Tag: democratic presidential candidates
No, Democrats Don’t Need Their Own Donald Trump

No, Democrats Don’t Need Their Own Donald Trump

Our vote for president is the most “personal” vote we Americans get to cast. We’re far more likely to base our choice for the U.S. House or the Senate on issues — such as health care costs, immigration or the environment — than we are our presidential choice. In a presidential campaign, we voters are beneficiaries or victims of an information overload. We learn about each White House nominee — often from her or his siblings — whether Mom liked her best or whether the other kids in the family agreed he was a “teacher’s pet” and, even worse, a sneaky “goody two-shoes.” We form opinions on whether the nominee is capable of laughing at himself, someone we would personally like and, more importantly, trust in a personal crisis.

But Democrats looking to 2020 appear unaware of this “personal” determinant in our presidential decisions. Many of them are instead, it seems, in search of some Democratic version of Donald Trump — a candidate who can go toe-to-toe, insult-to-insult with the bellicose Republican incumbent. Nothing could be more disastrous for Democrats’ victory prospects than to find and nominate their own practitioner of scorched-earth, take-no-prisoners politics.

That is exactly what American voters are not looking for in the White House. Think about it: Here is an incumbent president running for reelection at a time of historic American economic prosperity. The U.S. unemployment rate is the lowest in 50 years (since the nation’s economy was fueled by the Vietnam War). The unemployment rate for Asian Americans just reached a new historic low. The unemployment rate for adult men and adult women is an identically low 3.3 percent. Average hourly wages have grown 3.1 percent over the last year. Yet, in spite of those politically positive numbers, Trump has never once — in any day of his presidency — been rated favorably by a majority of his fellow Americans.

It turns out that it’s not just the economy, stupid. Americans’ vote for president remains deeply personal. When the respected Wall Street Journal-NBC News poll asked voters how they would “rate Donald Trump on the following qualities,” the results were enough to make every Republican precinct captain terminally nervous. By better than 2-to-1 (58 percent to 28 percent), 2019 voters do not see the Republican president as “being honest and trustworthy, or “having high personal and ethical standards” (58 percent negative, 24 percent positive). In the Gallup poll, barely 1 out of 3 Americans (35 percent) saw Trump “as someone they admire.” In the trusted Pew poll, only 13 percent found that President Trump’s comments often leave them “inspired,” and 45 percent reported they were never “inspired.” Are you “proud” when you hear Trump speak? Sixteen percent say they often are, but 47 percent answer “never.”

The ancient Greek historian Herodotus gave Americans and Democrats the wisest political advice some 25 centuries ago when he told us that “character is destiny.” Americans are living in boom times.

They give the man in the White House high marks for his economic stewardship. But what American voters are desperately seeking in 2020 is a national leader who can earn and keep our trust, whose word we can believe, whom we can admire, whom we can look to — especially for our children and grandchildren — as an example of decency and integrity, someone we can occasionally even be inspired by and whom we can actually like. Forget the 13-point federal program for free nasal hair removal and instead let us see your character.

Why Most Democrats Running For President Should Just Quit Now

Why Most Democrats Running For President Should Just Quit Now

In youth sports, each season ends up with participation trophies handed out so everyone feels like a winner. In the Democratic presidential campaign, I propose to hand out participation trophies at the beginning so the sure losers can get out of the race immediately, if not sooner.

At the moment, it’s easier to make a list of the Democrats who are not running than the ones who are. The number of declared and likely contenders is fast approaching the usual attendance at the Romney family reunion.

For all but one or two of these ambitious individuals, the process will mean months of constant travel, awkward conversations, bad meals, forgettable speeches, humiliating attempts to raise money and finally crushing defeat. Most of them should act now to spare themselves, and us, that protracted pain.

A large number have as much business in a presidential contest as I do at a Chippendales audition. To the average voter, the names Jay Inslee, Pete Buttigieg, John Delaney, and Jeff Merkley mean nothing today, and they will mean nothing this time next year.

If you are a complete unknown, you are wasting your time and ours to think you have a prayer of becoming president in 2020. I could provide a list of past failed candidates whom you resemble, but trust me, you wouldn’t recognize them.

Donald Trump apparently inspired a host of Democrats who think his elevation to the White House proves that anything can happen in a presidential contest. In truth, many things cannot happen in a presidential contest, and those things include the victory of Andrew Yang, Tim Ryan, Tulsi Gabbard, or Eric Swalwell.

But you don’t have to be an unknown to realize you would be doing the country a favor by excusing yourself. At 6 feet, 5 inches, New York Mayor Bill de Blasio has a better chance of playing in the NBA than becoming president. But the same could be said of Eric Holder, who is just 5’11”.

Beto O’Rourke is believed to be planning to run, and Stacey Abrams has heard calls for her to join the race. Let me just stop them there.

Both showed considerable promise in their losing races for statewide office. But here’s a simple rule: You have to win to get a shot at the presidency. If you lose, you don’t ask for a promotion.

Yes, Abraham Lincoln lost an 1858 Senate race before gaining the Republican presidential nomination in 1860. I have news for these two: Neither is the reincarnation of Abraham Lincoln.

Some of the above may think that the primaries offer a path to the vice presidency. But you don’t need to run for president if you have the stuff to make a suitable match with the nominee. See: Mike Pence, Tim Kaine, Paul Ryan, Sarah Palin and Dick Cheney.

In addition to the wannabes in the field, there are the has-beens, lingering long after their sell date. When Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders and Michael Bloomberg were born, Franklin Roosevelt was in his third term. John Kerry and Hillary Clinton had their chance, which will not come again.

The Democrats who have a legitimate claim to be in the race are those with a combination of experience, achievements, political savvy and persuasive talent. In this category, I put Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, Kirsten Gillibrand, Cory Booker, Amy Klobuchar, Julian Castro, Sherrod Brown and John Hickenlooper. This assortment is varied enough in ideology, background, gender and race to satisfy almost any Democratic taste.

For the others to put themselves forward would only clog the track with distracting dilettantes. The problem resembles the confusion shoppers feel when they go to the grocery and are overwhelmed by the profusion of options.

Two candidates are better than one, and five may be better than two. But 10 or 20 are a traffic jam. All those minor candidates won’t win, but they will make it harder for voters to sort through others to find the right one.

Steve Chapman blogs at http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chapman. Follow him on Twitter @SteveChapman13 or at https://www.facebook.com/stevechapman13. To find out more about Steve Chapman and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.