Tag: gop gerrymander
Liz Cheney

Are Women More Committed To Democracy And Fairness Than Men?

This is a generalization, I know. As Mark Twain is said to have said, "All generalizations are false, including this one." But there is growing evidence that women tend to be more protective of our American democracy than men. They are more willing to put their foot down when partisan schemers try to game the electoral system, mostly by changing the rules or gerrymandering.

A recent sign that women place more value on being a force for good comes out of conservative Utah. Both parties gerrymander, that is, draw voting district boundaries to give unfair advantage to their candidates. But a faith-based group called Mormon Women for Ethical Government wanted to stop that practice. In 2018, they backed Proposition 4, a ballot measure to create an independent districting commission that would prevent gerrymandering. It passed a statewide vote.

The backstory: Utah remains solidly Republican, but its capital, Salt Lake City, has become bluer in recent years. In 2021, the Republican-run legislature drew its own congressional map that split Salt Lake County to favor their party. The women sued.

It takes a certain inner steel to keep things honest when gaming the system might result in a preferred outcome. About 40 percent of the Mormon women's group are registered Republicans, and only 34 percent are Democrats. Their motivation is simply to maintain a level playing field.

"Gerrymandering breaks things," the group's co-executive director Emmy Petty Adams said. "It physically fractures communities. It breaks trust."

The matter has been in and out of courts, and the fight is not over. But because the Utah Supreme Court refused in February to block the new nonpartisan map, the 2026 election will be conducted under the new districts.

Defenders of democratic integrity understand that safeguarding free and fair elections is the best way to guarantee the public good. It's in their interest to ensure that their votes are properly counted.

It was hard to find a more conservative and politically brave House Republican than Wyoming's Liz Cheney. She voted to impeach President Donald Trump after the January 6, 2001 attack on the Capitol and did not flinch before the inevitable blowback. She was also one of only two Republicans to later serve on the House January 6 Select Committee, which investigated the violent rampage and efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

The other Republican was Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, a decorated combat veteran. Cheney ran for another term, undoubtedly knowing that she would lose the Republican primary to Trump's revenge pick. Kinzinger retired from the House.

"If I have to choose between maintaining a seat in the House of Representatives or protecting the constitutional republic," Cheney said shortly before the primary vote, "I'm going to choose the Constitution and the truth every single day."

Over in the Senate, Republicans Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski from Alaska voted to convict Trump for inciting an insurrection. Five Republican men did join them: Richard Burr, North Carolina; Bill Cassidy, Louisiana; Mitt Romney, Utah; Ben Sasse, Nebraska; and Pat Toomey, Pennsylvania.

It's important to note, however, that there were 42 male Republicans in the Senate compared with just eight female Republicans. Thus, the men voting for conviction represented only 12 percent of the male Republican caucus, while the two women represented a quarter of its female members. Four of the men subsequently retired. Cassidy remained in office, but come the primary, Trump punished him by endorsing Rep. Julia Letlow (R-LA). She went on to become Louisiana's Republican Senate nominee. Cassidy gets credit for putting himself before the voters.

Of course, there are plenty of unprincipled women in politics. No need to list them here. The point is that women seem more invested in keeping politics honest, as a generalization, of course.

Froma Harrop is an award winning journalist who covers politics, economics and culture. She has worked on the Reuters business desk, edited economics reports for The New York Times News Service and served on the Providence Journal editorial board.

burnJeffries and Cly

Republican Scheme To Rig Midterm Elections Blocked In Alabama And South Carolina

Republican efforts to rig the 2026 midterm elections by further gerrymandering House districts at the behest of President Donald Trump were dealt two massive blows on Tuesday.

In Alabama, a panel of three federal judges—two of whom were appointed by Trump—blocked the state from using a map that would eliminate one of the state’s two majority-Black districts. The panel ruled that the new map illegally discriminates against Black voters—despite the Supreme Court’s recent ruling that weakened the Voting Rights Act—and that it cannot be used in 2026.

In South Carolina, the state Senate rejected Trump’s demand that the state eliminate its one majority-Black congressional seat, which is held by longtime Democratic Rep. Jim Clyburn.

For now, these actions undercut Republican efforts to fight off an impending blue wave this fall.

In Alabama, the three-judge panel wrote in their decision, “Ultimately, we cannot see our way clear to requiring Alabamians to cast their votes in the 2026 elections under a districting plan tainted by intentional race-based discrimination.”

The ruling continued, “And under the unusual circumstances of this case, we conclude that a limited order requiring the Secretary to continue using this Court’s race-blind map will not disrupt Alabama’s elections (all candidates ran under the race-blind map until fifteen days ago, and all voters remain districted under the race-blind map in electoral computer systems).”

Alabama is already appealing the ruling to the Supreme Court, which has regularly helped stack the deck in favor of Trump and his Republican Party. It is entirely possible the nation’s highest court, filled with right-wing hacks, will reinstate Alabama’s racist map.

“[I]n my mind, it is not a matter of whether we win this case, only when,” Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall, a Republican, said in a statement, telegraphing that he expects the partisan court majority to bless his state’s redraw.

At the moment, however, that represents one fewer seat rigged in favor of Republicans as they desperately try to maintain their narrow House majority.

Meanwhile, South Carolina will officially keep its one Black-majority district after a redraw failed by a vote of 20-24 in the state Senate, with 12 Republicans voting against it.

One Republican who voted against it was conservative Sen. Richard Cash, who said his vote was because voting had already begun in the state’s June 9 primary.

“Neither my conscience nor the common sense will allow me to stop an election that is already underway,” Cash said on the Senate floor.

Democrats taunted Republicans after the GOP’s two election-rigging attempts failed.

“Donald Trump and extreme MAGA Republicans have failed the American people. As a result, the GOP has concluded that the only way they can win in November is to cheat,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said in a statement. “Today, their desperate power grab hit a wall.”

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

Virginia Democrats Push Back On GOP Gerrymanders (And Republicans Are Whining)

Virginia Democrats Push Back On GOP Gerrymanders (And Republicans Are Whining)

Virginia Democrats are giving President Donald Trump and his minions a taste of their own medicine in their redistricting war—and the GOP is pissed.

All five members of Virginia's congressional delegation held a whiny news conference Monday, railing against Democrats’ plan to suspend the state's independent redistricting commission and redraw its U.S. House districts—a move to counter the GOP's gerrymandering efforts.

Yet Virginia Republicans are only speaking out now that Democrats are fighting fire with fire, a move that imperils as many as four of their reelection campaigns.

"Yesterday I stood proudly with my fellow U.S. House Republicans from Virginia, and with members of the Virginia General Assembly in the State Capitol. We ALL agree that what the democrats in Richmond are trying to do is WRONG," GOP Rep. Jen Kiggans (R-VA), who is already facing a difficult reelection, wrote on X. "We will not sit idle as they undermine the constitution of our great Commonwealth. Gerrymandering is wrong and Virginia deserves better."

Virginia Democrats are planning to use the same game plan as California, putting up a ballot measure for permission to suspend the state’s redistricting commission and nix as many as five Republican seats.

"This is about overturning the election results of 2020, pure and simple," GOP Rep. Rob Wittman (R-VA), who is also already facing a difficult reelection, said during the news conference. "They want to deny the voter’s desires to have a bipartisan redistricting commission."

It's rich for Wittman, of all people, to claim that Democrats are trying to overturn election results, as he was one of the 147 congressional Republicans who voted to overturn the actual 2020 results to block Joe Biden's victory.

Rep. Morgan Griffith (R-VA) also spoke during the news conference, admitting that he helped gerrymander Virginia in favor of Republicans back in 2010 when they held eight of the state's 11 congressional seats despite Democrats winning at the presidential level.

"I was a part of partisan redistricting. But the voters of Virginia spoke in 2020 that they didn't like that happening," he said. "They didn't want it, whether it be Republicans or Democrats in the back room. They wanted no more of a partisan redistricting process."

Apparently, Griffith believes in gerrymandering for me but not for thee.

Even Virginia's outgoing GOP Gov. Glenn Youngkin moaned about Democrats' effort, calling it "nuts" and "desperate."

Funny, he didn't say that about Republicans' mid-cycle gerrymandering in other states.

Still, Virginia's Democratic State Senate President Louise Lucas said that Republicans’ bellyaching is just hypocrisy at its finest.

"I served with each of these members of Congress in the General Assembly and this rank hypocrisy only serves to strengthen our position," she wrote on X. "They can join the unemployment line with the federal employees they have turned their backs on."

With California’s redistricting effort poised to sail to victory, Virginia moving to emulate the same results, and Illinois tossing around a plan to redraw their own U.S. House map, it appears that Democrats have finally stopped bringing a knife to a gun fight.

These Democrats finally grew some spines, and hopefully just in time to stop America’s slide into autocracy.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

Behind Those 'Good Government' Flyers Lies Another GOP Deception

Behind Those 'Good Government' Flyers Lies Another GOP Deception

I used to be a real do-gooder. National Board of Common Cause under Archie Cox and Fred Wertheimer; chair of the Massachusetts Ballot Law Commission; professor of election law. I did these things after working in the trenches because I really believed in the possibility of cleaning up the system. Until the Supreme Court got in the way. And, of course, then we happened into a constitutional crisis.

"Gerrymandering is Wrong — No Matter Who Does it," the flyer screamed from my mailbox. Now, that would have had my name on it in 2010, when California did the good-government thing and gave line-drawing to an independent commission. I'm sure I supported it then. But now? With Texas proposing to show up for this knife fight with a sledgehammer, we're going to come with a butter knife?

Who, I wondered, cared enough about good government in the midst of a knife fight to be taking that side?

Or maybe, said the political hack in me, it was just the Republicans playing tricks?

The mailer was sent by ProtectFairElections.org. No leads there. Takes you to a clean website to join the "coalition," but no information on the other coalition members. But in small print — always look for the small print — "Paid for by Right Path California."

What is Right Path California? Its website offers as little insight as ProtectFairElections.org, but with one big difference. Somebody chose to identify herself as the President and CEO of whatever it is, and that someone is Jessica Millan Patterson — and here's the pay dirt — whose most recent job was Chair of the Republican Party of California.

And that, of course, is the problem with the flyer. It's not about good government. This is not a "Sacramento Power Grab"; California's Landmark Election Reform is not "Under Attack by Sacramento Politicians," who everybody loves to hate in the abstract.

Our government reform is under threat by Donald Trump and the states, starting with Texas, that have agreed to his plan to try to subvert the midterm elections. Does he get to change the rules mid-census, as he tried to do last time? If the states won't block him, then California has threatened to match him, or at least match Texas. If their plan doesn't go into effect, neither does Sacramento's. Who is grabbing power from whom?

Texas is poised to keep the House — wrongly — in Republican hands. Two more years like this? And California is supposed to sit silently and let it happen? I don't think so.

Voters are dissatisfied with an opposition party that can't seem to find its footing to oppose an increasingly unpopular president. Who can blame them? My mailbox is filled with deceptive flyers like the one I received, financed by Trump supporters who want to keep Congress his. According to my research, millions are being quietly spent to support the Trump position by groups you and I have never heard of. Where is the Democratic response?

I'm glad California Gov. Gavin Newsom is playing games with Trump's head, but it can't just be Newsom. The Democratic team desperately needs leadership. Right now, like it or not, the leaders are Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY). What does that say about Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY)? Sorry, but they're ineffective. It's not the Sacramento politicians I'm worried about, but the ones in Washington.

Susan Estrich is a celebrated feminist legal scholar, the first female president of the Harvard Law Review, and the first woman to run a U.S. presidential campaign. She has written eight books.

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World