a serious hobby. The driver-navigator teams practice together year-round. They can drive for 10 or 12 hours, follow the Byzantine directions and arrive at the day’s destination within five seconds of the allotted time. There’s fierce competition among about a dozen teams for the $50,000 first prize.

Our driving team — Jerome and my cousin Chris — encounters an ever-changing parade of glitches. A wheel breaks one day. On another, the speedometer dies, a vital tool in a race where you calculate your speed and mileage constantly. Yet another day, they face a 170-mile trip through Death Valley — in a car that gets about 8 miles per gallon and has a normal range of 140 miles per tank.

Nursing it carefully and using every fuel-saving trick in the book, they make it through the desert with barely a coating of gas left in the tank. The temperature in the cockpit that day: 163 degrees.

Finally, with smoke pouring from a burned-out clutch, we cross the finish line on the famous Santa Monica Pier outside Los Angeles. It’s a feat not achieved by about 25 teams that dropped out during the nine-day trip from St. Louis. And at the awards banquet that night, we get a real surprise.

The eight Japanese teams, including several drivers who are their nation’s equivalents of Richard Petty or Dale Earnhardt Jr., are giving a special friendship award to the American team that showed them the most encouragement and camaraderie. One of their team managers makes the presentation, speaking in Japanese.

When he gets to the end of his speech, there’s no doubt of the winners. In English, he shouts: “Team Ghostbusters!”

Still wearing our jumpsuits _ by now emanating a potent aroma of sweat, oil and beer _ we troop to the stage to accept the award.
The trip home is an anticlimax. Our bus breaks down in the Rockies at 2 o’clock in the morning and we have to get it towed 120 miles to the nearest town with a diesel mechanic. It’s no problem; my brother, its owner, lives in Denver and he can come pick it up in a couple of weeks. We fly home and get back to real life.

Jerome and several of the others already have signed up for next year. I’m dropping out for a while; my child is close to college age and I want to spend more time at home the next couple of summers.

But if you ever see what looks like a middle-aged mechanic strolling around Minneapolis in a weird jumpsuit, say hello. He can’t fix your car, but he’s got some good stories to tell.

Photo: Old and new transportation modes cross paths in San Bernardino, Calif. (John Reinan/Minneapolis Star Tribune/TNS)