Tag: right wing
Kamala Harris

Flailing Right-Wing Media Aren't Ready For Kamala Harris

President Joe Biden’s decision to end his reelection campaign and support Vice President Kamala Harris has sent the right-wing propaganda machine spiraling out of control, with its anti-Biden message honed over the past few years replaced by total chaos.

The right spent years arguing that Biden was an addled old man who is raising the prices Americans pay for gas and groceries while deliberately importing migrants to harm their families. While this litany was typically based in deception and misinformation, it overlapped with the primary concerns of swing voters and helped generate an environment where polls saw the president losing to former President Donald Trump in November.

President Joe Biden’s decision to end his reelection campaign and support Vice President Kamala Harris has sent the right-wing propaganda machine spiraling out of control, with its anti-Biden message honed over the past few years replaced by total chaos.

The right spent years arguing that Biden was an addled old man who is raising the prices Americans pay for gas and groceries while deliberately importing migrants to harm their families. While this litany was typically based in deception and misinformation, it overlapped with the primary concerns of swing voters and helped generate an environment where polls saw the president losing to former President Donald Trump in November.

But Biden upended the race on Sunday, announcing that he would “stand down” his campaign and endorsing Harris for the Democratic presidential nomination. His decision was a blow to the Trump campaign, which had geared its strategy around Biden running for reelection and reportedly believed Biden’s nomination gave Trump the best chance to prevail.

The subsequent hours have revealed that the right is totally unprepared for how to respond to a Harris candidacy. She has been vice president for three years and a prominent senator before that — but it seems as if they’ve never put together a playbook with compelling arguments against her. The resulting morass points to major vulnerabilities in the right-wing propaganda ecosystem.

Fox News scrambled for its opposition research but seemed unable to put together consistent arguments that might resonate.

Soon after Biden’s announcement, anchor Harris Faulkner offered the ludicrous argument that his decision not to seek reelection constituted a “threat” to “democracy.”

That evening, Fox’s Jesse Watters hosted Trump, his vice presidential nominee Sen. J.D. Vance, and independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to complain about Biden dropping out, while prime-time host Sean Hannity took shots at Harris’ laugh and, quite literally, grasped at straws.

On successive hours, Fox contributors brought on to discuss Harris attacked her as too tough on crime and too soft on crime.

Monday morning featured a montage of old clips of Biden saying he was running, as if to complain about how unfair the president had been to his opponent by ending his campaign.

All the while, MAGA influencers were plastering X with unhinged conspiracy theories about Biden’s decision to step down from his race and absurdly characterizing Harris’ candidacy as a “coup.”

Harris would be the first woman president and is the biracial daughter of Indian and Jamaican immigrants, and the right is infested with weird little freaks whose incentives favor being the worst possible versions of themselves, so the resulting discourse has featured a hefty helping of racism and sexism. They’ve branded her as a “DEI hire” who is “a little bit uppity”; pushed the racist conspiracy theory that she is not eligible for the presidency due to her parentage; focused attention on her decades-old dating history; and suggested it is disqualifying that she has “No children.” (“And no, becoming a step-parent to older teenagers doesn’t count.”)

Meanwhile, the GOP organ that generates decontextualized fodder for right-wing media is reupping video of Harris describing her outfit while introducing herself at an event whose attendees included blind people, while Republicans are claiming in rapid succession that they’ll sue to keep Biden on the ballot and that he should immediately step down from the presidency.

The chaos demonstrates what Kat Abughazaleh described in a Mother Jones video earlier this month as Fox’s “Kamala problem”: The right-wing propaganda network has struggled “to villainize her properly” over the past several years as it previously did to Hillary Clinton before her 2016 run, leaving its hosts flat-footed.

It also points to a critical weakness in the composition of the right-wing ecosystem: With radio giant Rush Limbaugh and Fox founder Roger Ailes dead, and former Fox star Tucker Carlson banished from its airwaves, the propaganda apparatus is an orchestra without a conductor who can lead its disparate parts to the same consistent message.

Instead, the closest thing the right has to a conductor is Trump. But his lack of discipline and unhinged nature make him unsuited for the role: He’s spent the last day melting down on Truth Social, arguing that Biden is faking COVID-19, that he may back out of a presidential debate against Harris, that Republicans should somehow be “reimbursed for fraud” for any money spent against Biden, that Biden may “wake up and forget that he dropped out of the race,” and that his decision to drop out makes Democrats “the real THREAT TO DEMOCRACY.”

Right-wing propagandists are part of a mammoth and well-funded industry, and I expect them to figure out something more coherent eventually. But there’s not that much time before the election, and they seem short on ideas thus far.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters.

GOP Delegates Complain About Trump's 'Dishonest' Platform Process

GOP Delegates Complain About Trump's 'Dishonest' Platform Process

Two years ago, some right-wing media figures — most notably, author Ann Coulter — viewed Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis as the future of the Republican Party and claimed that Donald Trump's influence had seriously declined. But in fact, Trump's stranglehold on the GOP grew even stronger.

Trump increased his influence not only on the Republican National Committee (RNC), but also, on the official 2024 GOP platform.

In a New York Times article published on July 18, reporters Jonathan Swan, Shane Goldmacher and Maggie Haberman detail Trump's campaign to dictate that platform.

"It was the ruthless efficiency of a process months in the making that squelched, silenced or steamrolled any forces who might oppose Mr. Trump," the reporters explain. "The result was the latest evidence of the political maturation of Mr. Trump and his operation."

Trump, according to Swan, Goldmacher and Haberman, was a total micromanager during the process of crafting the platform and "made clear to his team that he wanted the 2024 platform to be his and his alone."

Longtime Republican Gayle Ruzicka, who has served on several platform committees, is critical of the way the process was handled this time.

The Times journalists report that Ruzicka "said the participants had been told" one evening "that there would be subcommittee meetings" — but "instead, she said, delegates were handed what they were told was a draft on Monday."

Ruzicka, they add, "said that after roughly two hours and no amendments considered, the draft was ratified in full."

Ruzicka told the Times, "It was not honest, and that was what bothered me."

Tabitha Walter, executive director of Eagle Forum — the anti-feminist Religious Right group founded by the late Phyllis Schlafly in 1972 — is also highly critical of the way the platform was handled. And she said one woman in particular hounded her.

"Anywhere I would go get coffee and go to the bathroom, she would follow me around," Walter told the Times. "Any time I would take notes, she would read them."

Walter complained that the platform process "felt very hostile" and even compared it to "strong-arming."

According to Swan, Goldmacher and Haberman, Arizona State Rep. Alex Kolodin (one of the Republican delegates) "brought a laptop and printer" during a platform meeting — before "there was a quick vote to confiscate those and any other electronics."

"Mr. Kolodin said he had submitted ideas to the Trump team before the platform committee meeting but did not realize those gathered would have no actual say in the final document," the Times journalists report.

Kolodin told the Times, "This is all for show…. We all would have felt more respected by that upfront approach."

At that meeting, according to Swan, Goldmacher and Haberman, attendees "handed over their phones to party officials, who sealed them in the magnetic pouches."

"Mr. Trump and party operatives were allowed to keep their devices," the Times reporters note. "Only delegates and guests were denied the ability to communicate with the outside world."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Paul Dans

On Video, Project 2025 Director Says Trump Is 'Very Bought In With This'

Paul Dans, a former Trump administration official and the director of Project 2025, told a right-wing podcast last year that his group has a “great” relationship with former President Donald Trump, and “Trump's very bought in with this.” His comments fly in the face of Trump’s recent attempts to distance himself from Project 2025.

Project 2025, which is organized by right-wing think tank The Heritage Foundation, states that “Dans directs Heritage’s 2025 Presidential Transition Project, organizing policy and personnel recommendations and training for appointees in the next presidential administration. Prior to joining Heritage, Dans served in the Trump Administration as Chief of Staff at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.”

Media Matters has heavily documented the extreme nature of Project 2025. Notably, Heritage Foundation president and key Project 2025 figure Kevin Roberts recently sparked heavy criticism when he said, “We are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be.”

Following the controversy, Trump attempted to distance himself from the Heritage plan and has repeatedly claimed, “I know nothing about Project 2025.” But media outlets including Media Matters have documented the numerous connections between the project and the presumptive Republican presidential nominee.

Dans himself appears to have contradicted Trump’s claim that he knows nothing about the project. During a podcast interview that aired on May 20, 2023, the Project 2025 director assured a pro-Trump host that “we've had great relationships” with Trump and other Republicans, adding that “ultimately, yes. I think, you know, President Trump's very bought in with this.”

TOM ZAWISTOWSKI (HOST): I'm taking heart of the fact that Paul, you and Spencer [Chretien, associate director of Project 2025], you know, obviously worked for President Trump. So is it alright for us to, you know, to assume that President Trump, you know, is committed to the Project 2025 so that if we go through the effort of recruiting all these people and vetting them and training them, that he will, you know, say, “OK, when I'm elected, you know, these are my people”? And have you reached out to DeSantis and Vivek and, you know, whoever else is out there so that they're buying into this as well because, obviously, that's critical?

PAUL DANS (PROJECT 2025 DIRECTOR): Absolutely. Though our project is what we call candidate-neutral or candidate-agnostic. It's there to serve the next conservative standard bearer, whoever that might be. Very important though in that is making sure the various candidates are aware of what we're doing, are bought in.

And, of course, we've had great relationships with all three of those that you mentioned and other campaigns as well. You know, I think, overall, like you explained, the left does this full-time, all the time. Conservatives though have let this, they've waited on this to happen of May of the election year. Typically, the campaign itself starts a little transition team. And as they're at the same time trying to win the office of the president, they have another group trying to come up with the plan. What we've done here is rethought the whole operation with Heritage, you know, kind of being more of a neutral with respect to candidates, but rounding up the entire conservative movement and saying we're going to do all this vetting, all this identification of people, the training of them. We're going to draft a lot of these executive orders that take, you know, months and months of time and basically allow you — you know, offer these to you when you get there.

So ultimately, yes. I think, you know, President Trump's very bought in with this. We're fortunate to have John McEntee, who many of your listeners may know was, he was, helmed the Office of Presidential Personnel in what I would call the fourth quarter of the first term of Trump. But he is one of our senior advisers. We have other senior advisers who were very close to the governor and, you know, all the other teams, Vivek.

During an appearance last month on Steve Bannon's War Room program, Dans said that Project 2025 is the “instruction manual” for a second Trump administration. He has also told the Australian Financial Review he thinks Trump “will adopt” many of the project's ideas. He has additionally defended the fake electors scheme.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters.

Christine Todd Whitman

Former GOP Governor Compares Trump's Project 2025 To 'Nazi Manifesto'

In an interview earlier this week with the right-wing Real America's Voice network, Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts praised the Supreme Court's Monday immunity ruling in favor of Donald Trump, and appeared to threaten violence against Democrats should the former president lose his reelection bid in November.

"In spite of all this nonsense from the left, we are going to win," Roberts said. "We're in the process of taking this country back. We are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless, if the left allows it to be."

Earlier this year, legal analyst and New York University professor Ruth Ben-Ghiat told MSNBC's Ali Velshi that the far-right organization's Project 2025 "would effectively transform American government from a meritocratic democracy to a regime resembling Vladimir Putin's Russia."

Months later, a former Republican leader is warning that the GOP's plan also resembles former Nazi Party Adolf Hitler's manifesto, Mein Kampf.

Speaking with MSNBC's Katie Phang on Wednesday, former New Jersey Governor Christine Todd Whitman (R) said, "If you look at Project 2025, and compare it to the Nazis' manifesto, it's very, very scary. There's so many parallels there of what can be done, of what they're promising in 2025 to do. Do away with the justice system, basically. Get rid of all public servants, do away with actually every department and agency that provides any kind of stability for this country. It's really frightening. The people who say 'Oh, well, he'll never do that.' Why would you say that? If you believe he's gonna cut taxes, and you believe he's gonna do away with regulation, why don't you believe the rest of it? You can't have it both ways. Our democracy is teetering the brink right now."

In December, while speaking to an Iowa rally crowd, Trump denied that he'd ever read the manifesto.

ABC News reported, "Trump's denial that he had read Hitler's memoir came after he has made a series of incendiary remarks in recent weeks referring to his political opponents as 'vermin' and saying illegal immigrants are 'poisoning the blood of our country.'"

Watch the video below or at this link.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World