Tag: maha
Dear MAHA Moms: Don’t Be Surprised When Bobby Sells You Out

Dear MAHA Moms: Don’t Be Surprised When Bobby Sells You Out

The fans and followers of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. are now learning what others have known for decades: You can rely on him to lie whenever it is expedient and profitable, and you can’t rely on him to uphold any principle except his own advancement.

That unpleasant jolt of awareness struck the devoted legions of Kennedy’s “Make America Healthy Again” movement when he dropped their priorities in obedience to the corrupt Trump White House. Across the country, stunned “MAHA Moms” and influencers watched their idol Bobby meekly endorse the president’s decision to rapidly increase production of glyphosate – a ubiquitous pesticide they consider deadly.

Back during the 2024 campaign, Trump promised he would empower Kennedy to “ensure that everybody will be protected from harmful chemicals, pollutants, pesticides,” a category that clearly included glyphosate, known commercially as Roundup. In a June 2024 social media post, Kennedy wrote that glyphosate is “one of the likely culprits in America’s chronic disease epidemic…Shockingly, much of our exposure comes from its use as a dessicant [drying agent] on wheat, not as an herbicide…My USDA will ban that practice.” He noted that across Europe, the use of glyphosate is sharply restricted or even banned.

Flash forward to February 18, 2026, when the president issued a directive that not only failed to reduce the use of glyphosate but will rapidly increase its production. Kennedy responded with a wag of his tail and a press release that echoed the usual Trumpian tropes about “America first” (and downplayed any specific mention of the pesticide’s name). Expanding the availability of the substance he had many times denounced as “poison,” he declared, would “protect American families.”

The reaction of Kennedy’s civilian cadre was swift and horrified. Zen Honeycutt of Moms Across America, a grassroots MAHA organization, accused Trump of placing “toxic farming and businesses” ahead of children’s health – and said he had betrayed “every voter who voted for him to [Make America Healty Again].” Kelly Ryerson, an influencer who goes by “Glyphosate Girl” on X, warned that she was seeing “the bottom drop out of MAHA,” a dire warning for Republicans already pessimistic about their midterm prospects.

Perhaps the MAHA masses shouldn’t have been quite so surprised that Bobby sold them out, since this betrayal has been in the wind for months. When the Trump White House released its much-publicized interagency “MAHA report” last year, its hundreds of pages barely mentioned pesticides or toxic chemicals and equivocated on glyphosate, noting that human studies of its carcinogenic effects are “limited.”

Evidently the outraged MAHA moms weren’t listening to Bobby last year when he told a Senate committee that “we [the Trump administration] cannot take any step that will put a single farmer in this country out of business…One hundred percent of corn in this country relies on glyphosate. We are not going to do anything to jeopardize that business model.” (Farmers driven bankrupt by Trump’s tariffs may be excused for being skeptical.)

That is a complete reversal of Kennedy’s stance from the years when he was suing the makers and distributors of glyphosate on behalf of cancer victims and earning millions of dollars for himself from those successful lawsuits. He’s still collecting those fees, according to his most recent financial disclsoures, which show about $2.4 million in referral fees from a law firm handling lawsuits on behalf of individuals who got sick after glyphosate exposure.

The harsh truth behind his first year as health secretary is that Bobby has succeeded most with the least popular aspect of his agenda, the longstanding campaign against vaccines that first marked his turn toward the far right. Abusing his control of the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control, and the National Institutes of Health, he has inflicted grave damage on public health and vaccine research.

Kennedy has far less authority over environmental policy, including the use of toxic chemicals and pollutants such as mercury. Indeed, he has dishonorably silent while Lee Zeldin, the politician appointed by Trump to dismantle the Environmental Protection Agency, oversees ruinous deregulation schemes that insure the spread of mercury, “forever chemicals” and sundry lethal toxins across the American biosphere.

MAHA was always a gauzy construct, serving less as a movement for change than as a handy instrument of deception by manipulative politicians like Trump and his acolyte Kennedy. When Bobby abandoned everything that his family had represented for half a century and pledged fealty to a crooked authoritarian, the eventual denouement should have been obvious. A man who sells out his family legacy is certain to sell out his followers. He just got there even sooner than we expected.

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism (St. Martin's Press, 2024). The paperback version, with a new Afterword, will be published in February 2026.

Reprinted with permission from Creators

RFK JR

RFK Jr. Unleashes Weird Musk Chatbot On Americans Seeking 'REAL FOOD'

If you were weirded out by the extreme close-up convicted rapist Mike Tyson Real Food Super Bowl ad, prepare yourself for new heights—or perhaps depths?—of unpleasant feelings about the whole affair.

No, it’s not because the ad was directed by credibly accused sex pest (and Epstein files denizen, of course) Brett Ratner, fresh off his stunning triumph with Melania. While repulsive, that’s pretty much par for the course for this administration. No, it’s because the official government website, realfood.gov, has a section where you can “Use AI to get real answers about real food.”

Since this is on an official fancy government website and is an official government initiative, surely whatever AI tool is being used must have been trained extensively on health information and have multiple safeguards in place to ensure it will provide healthy, correct advice, right?

Uh, no. It’s Grok. It was always going to be Grok. After NextGov asked about why Grok was giving out official nutrition info on an official government website, the administration simply swapped out “Use Grok to get real answers about real food” for “Use AI to get real answers about real food,” but it still just kicks you right over to Grok after you ask your question.

There’s no warning telling you that you are leaving an official government website, no disclaimer that a random chatbot may provide unsafe or incorrect answers. Though a spokesperson told NextGov that the “publicly available version of Grok” is “also an approved governmental tool,” they didn’t feel like answering questions about how Grok was chosen, whether there is a contract, or what guardrails are in place.

404 Media reported that people quickly figured out you could ask Grok to give you dangerously stupid advice, such as what foods are most comfortable to stick up your butt. Guess there aren’t any guardrails, huh?

In case you’re not feeling that adventurous, the realfood site also has suggested prompts of imaginary people desperate for REAL FOOD, which is somehow always in all caps: “My aging parent lives alone, is on a fixed income, and mostly eats frozen dinners and packaged snacks. I'm worried they're not getting REAL FOOD, but they don't cook much anymore. How can I help them get more REAL FOOD without it being complicated or expensive?”

It appears you are supposed to cut and paste this into the Grokbox and get helpful answers. Doing that with the above prompt gets you the same sort of bog-standard information you would get from a web search: look for senior food programs like Meals on Wheels, try some no-cook healthy meals like Greek yogurt, and so on.

Well, at least that’s not Grok generating child sexual abuse material or telling you to put a zucchini up your ass. Small blessings.

If you ask more than a handful of questions via the realfood Grok prompt, you get a message telling you that you have reached the message limit and that you need to sign up with Grok to continue.

So, an official government website is sending people to a sketchy chatbot owned and controlled by the world’s richest man, and the only way you can take advantage of this oh-so-helpful official government tool is to give your personal information to Elon Musk. Great. That’s a totally normal and cool way for government to work

Grok is also burrowing in at the Department of Defense, but this appears to be the first use of Musk’s nonconsensual sexual deepfake machine in the Health and Human Services Department.

In a normal world, HHS would presumably want to make sure that people were receiving helpful, accurate, expert information about what foods to eat, but under Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the entire idea of expertise is suspect. “Trusting the experts is not a feature of democracy and it’s not a feature of science; it’s a feature of religion and totalitarianism.”

Man, that is bleak.

So, don’t listen to experts. Instead, listen to Grok. Listen to Mike Tyson. Listen to RFK Jr. cosplaying as Mike Tyson? This stuff isn’t just dangerous. It’s offensive.

Having the spokesperson for REAL FOOD be a REAL ADJUDICATED RAPIST in an ad directed by a REAL CREDIBLY ACCUSED SEXUAL HARRASSER that directs you to a REAL NONCONSENSUAL DEEPFAKE CHATBOT that is also a REAL OFFICIAL GOVERNMENTAL TOOL shows a slapdash, disgusting disdain for everyone. Your tax dollars are being lit on fire to reward the worst people for the dumbest things.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

At Kennedy's CDC, Measles Fatalities Are Now Just 'A Cost Of Doing Business'

At Kennedy's CDC, Measles Fatalities Are Now Just 'A Cost Of Doing Business'

Measles is a "cost of doing business," says a highly placed official at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

I'd like to know what business that is.

To be fair, let me finish the CDC principal deputy director's quote. Ralph Abraham said that measles is a cost of doing business "with our borders being somewhat porous for global and international travel."

Thing is, the U.S. saw over 2,200 measles cases in 2025, the highest number since 1991 — when the border was presumably less porous and after the disease had been virtually eradicated. Its latest surge in South Carolina follows outbreaks along the Utah-Arizona border.

Measles is a nasty disease. It causes body temperature to spike above 103 degrees, coughs, fatigue and its famous rash. It can lead to pneumonia, hearing loss and brain damage.

And it can end in death. In high-income countries with good medical care, 1 to 3 people die for every 1,000 measles cases. Children under the age of 5 are at extra risk.

Measles infections are growing in places where large numbers aren't vaccinated against it. In South Carolina's Spartanburg County, only 90 percent of schoolchildren had received the measles, mumps and rubella shots. That sounds like a high percentage, but experts say you need at least a 95 percent vaccination rate to stop the disease's spread in a community.

Donald Trump's director of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is a vaccine skeptic who feeds distrust of medical authorities. He advises taking Vitamin A (including cod liver oil) as a treatment for measles. He also recommends an antibiotic (clarithromycin) and a steroid (budesonide), claiming they had been "shown very effective." Neither works for measles, according to real scientists. Measles is a virus for which there is no cure.

Unnecessary deaths could be deemed a cost of doing business, one supposes. But for bad cases, so is hospitalization requiring oxygen, X-rays, isolation and long stays. It can be more costly if you put a dollar figure on it.

Kennedy's HHS sounds like a Ministry right out of Orwell's 1984, where controlling truth matters more than addressing problems. This cost-of-business talk is another weaponization of reality: The overhead for addressing measles had been largely limited to cheap vaccinations that are free for most schoolchildren. Preventing the disease from spreading in the first place is cost effective, is it not?

Plagues can be a significant cost of doing business. In the 14th century, the Black Death killed more than 50 million Europeans. It spread mainly through fleas hiding on rodents. Science back then couldn't supply an adequate explanation, and so the best minds of the day blamed the horror on divine retribution and planets out of whack.

Be mindful that Kennedy in 2014 left a bear cub corpse in Central Park. That was against the law because dead animals harbor bacteria and parasites, posing a public-health risk. New York City advises anyone coming across a carcass to report it and not touch it. When it is found near a busy path in a place like Central Park, witnesses are urged to call 911.

Well, Bobby just wanted to get rid of the thing and so dropped the bear under bushes to let the taxpayers deal with it. Nowadays, he's a far bigger threat to public health with his attacks on vaccine safety and nutty theories on cures. He deviously sows distrust by urging Americans to first consult with one's health care provider on whether vaccination "is best for your family."

In sum, outbreaks of diseases that used to be rare are without a doubt an added cost. It's a cost of the business of living in Trump's America.

Froma Harrop is an award winning journalist who covers politics, economics and culture. She has worked on the Reuters business desk, edited economics reports for The New York Times News Service and served on the Providence Journal editorial board.

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

RFK's Nutrition Guidelines Advisory Board Rife With Conflicts Of Interest

RFK's Nutrition Guidelines Advisory Board Rife With Conflicts Of Interest

First, a mea culpa. Yesterday, I failed to confirm claims in several news accounts that the Health and Human Services did not issue a scientific report backing the claims contained in the new nutrition guidelines.

In fact, thanks to StatNews reporting this morning, I learned that there was a report titled The Scientific Foundation for the Dietary Guidelines for Americans on the Department of Agriculture website. The 90-page report’s acknowledgements listed as its primary author, Dr. Christopher Ramsden from the National Institute on Aging. He received unnamed “input and revisions” from unnamed persons at the HHS and Agriculture departments.

The report also listed the names of its 9-member scientific review panel with their financial conflicts-of-interest disclosure statements.

So a tip of the hat to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. for fully disclosing that information. But put a dunce cap on his hypocritical head for allowing onto the review panel six reviewers with financial ties to corporate interests with a direct stake in the outcome of the guidelines. There is no evidence that this committee, two-thirds of whom have ties to industry, received vetting under the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1948.

FACA prohibits advisors with conflicts of interest from serving on federal advisory committees unless they have officially received a waiver declaring their expertise essential and unavailable from other, non-conflicted sources. When I went to see if such waivers existed, I learned the General Service Administration’s FACA committee database is currently “not operational.”For the record, here the names, affiliations and financial ties of those six scientific reviewers:

J. Thomas Brenna, Dell Pediatric Research Institute, University of Texas at Austin: Consulting or research fees from Nutricia, a subsidiary of Danone, and the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association/Texas Beef Council; served on a General Mills and Washington Grain Commission panel reviewing healthfulness of grains; lecturer with travel reimbursement from American Dairy Science Association.

Michael Goran, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California: Scientific Advisor to Else Nutrition, Bobbie Labs (infant formula companies) and Begin Health (produces gut health supplements for babies and infants).

Donald Layman, Professor Emeritus, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Consultant fees and/or honoraria from National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, National Dairy Council, and Functional Medicine. Serves on the advisory board of the non-profit Nutrient Institute, which is wholly funded by Nutrient Foods LLC.

Heather Leidy, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin: Honoraria and/or research grants from General Mills’ Bell Institute of Health and Nutrition, National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, National Pork Board and Novo Nordisk. Serves on the advisory boards of General Mills Bell Institute of Health and Nutrition, Rivalz, and National Pork Board.

Ameer Taha, University of California, Davis: Honoraria from the California Dairy Innovation Center; research grants from Fonterra Ltd. (a New Zealand-based dairy cooperative with U.S. operations), California Dairy Research Foundation, and Dairy Management Inc.

Jeff Volek, The Ohio State University: Co-founder and owner of Virta Health (a firm promoting ketogenic diets to reverse diabetes); advisor to Simply Good Foods.

So much for eliminating corporate influence from official government policy, a stated Make America Healthy Again goal. I wonder if RFK Jr. will let his followers know.

Merrill Goozner, the former editor of Modern Healthcare, writes about health care and politics at GoozNews.substack.com, where this column first appeared. Please consider subscribing to support his work.

Reprinted with permission from Gooz News

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World