Tag: trump white house
Even More Troubling Than Weird Natalie? Vicious White House Attacks On Women

Even More Troubling Than Weird Natalie? Vicious White House Attacks On Women

She is the human printer, controlling the flow of paper to the president and transcribing his social media posts. She thinks she owes her life to Donald Trump. She is always by his side. Her name is Natalie Harp. She is this week's troubling news.

On Sunday, Georgia Sen. Jon Ossoff, a rising Democratic star, hit Trump hard: The Georgia senator told a crowd that Trump "doesn't want to do the job" and instead "wants to build his ballroom and travel with Natalie on their apparently defenseless flying palace gifted by the emir of Qatar."

What's newsworthy about that? It was news to most of us that of the very few aides whose lives Trump valued most — the ones who switched planes with him, sending Air Force One as the decoy — was Natalie Harp. Not the Secretary of State or the Secretary of the Treasury. Natalie Harp.

Kristen Holmes, a senior White House correspondent at CNN and a well-respected journalist, asked Trump to respond to Ossoff's comment. Trump went off the deep end and the White House response team did the rest.

When Holmes asked Trump in the Oval Office to respond to Ossoff's remark, the president dismissed her, calling the senator a "Pee-wee Herman lookalike".

"Quiet, quiet, quiet. You're very disrespectful." After she told him she worked for CNN, he responded, "Fake news, you're fake news, you're a loud, boisterous person. You're fake news. Be quiet. Be quiet. You're a fake reporter and you report fake news."

The White House's "rapid response" social media account then took over, posting the exchange and calling her a "disgraceful, humiliating embarrassment to her alleged profession".

The post criticized her for taking a "cheap shot" at a staffer, adding: "These scumbags are the lowest of the low."

Then they called her a bad mother, sending out yet another post attacking the CNN reporter: "Someday, your children will come across your disgusting and inhumane question. They will be sickened and embarrassed to have a parent be so callous and vindictive. It's quite troubling."

Natalie Harp was diagnosed with Stage 2 bone cancer in the early 2010s. She credits a bill signed by Donald Trump with giving her access to experimental treatment.

"We all know the story about the Good Samaritan. But what you don't know is I was that forgotten person on the side of the road ... and left to die of cancer," Harp reportedly said at an event with the president in 2019. "But then, an outsider — my Good Samaritan, President Donald J. Trump — he saw me there and he didn't walk by. He stopped."

Not exactly. According to the experts, as reported in The Washington Post, the drug Harp credited Trump with helping her gain access to was already approved by the Food and Drug Administration at the time she received it. Experts said she would have been able to access it without "Right to Try," which is a pathway to access medication not yet approved by the FDA.

Harp's story got Trump's attention and a speaking role at the 2020 Convention. She has been by his side ever since.

Harp's loyalty to Trump and his to her is noteworthy. But what is more noteworthy is Trump's attitude to the press and women reporters in particular. "Quiet, piggy," he told a Bloomberg reporter; and another CNN journalist he called "corrupt" and stormed out of NBC's Meet the Press after calling the moderator "crooked or stupid." Meanwhile, ABC has taken the FCC to court for threatening its license renewals because the President doesn't like the coverage.

Natalie Harp is not really the issue. The First Amendment is.

Susan Estrich is a celebrated feminist legal scholar, the first female president of the Harvard Law Review, and the first woman to run a U.S. presidential campaign. She has written eight books.

Is The Trump Administration Using Media Leaks To Manipulate Oil Markets?

Is The Trump Administration Using Media Leaks To Manipulate Oil Markets?

The Trump administration on Wednesday appears to have leaked a story to its favorite Iran war stenographer at Axios that the military has created a secret shipping corridor out of the Strait of Hormuz, helping to escort 15 to 20 oil tankers through the narrow passageway per day.

Axios’ Barak Ravid reported: “The U.S.-led operation is mitigating one of the most painful aspects of the war: the disruption to oil supplies that sent crude prices soaring. While the amount of oil coming out of the strait is still below pre-war levels, it is making a discernible difference in global supplies, officials say.”

U.S. officials claimed to Axios that the operation was allowing the movement of “[a]bout 10 million barrels of oil a day.”

Commodity experts, however, are more than skeptical that this secretive operation has taken place, and wonder if this—like apparent past attempts by the Trump administration—is just an effort to manipulate oil prices to try to bring down the cost of gasoline.

“That’s a lot of oil, and much more than we’re currently seeing,” oil commodity expert Rory Johnson wrote in a post on X on Wednesday, adding that oil trackers have only seen 5 million barrels of oil leaving the strait per day, half of what the government claimed to Axios.

“We’re likely undercounting actual transits, but it feels like a stretch that they’re managing to get *double* that volume out entirely undetected—no sign of loadings, or where these ships may be landing on the other end,” he continued.

Tanker Trackers, a maritime intelligence firm that analyzes the amount of oil being shipped globally, also cast doubt on the Axios report.

“Maybe U.S. officials mean ten million barrels per convoy transfer and not per day. Industry consensus is much lower than that,” the company wrote in a post on X, giving the Trump administration the benefit of the doubt that they do not deserve.

If the Trump administration were using Axios to manipulate the oil markets, it wouldn’t be the first time.

Early on in the war, Ravid frequently reported right before oil futures markets opened that a peace deal was imminent, which would lead oil commodity prices to fall. However, they’d typically spike right back up when it became clear that there was no peace deal to be had.

Nearly six months later, there is still no resolution to the war, with Iranian leaders continuing to use the Strait of Hormuz to inflict pain on the global economy in the hopes they can get Trump to fold on his demands that they drop their nuclear ambitions.

Indeed, as the persistently high price of fuel is spiking inflation, Trump’s approval rating has fallen and is threatening his Republican Party with massive midterm losses.

Even Trump is showing public signs of frustration, threatening to “bomb the shit out of” countries that cross him.

What’s different about Axios’ report now is that it seems traders have wised up to the apparent manipulation efforts.

Oil prices rose again on Thursday. The average price per gallon of gasoline in the U.S. is now at $4.10, according to AAA—up nearly $1 per gallon from a year ago.

Johnson, the oil commodity expert, revisited Axios’ story again on Thursday morning, saying he is even more convinced now that the report isn’t accurate.

“What’s fascinating is just how aligned ~every ship tracker is right now on Hormuz exit flow,” Johnson wrote in a post on X. “There’s a *strong* incentive for someone to break from the pack and to be the tracker who confirms the WH numbers. And yet.”

And yet, indeed.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos




Dr. Jonathan Reiner

White House Enraged After Top Cardiologist Raises Concerns About Trump's Condition

A high-profile heart doctor is raising concerns about the White House’s failure to fully disclose President Donald Trump’s health issues, and Trump’s team is lashing out in response instead of leveling with the public.

Dr. Jonathan Reiner made his case in an op-ed published in the New York Times on Thursday. Reiner is a professor of medicine and surgery at George Washington University and served as former Vice President Dick Cheney’s cardiologist for 27 years, including from 2001-2009 when he was in office.Together, he and Cheney authored the book “Heart: An American Medical Odyssey,” chronicling the former veep’s battle with heart disease.

In his column, Reiner noted that Trump has several ailments that are “easy to see” and do not comport with the effusive writeups on Trump’s physical state released by the current White House physician.

“Despite reassurances from the White House to the contrary, at times over the past year, the president has not looked well,” Reiner wrote.

“Mr. Trump is probably the most photographed president in American history, and a variety of physical ailments are easy to see. He’s had large bruises on both hands, swelling in his legs and episodes when it appears that he is struggling to stay awake,” the doctor said. “He’s also had advanced imaging performed for unclear reasons. The public is again left to wonder whether the nation’s leader is OK.”

In May Dr. Sean Barbabella, the physician to the president, claimed in a report that Trump “remains in excellent health.” But Reiner said that the information released about Trump raises more questions than answers.

He notes that Trump’s medical report said he spoke to more than 22 physicians but doesn’t say why he is seeing so many medical professionals. Reiner said the report doesn’t explain Trump’s skin discoloration, why his ankles continue to swell, his inability to stay awake, or why he has taken so many cognitive tests.

In examining the cone of silence around Trump’s health, Reiner notes that Buckingham Palace keeps a similarly tight lid on King Charles’ medical issues but concludes, “The United States does not have a king. In a representative democracy, the people must have confidence in the health of their leader, and in the leader’s capacity to guide the nation.”

Reiner isn’t alone. For years now Trump’s appearance has led to viral videos and photographs of his condition, particularly in the context of his constant attacks on the health of Democrats like former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Joe Biden. Even photographs of Trump’s hair looking unnaturally thick after previous photos showed signs of thinning renewed questions about his health and apparent efforts to cover up the truth.

It doesn’t help that Trump himself has posted AI-enhanced photos of himself to hide blemishes and obvious signs of aging.

As is often the case, the White House lashed out instead of taking Reiner’s questions seriously.

“Jonathan Reiner is an asshat engaging in armchair diagnosis for political purposes. He is a disgrace to the medical profession,” administration spokesperson Davis Ingle said in a statement.

Appearing on CNN, Reiner noted that the Trump White House gave the so-called “asshat” a certificate hailing the work of his medical unit within the past year. The doctor reiterated to the network that the angry response underlines “a picture of a president who has active medical issues who doesn’t appear well in public.”

If Trump is healthy and fine, there would be no need to bash doctors or hide the details of his medical status from the Americans he works for. Instead, the Trump administration continues the cover-up.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

Karoline Leavitt and baby

Left To Perish On Trump's Death Plane, Leavitt Gives Notice As Press Secretary

The political news cycle becomes glacial and petty in August, and I am here for it.

Why? Because, with the exception of this week’s primaries (farewell for now, Francesca Hong!), which continue to fuel pointless debates about what the Democratic Party should be and to whom, there is not even a gridlocked Congress to write about. Congress has gone home on its annual five-week August recess, mandated by federal law in 1970 because, according to one source, “there were many younger lawmakers with children coming into Congress who wanted a more predictable legislative schedule and designated vacation times.” Everyone will be back by mid-September—well, maybe not Mitch McConnell, but everyone else.

But it’s always big news when the President’s press secretary leaves, right? In the Department of “You Can’t Have It All, Even If God Loves You,” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt is leaving her job lying to, and terrorizing, the White House press corps. Is this a surprise?

Yes and no.

Admittedly, the timing is weird: Leavitt had just returned from maternity leave, and you would think that after spending nine weeks as a mother of two she would have not done that unless she thought she had the support at home to hack it. And I am quite sure that Trump leaving her on the decoy plane in Ankara to be shot down by Iranian missiles did not put the thought in her head. Or it may have been the final straw. After everything she had done for him, Trump left Leavitt behind to die but let Natalie Harp live.

At 26, Leavitt was the youngest PressSec in history, and if anyone had the stamina to simultaneously mother two children under two and Donald Trump, it was her. In 2024, she returned to her job with the Trump campaign one week after giving birth to her son in July, and this time she took six weeks off. Clearly this was a sign she was slowing down, but we can all agree that even with paid help, caring for two children under 25-months, one of whom is an infant, is hard to do well when you have a globe-trotting, seven day a week 16-hour a day job—and your boss calls you incessantly.

Citing a report in the Daily Mail, Edith Olmsted at The New Republic writes that Leavitt has been trying to get out for some time:

Two sources told the Mail that Leavitt’s decision, announced Wednesday, had been months in the making. “She was just trying to figure out how to politely step down with [Trump’s] blessing,” one of the sources said.
Another source told the Mail that Leavitt realized she needed to leave after returning from maternity leave. “First week back she realized she wasn’t feeling it anymore,” the source said.
Yet another source told Mail that Leavitt had been experiencing severe “burnout” from her job.

Arguably, that baby was Leavitt’s ticket out. Maybe that was Usha Vance’s strategy too: The more you can make an argument for staying home, the less implicated in fascism and corruption you are.Who’s waiting in the wings to take Leavitt’s place?

Rumor has it that CNN’s conservative commentator Scott Jennings is a top candidate. Martin Holmes of TV Insider cites a New York Post story that also puts these folks in the mix: Alina Habba, a former Trump attorney who now has a weird job called “Senior Advisor to the Attorney General for U.S. Attorneys;” deputy press secretary Anna Kelly, who is actually qualified for the job and so, probably won’t get it; Taylor Budowich, who used to work for Ohio Republican Congressman Max Miller, currently in the news for alleged family violence; and Breitbart Washington bureau chief Matthew Boyle, who is probably also qualified, but physically unattractive, usually a no-go zone for Trump. Katie Miller, Kari Lake, and Steven Cheung have also been mentioned.

Of all of these, Anna Kelly would be the right pick; Kari Lake would be hilarious; and Alina Habba will probably get it.

It will also be interesting to see Leavitt’s next move, and how quickly she makes it. She clearly loves to work, and the jury is out about whether she loves being a full time mother. Leavitt is not even 30 yet, and she has played her cards well, up to and including marrying a rich older man who can support her ambitions as a working mother with plenty of staff. My guess is that after a decent interval, she will pivot to becoming either a highly paid right-wing pundit at Fox News or David Ellison’s new look CNN.

Claire Potter is a political historian who taught at the New School for Social Research. She is a contributing editor to Public Seminar and wrote the popular blog Tenured Radical from 2006 through 2015. Please consider subscribing to Political Junkie, her Substack newsletter.

Reprinted with permission from Political Junkie.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World