Tag: north korea
Hannity Resumes Coverage Of Iran War -- And Urges More 'Credit' For Trump

Hannity Resumes Coverage Of Iran War -- And Urges More 'Credit' For Trump

Sean Hannity, an avid hawk and sycophant to President Donald Trump, had largely abandoned discussions of the floundering Iran war in recent weeks. But on Wednesday night, he engaged with the conflict on his Fox primetime show for the first time since late July — and lamented that Trump is not getting sufficient “credit” for his purported success there.

Trump’s administration has spent the past several months in negotiations premised around the U.S. giving Iran sufficient economic benefits to convince them to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, with the Iranian nuclear program that was theoretically the crux of Trump’s decision to launch the war in the first place relegated to nebulous future discussions. With those negotiations apparently going nowhere and Trump himself moving on from them, Hannity has decided to move straight to celebrating Trump’s purported victory.

“Under President Trump’s strong leadership, America is once again leading on the world stage,” Hannity introduced the segment. “By the way, it never gets credit — Iran will never have a nuclear weapon thanks to Donald Trump. Does anyone ever give him credit for that?” (Then-Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard submitted testimony in March that Iran had no nuclear enrichment capability, and a U.S. intelligence assessment reportedly found in May that the war had not affected “the time Iran would need to build a nuclear weapon.”)

Hannity claimed that “Iran has suffered yet another economic setback” via the United Arab Emirates’ announcement that it was cutting off trade ties, saying that Trump “expressed optimism over the situation with Iran” earlier that day. He then aired a clip in which Trump responded to a question about whether he planned to reopen stalled negotiations with Iran by saying: “Maybe at some point, but right now, I think the situation is so good, but maybe at some point. Look, it's very simple.”

The Fox host added, “They are breaking financially. But Iran is not the only regime that the president is holding to account. As he indicated, a meeting with North Korean supreme leader — he's back — little rocket man, Kim Jong-un could come later this year.”

Hannity did not explain how Trump was “holding to account” the North Korean regime by gifting its dictator with a personal meeting after ordering the curtailment of planned U.S.-South Korean joint naval exercises on the grounds that those exercises were “very insulting” to Kim, who the president said “likes me.”

The host then turned to Kevin Corke — who is nominally a news correspondent — to deliver an upbeat report on Trump’s “busy” foreign policy with Iran, North Korea, and Canada. Corke concluded: “And I want you to consider this, Sean, consider all of that that I just shared and compare it to the previous president. And it is unmistakable that we have a president now who is clearly very hard at work for all of us, Sean.”

Hannity’s on-air push to attack Iran reportedly helped sway Trump’s decision to launch the war in February. The Fox host had promised his audience that the fight would be quick and easy, predicting on his March 30 radio show that “it’s going to be on the verge of wrapping up no later than three weeks from today.”

But since July 23, when Hannity predicted Trump was about to order a massive assault on Iran — only for Trump to pull back — the host had pulled back his coverage of the war. Hannity’s only extensive discussion of the Iran war on his Fox show between that segment and Wednesday’s show came during an interview with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu he aired on July 28, according to a review of the Nexis database.

While Hannity was addressing the ongoing war in the Middle East only in passing mentions on his Fox show, Trump again threatened a massive attack before again backing down; transits through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital channel for global trade, remained limited; Iran and Oman closed in on a deal that would impose transit fees for passage through the strait; and reports circulated about poor living conditions on a U.S. aircraft carrier that were due in part to successful Iranian strikes on a U.S. base in Bahrain.

Meanwhile, Fox's Hannity devoted 11 segments and 46 minutes of coverage to the WNBA between July 28 and August 19, according to a Media Matters review.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters

Trump and Hegseth

'Did North Korea Write That?' Trump Blasted For Remarks Praising Communist Regime

President Donald Trump's latest betrayal of a close foreign ally has drawn withering criticism from all corners, with a new piece from MS NOW likening his statement to the words of the infamous dictator he claims to be close with.

Over the weekend, Trump directed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth via a Truth Social post to "substantially reduce" joint military exercises with South Korea, shortly before new ones were set to commence. He argued that participating in them would be seen as "totally inappropriate and hostile" to North Korea, the dictatorship that he claimed has been "unthreatening and respectful."

"Based on the fact that it is too late to cancel, I have instructed Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, to substantially reduce the Joint Military Exercises," the post read.Despite the U.S. lacking any formal relations with North Korea, Trump has long insisted on trying to maintain a close relationship with its leader, Kim Jong-un, one of the many global dictators he has expressed a fondness for. He also implied in his post that the decision was a direct response to South Korea declining to aid in his war with Iran.

Writing for MS NOW on Tuesday morning, national security analyst Kevin Baron chastised Trump's statement, arguing that his "description of North Korea sounds like Kim Jong Un wrote it," and questioning why he is choosing to "be blindly trusting that North Korea’s murderous, prison-state regime has turned a page toward global peace."

"Did North Korea write that message?" Baron asked. "With no intelligence, data or proof provided to back up his assertion, Trump appears to be blindly trusting that North Korea’s murderous, prison-state regime has turned a page toward global peace. With that choice, Trump is unilaterally rejecting American intelligence threat assessments, military preparedness and history. He’s also getting nothing in return for it. That’s his prerogative as commander in chief."

Baron further questioned the wording of Trump's justification for the move, saying that it sounded as if he had only just learned that joint exercises with South Korea were about to take place. He also warned that this abrupt decision will carry a "substantial cost," in "dollars, diplomacy, readiness and morale."

"At best, Trump is playing with fire. At worst, he is willfully endangering American lives, interests and influence for the chance at saving money, based on nothing but a gut feeling," Baron continued.He concluded later: "Trump is always hunting for a bargain, but U.S. security is nothing to bargain with.

"America’s forward-deployed military presence and preparedness with allies including South Korea and Japan are what allow people to live in peace and prosperity there, so that we can do so here. It’s not charity. It’s not a gift. It’s a security umbrella. It’s a multibillion-dollar investment and insurance policy on American prosperity. And it’s the best leverage the world has to deter North Korea from doing something catastrophic. On Sunday, Kim got another unearned gift courtesy of the U.S. president: A free pass to never change."

Reprinted with permission from AlterNet

Trump Foreign Policy Follies: South Korea Goes To The Shakedown Shack

Trump Foreign Policy Follies: South Korea Goes To The Shakedown Shack

President Trump’s latest move to downgrade U.S. involvement in long-planned military exercises with South Korea should make one thing very clear if it was not already. Under Donald Trump, the United States cannot be viewed as a reliable ally by anyone, except for Israel.

Trump has zero respect for the commitments of prior administrations or even treaty obligations. He doesn’t even care about his own commitments, as Canada and Mexico have discovered, as he freely ignores the trade agreement he negotiated in his first term. He does whatever he feels like.

For this reason, one can hope that South Korea was not surprised by Trump’s decision to downsize the joint military exercises with South Korea, as he announced his renewed friendship with Kim Jong Un. For folks with poor memories, Trump has repeatedly touted the “love letter” that the North Korean dictator sent him. He even stole the letter from the White House when he left office in 2021. (The letter is the property of the U.S. government, not Donald Trump.)

The story gets worse. Trump complained that South Korea refused to join the war that he and Israel started with Iran, even though he said he really didn’t need its help. Trump also again claimed the war was to keep Iran from having a nuclear weapon, even though no one in the world, except Trump, seems to think the country is anywhere close to having a nuclear weapon.

The irony of this gets even worse when we consider that Trump’s friend, Kim Jong Un, actually does have nuclear weapons, and likely has the means to deliver them to the United States. The Clinton administration had a multi-nation agreement designed to keep North Korea from getting nuclear weapons, which George W. Bush then abandoned.

There were efforts at a new agreement under Obama, but Trump quickly abandoned these after getting the love letter from Kim. This undoubtedly continues to be a great source of laughter in Pyongyang.

In addition to downgrading the military exercises, Trump also wants more money from South Korea for its defense assistance. On top of seriously overestimating the number of U.S. troops in the country (39,000 in Trump’s head, compared to 28,500 in reality), Trump apparently still has no understanding of the idea of collective defense.

If Trump wants to be able to project force against China, which may not be a good idea, but something he seems to want to do, then having an ally like South Korea is incredibly valuable. Just as the base in Bahrain, which Iran destroyed, was crucial for supporting Trump’s attack on Iran, the bases potentially provided by Korea would be of huge value in a military conflict. But this is a point that is likely too complicated for Donald Trump and his Fox News host Defense Secretary to understand.

Anyhow, the key takeaway for South Korea and the rest of the world is that the United States under Donald Trump cannot be counted on as an ally. And it would be very foolish for any country to view it as one.

Also, when it comes to trade, Trump’s commitments are absolutely meaningless. South Korea pledged $350 billion in investment in the United States in exchange for a modest reduction in the tariff rate that Trump imposed on imports from their country. Given the fact that Trump could raise his tariffs any time he feels like it, South Korea would be wise to keep its investment as a pledge. Only a fool would give something real in exchange for a Donald Trump promise.

Whatever tariff Trump ends up charging on our imports from South Korea is likely to have more to do with how he feels on a given day than any agreement between the two countries. As he continually tells the world, Trump does not care about his commitments. That’s the way he did business and the way he runs the country.

Dean Baker is a senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research and the author of the 2016 book Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer. Please consider subscribing to his Substack.


Vance Invented A 'Fact' About Harvard To Make Himself Really Mad

Vance Invented A 'Fact' About Harvard To Make Himself Really Mad

Vice President JD Vance is either secretly Charles Xavier and can read the mind of every Harvard University employee, or he is making shit up again in order to push a MAGA talking point.

The self-proclaimed hillbilly boldly compared Harvard University to North Korea at the American Compass anniversary gala Tuesday, claiming that “at least 90—probably 95 percent” of Harvard’s faculty voted for Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election.

"But if you ask yourself—a foreign election, a foreign country's election, you say 80% of the people voted for one candidate. You would say, 'Oh, that's kind of weird,’ right? That's like, not a super healthy democracy,” he babbled.

“If you said, 'Oh, 95 percent of people voted for one party's candidate,' you would say, 'That's North Korea,” right, Vance said. “That is impossible in a true place of free exchange for that to happen."

If you’re wondering how Vance acquired these completely made-up voting statistics and decided to draw these connections, you are not alone. Even Fox News noted that the vice president made the claim “without evidence.”

Then again, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. just released an official government report citing fabricated sources, so it’s not unheard of for people in the Trump administration to pull data from thin air.

As for our eye-lined darling, using made-up information to push his longtime vendetta against higher education is just another example of his awkward attempts at being a relatable human.

When Vance was penning thoughts for conservative website National Review, he used vague sources he referred to as “friends” he knew to justify his narrative of the “college trap.”

And when the highly hypocritical Yale Law School grad is not dogging on Harvard, he is struggling to form sentences while interacting with workers at a donut shop to show voters that he, too, is a normal everyday guy who does normal, everyday things.

Then again, Vance can’t even keep his own family or sports fans on his side—so his historic unpopularity makes a lot of sense.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World