Tag: epstein scandal
 Laura Loomer

'No Coming Back': Loyalist Loomer Sternly Warns Trump Against Maxwell Pardon

Far-right conspiracy theorist and self-described "proud Islamophobe" Laura Loomer often attacks fellow MAGA Republicans for not being pro-Donald Trump enough. Loomer considers herself Trump's "loyalty enforcer," even attacking Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia) — who is way to the right — and accusing her of being impure in her devotion to Trump and the MAGA agenda.

But now, Loomer is voicing some criticism of Trump in response to comments he made during a White House press conference on Monday, October 6.

When CNN's Kaitlin Collins asked Trump if he would consider a federal pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell — who is serving a 20-year prison sentence for her role in the late Jeffrey Epstein's sex crimes — the president said he would "have to look at it" and added, "I haven't heard the name in so long."

In an October 6 post on X, formerly Twitter, Loomer wrote, "I strongly advise AGAINST anyone lobbying the Trump admin and the DOJ to Pardon Ghislaine Maxwell. Do not do it. I repeat. Do not do it. There will be no coming back from that. I repeat again. For the love of God. Do Not Do It @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @PamBondi."

Loomer's tweet is receiving a lot of reactions on X.

Olga Lautman, a senior fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA), tweeted, "Would think you would be demanding the release of the files."

Self-described "constitutional conservative" Kelly McCarty wrote, "Why wouldn’t Trump's first instinct be to say there’s absolutely no chance of a pardon from him?"

X user Laura Johnson posted, "It would be a huge stain on this POTUS. Same for Sean Combs. Don't do it. Both of these criminals have abused women. We need the female vote. Keep that mind!"

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

Trump Is Trying To Make Us Forget The Epstein Scandal -- So Don't

Trump Is Trying To Make Us Forget The Epstein Scandal -- So Don't

"Never again will the immense power of the state be weaponized to persecute political opponents," Donald Trump declared at his 2025 inauguration. Hold that thought.

Trump is now using the immense power of the state to distract from a scandal that could bring him down. That is, his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, a fiend who sexually trafficked girls young enough to be in junior high.

Watch how Trump uses the power of the state to change the subject. Note how his weaponizing of government to go after foes — or just attract attention — escalates into sheer spectacle.

It's no longer just insulting celebrities. No, he needs the big guns to force attention away from deeper questions about his close dealings with Epstein. He needs to send the National Guard into cities that didn't want them, bomb boats that may or may not be carrying drug smugglers and send immigrants who may or may not be undocumented to third-country dungeons.

News channels have jumped all over FCC Chairman Brendan Carr's mafioso threats against news media that don't do Trump's bidding. He apparently intimidated ABC/Walt Disney into firing Jimmy Kimmel after the late-night comedian made comments at odds with state-sanctioned opinion. Carr used to make fiery defenses of free speech.

This is a serious story, but critics shouldn't let Trump lead them astray from the story that undoubtedly terrifies him: his relationship with the predator who provided rich men with underage sexual partners.

Ignore Carr. He is a toady, a hollow man barren of principle. And did Attorney General Pam Bondi claim that the state could investigate businesses that refused to print memorial vigil posters for Charlie Kirk? Yes, but not gonna happen.

The burning question isn't whether Trump knew Epstein, liked Epstein or even partied with him. We know he did all those things, but those activities are not necessarily criminal.

The question is whether he participated in the sexual abuse of minors. Proof that Trump availed himself of Epstein's young adolescents has yet to be produced. But evidence that he may have is piling up.

Many questions could be answered in the release of all the Epstein files. Trump used to call for that, but when the possibility drew near, he invented a new story: The files are part of a Democratic hoax.

That didn't get much traction. Recent polls show at least 80 percent of the public — including independents and many Republicans — wants all the documents released.

Another hint that Trump may have been deeply involved is his treatment of Ghislaine Maxwell, who recruited and groomed Epstein's victims. Convicted of the sex trafficking of minors, among the most serious federal crimes, Maxwell was sentenced to 20 years in prison. Why was she summarily moved to a low-security facility that offered Pilates?

Upon Maxwell's arrest in 2020, Trump responded, "I wish her well, frankly." He clearly wants her on his side.

How can Trump explain the affectionate birthday letter he sent to Epstein? It contained typewritten text, a drawn outline of a naked woman and the signature "Donald" written in a way that resembled pubic hair. The letter was reported by The Wall Street Journal, a conservative Murdoch-controlled publication that treads carefully.

We can expect Trump's diversions to become ever more flamboyant as information dribbles out about Epstein's clientele. There's no accounting for the elastic moral standards of Trump's most slavish devotees, but even some of them might have trouble with the sexual abuse of 14 year-olds.

Countering the immense power of the state to distract the public is not easy. But we must. We should ask what ought to concern us more, comedians or sex traffickers of young teens. You choose.

Froma Harrop is an award winning journalist who covers politics, economics and culture. She has worked on the Reuters business desk, edited economics reports for The New York Times News Service and served on the Providence Journal editorial board.

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

J.D. Vance

Epstein, Trump, And The Bottomless Moral Void Of MAGA

The rush to exonerate Trump from the implications of the Epstein birthday book message reveals a contradiction at the heart of MAGA.

In the immediate aftermath of the Wall Street Journal scoop about the smarmy message Trump included in the book of friendly tributes assembled in 2003 for Jeffrey Epstein's fiftieth birthday, Vice President JD Vance rode to his defense, calling the reporting "complete and utter bulls—-," an echo of his master's words. Trump had said, "This is not me. This is a fake thing. It's a fake Wall Street Journal story. I never wrote a picture in my life."

Vance could have stopped there, having fulfilled his loyal henchman duty, but he continued with words that haven't aged well in two months. "Where is this letter?" Vance tweeted. "Would you be shocked to learn they never showed it to us before publishing it? Does anyone honestly believe this sounds like Donald Trump?"

Where is the letter? Well, the birthday book has now wound up on front pages all over the world. The House Oversight Committee had subpoenaed it from the Epstein estate and has released images from it — complete with Trump's unmistakable signature over the pubic region of a female form. So that's where the supposedly nonexistent book is.

As for Vance's second question, is he serious? Of course, it sounds like Trump. He's a person of low character with a severe case of arrested development. He taunts political opponents, journalists and foreign leaders with middle school insults, brags about "inspecting" naked teenage beauty pageant contestants, and ranks women on how rape-worthy they are. Do you really think such a person is incapable of lewd chortling with a fellow perv about his "wonderful secret"?

Vance, the vanguard of those defending Trump's honor, was soon joined by the MAGA minions. Laura Loomer called the story "totally fake." "Time for @newscorp to open that checkbook, it's not his signature. DEFAMATION!" tweeted White House deputy chief of staff Taylor Budowich. Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL) also declined to see reality, insisting, even after the publication of the image in which Trump's signature is clear as day, "What I see is not his signature. I've seen Donald Trump sign a million things." Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) likewise sees only what the tribe permits: "Anybody can do a signature. To me, it's just bogus. The whole thing is bogus right now."

Others recirculated Trump's dubious accounts of why he kicked Epstein out of Mar-A-Lago, and Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) offered that the president had actually been acting as an FBI informant, dropping a dime on Epstein (a claim he walked back last Monday), but still maintains that the story is "much ado about nothing."

Yes, they all look foolish now, but that's only part of the point.

At the heart of the case for Trump has always been the notion that, sure, he's rough around the edges, but we have to put aside our piddling character concerns and just be glad that he is so strong, because the left presents such an existential threat to America that we cannot survive without Trump. It was always the Flight 93 election. When you are drowning, you don't question whether the man throwing you a life preserver is a decent person or not, you're just grateful he's there.

They knew Trump was a louse. They knew he lied, betrayed his business partners and his wives, spread false rumors, played dirty and did it all without a flicker of conscience. When Trump's character was raised as an issue by opponents, the knee-jerk MAGA response was not to defend him, not really, but to stress the enormity of the Democrats.

This carried them through Trump's escalation of offenses — from bullying and lying to inciting a rebellion, to standing by while a murderous mob hunted his opponents (including his vice president), to the machine-gun fire he's now spraying at our institutions. We need a tough guy, they say, because the Democrats are so dangerous.

But now they find themselves defending Trump against the one sin that has given their movement its chief moral stature: child abuse. It was QAnon, Pizzagate, and other iterations of the vast child abuse conspiracy that reassured MAGA that no matter what Trump did, the other side was always worse. Thus, the obsessive focus on Jeffrey Epstein.

And it appears that Trump was more than a little accepting of Epstein's crimes. He actually found them amusing. Not only that, he wrote in the birthday message that he and Epstein "have certain things in common."

For a decade, MAGA and most of the GOP have excused every Trump outrage on the grounds that America needed him to counter a widespread Democratic conspiracy to victimize innocent children. But the only powerful figure to be tainted by the Epstein revelations is Trump himself. No claims of "we need a tough guy" or whataboutism can square this circle.

Mona Charen is policy editor of The Bulwark and host of the "Beg to Differ" podcast. Her new book, Hard Right: The GOP's Drift Toward Extremism, is available now.

Reprinted with permission from Creators

Trump's Icky Birthday Message To Epstein Is All Too Real

Trump's Icky Birthday Message To Epstein Is All Too Real

As it turns out, all of President Donald Trump’s Truth Social temper tantrums about his lewd birthday card to Jeffrey Epstein might have been done in vain.

On Monday, after receiving the Epstein estate files, the House Oversight Committee's Democrats posted what they claims to be the actual birthday card that Trump sent to Epstein.

“We got Trump’s birthday note to Jeffrey Epstein that the President said doesn’t exist,” the committee minority wrote on X.“Trump talks about a ‘wonderful secret’ the two of them shared. What is he hiding? Release the files!”

Part of alleged Epstein "birthday card" from Donald Trump released by House Oversight Committee Screenshot from NBC News

The card, which features a silhouette of a woman’s torso drawn over an alleged conversation between the two longtime friends, first surfaced in July when the Wall Street Journal got wind of an album of vulgar letters that Epstein received for his 50th birthday.

“We have certain things in common, Jeffrey,” the card denoted above another line in which Epstein agreed with Trump.

Just above Trump’s signature, which oddly resembles pubic hair, Trump reportedly wrote, “Happy Birthday—and may every day be another wonderful secret.”

When news first broke, Trump worked overtime to denounce and delegitimize what the Journal claimed were his own words.

“This is not me. This is a fake thing. It’s a fake Wall Street Journal story,” he told the publication. “I never wrote a picture in my life. I don’t draw pictures of women. It’s not my language. It’s not my words.”

Soon after, Trump—who has previously sold his sketches for tens of thousands of dollars—filed a $10 billion lawsuit against the Journal, which is owned by Rupert Murdoch. While it’s unclear how the lawsuit will hold up following this latest development, Trump’s messaging around the Epstein scandal has been transitory at best since his name became attached to it.

From insisting that he would be a driving force in releasing the files to saying that the files themselves are a “hoax” created by the left, Trump’s stance has been anything but consistent.

“From what I understand, I could check, but from what I understand, thousands of pages of documents have been given. But it's really a Democrat hoax because they're trying to get people to talk about something that's totally irrelevant to the success that we've had as a nation since I've been president,” he said last week.

Trump’s denial has even pushed some of his GOP supporters, like Reps. Nancy Mace of South Carolina and Marjorie Taylor Green of Georgia, to break with the president.

“We campaigned on transparency issues like ‘release the Epstein files,’” Greene said to reporters last week. “And all of a sudden there’s this hard stance coming from the Republican leadership and many of the members and the administration, and I’m shocked by it. I think it’s a major misstep. It is an uncalculated error that is going to have ramifications directly in the midterms.”

In step with Epstein survivors, even the most loyal MAGA politicians have found themselves opposing the president because of his refusal to be transparent.

“The truth needs to come out,” Greene said. “And the government holds the truth.”

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World