Tag: white supremacists
True Patriots Still Face Our Nation's History With Eyes And Ears Open

True Patriots Still Face Our Nation's History With Eyes And Ears Open

The image went viral, and you can see why: a lone Black woman, sitting on a Washington, D.C., Metro train, surrounded by members of Patriot Front. She is the only one showing her face, wearing an expression both calm and wary. You don’t exactly know what the rest are thinking, since their bodies are covered with masks and a uniform of khaki and navy blue on a broiling summer day.

That’s par for the course for flash mob-type gatherings organized by the group the Anti-Defamation League describes as white supremacist. Though, after viewing a video of confused members navigating the D.C. Metro system, with leader Thomas Rousseau shouting instructions no one seems to understand, “supreme” is not the word that comes to mind.

On a day celebrating the country’s 250th birthday, it was an arresting scene, and just one during a weekend that bore the mark of one man. But it was a scene that stuck, more than fireworks barely visible (on TV anyway) through a haze of polluted smoke or sparse crowds at a poor facsimile of a state fair.

Maybe that’s because the Department of Justice under the direction of President Donald Trump has prioritized pardoning and erasing the crimes of members of such groups, so their bold presence made perfect sense.

Their goal was not to celebrate America as it is, but to “reclaim” a vision of a country that never was, a sentiment Patriot Front marchers screamed. Some carried the Confederate flag of traitors — losers when they attempted division in a bloody Civil War — perhaps presaging the modern-day group’s own fate if America’s history of hard-fought triumph over dark forces is any blueprint for the future.

They might have learned a thing or two about how that war turned out and much more from a visit to the museums on the National Mall — America’s true treasures, and they’re free. But I’m pretty sure knowledge was not on the agenda.

Another group of Trump supporters did not have any choice.

In what can only be described as an act of God, thunderstorms forced thousands of attendees at the Freedom 250 celebration to take refuge in the National Museum of African American History and Culture.

It was a situation impossible to ignore and too far-fetched for a fiction writer to imagine.

That museum, which Trump praised as “great” in his first term, has since come under attack from the current administration. Praise to condemnation — that’s very on-brand for a president who, in his second term, has escalated to lashing out at everything from perceived enemies to facts he doesn’t like.

Last year, in an executive order, “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,” the museum was listed as one of the offenders in the Smithsonian’s “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history.”

That “our” is doing a lot of work in that particular charge, as it ignores an awful lot of “us,” patriotic Americans who celebrate the ideals of a country that has sometimes struggled to live up to them.

Not telling the whole story flattens American history and robs it of its richness.

There is “so much winning” exalted within those walls — to use one of Trump’s favorite phrases — stories of resilience, of human beings coming together. That should make any viewer proud.

As someone who has toured the museum more than once, I lamented images of many of the Freedom 250 refugees looking at their phones instead of the wonders of the space, even if they could venture no farther than the lobby.

The building itself is a work of art, wrapped in an ornamental bronze-colored metal lattice, through which the architect pays homage to “the intricate ironwork crafted by enslaved African Americans in Louisiana, South Carolina, and elsewhere,” as the museum explains.

“This building will sing for all of us,” in the words of Lonnie Bunch, the museum’s founding director and current secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, the first African American and first historian to serve in that role.

Lately, Bunch has been busy making the Smithsonian’s mission crystal clear. That’s after the White House released a 162-page report singling out the Smithsonian National Museum of American History. It states that the museum “no longer treats the American story as a shared national inheritance to be taught or celebrated, but as a political instrument to divide, dispirit, and discourage our citizens.”

Did any of the report’s authors bother to explore the museum’s “In Pursuit of Life, Liberty and Happiness” exhibit, timed to celebrate the Declaration of Independence and the nation’s 250th anniversary?

That’s Thomas Jefferson’s desk on display at the Smithsonian Castle!

“Our work is driven by scholarship, accuracy, and an uncompromising commitment to tell the fullness of America’s story,” Bunch wrote to his staff in a memo obtained by news outlets. The secretary had to lead the defense, since it doesn’t seem to be a priority for members of Congress.

But what’s more important than learning about America’s commitment to democracy in an election year?

Perhaps no one said it better than Roswell Encina, who also shared an uncomfortable Metro ride with the Patriot Front contingent as he made his way to a July Fourth party. In Salon, Encina shared the background that made his experience especially poignant.

As someone whose father served in the U.S. Navy, whose family moved between the United States and the Philippines, who became a citizen and remembers his first presidential vote, Encina is proud of his work as president and CEO of the U.S. Capitol Historical Society, “where our mission is to preserve history, elevate civics and help Americans better understand Congress and the Capitol.”

What a valuable resource for the masked men surrounding him, who, like many of those who entered the walls of the Smithsonian out of necessity rather than curiosity, ignored the glorious truth staring them in the face.

Encina’s definition of patriotism? It’s “not about deciding who belongs. It is not about intimidation or fear. Patriotism is about widening the circle of liberty, dignity and opportunity so that more people can fully participate in the promise of this country.”

Reclaim that.

Mary C. Curtis has worked at The New York Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Charlotte Observer, as national correspondent for Politics Daily, and is a senior facilitator with The OpEd Project. She is host of the CQ Roll Call “Equal Time with Mary C. Curtis” podcast. Follow her on X @mcurtisnc3.

Reprinted with permission from Roll Call

Justice Department Indicts White Supremacist Gang Leaders On Terror Charges

Justice Department Indicts White Supremacist Gang Leaders On Terror Charges

Dallas Erin Humber and Matthew Allison, the leaders of the white supremacist terrorist group Terrorgram Collective are facing up to 220 years in prison on charges of soliciting hate crimes, conspiring to provide material support to terrorists and soliciting the murder of federal officials.

The Justice Department announced Monday that Humber, 34, and Allison, 37, were arrested Friday. The pair were indicted on 15 charges. The charges include one count of conspiracy, four counts of soliciting hate crimes, three more of soliciting the murder of federal officials, three counts of doxxing federal officials, two counts of distributing information on making bombs, one count of conspiring to provide material support to terrorists and a count of making threatening communications.

“Today’s indictment charges the defendants with leading a transnational terrorist group dedicated to attacking America’s critical infrastructure, targeting a hit list of our country’s public officials, and carrying out deadly hate crimes—all in the name of violent white supremacist ideology,” Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a statement. “Today’s arrests are a warning that committing hate-fueled crimes in the darkest corners of the internet will not hide you, and soliciting terrorist attacks from behind a screen will not protect you.”

The Terrorgram Collective is based around the messaging app Telegram, and promotes the idea of white supremacist accelerationism, the Justice Department said. Accelerationism is an ideology that uses terrorism and political violence in hopes of speeding up a collapse of the government, which can then be replaced with a new system. In Terrorgram’s case, that new system would be a white ethnostate. In order to cause this destruction, Humber and Allison allegedly provided advice for committing crimes and disseminated a list of “high-value targets” of government officials and business leaders to be assassinated.

The Justice Department says it has linked Terrorgram with a shooting outside of an LGBTQ bar in Slovakia, a mass stabbing in Turkey near a mosque and a person who planned to attack New Jersey’s power grid. Terrorgram called those who had made attacks “Saints,” and the indictment includes a graphic explaining a five point criteria for “sainthood.” First is to “be White… obviously”; the incident must be deliberate; the motive must align with the white supremacist cause; there must be a body count, or “score,” of one or more; and the attacker must share a similar worldview to the group. Another graphic depicted the “Path to Sainthood”: Starting at “Grievance,” moving to “Violent Ideation,” to “Research and Planning”, to “Preparation,” to “Probing and breaching”, ending in “Attack.”

“Hate crimes fueled by bigotry and white supremacy, and amplified by the weaponization of digital messaging platforms, are on the rise and have no place in our society,” said Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “Make no mistake, as hate groups turn to online platforms, the federal government is adapting and responding to protect vulnerable communities.”

The case will be heard in federal court, in the Eastern District of California.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Texas Mall Shooter Wore Neo-Nazi Regalia And Shared Racist Content Online

Texas Mall Shooter Wore Neo-Nazi Regalia And Shared Racist Content Online

The man who murdered eight people using an AR-15 at an outlet mall in Allen, Texas, Saturday likely identified with neo-Nazi beliefs, The Washington Post reports.

Allen resident Mauricio Garcio, according to the Post wore a "patch on his chest" at the time of the shooting that read "RWDS," meaning "Right Wing Death Squad," a "phrase popular among right wing extremists, neo-Nazis and white supremacists."

Additionally, NBC reports Garcia "interacted with neo-Nazi and white supremacist content online."

Last year, an Anti-Defamation League's Center (ADLC) on Extremism report revealed "all extremist-related murders in 2022 were committed by right-wing extremists," adding, "More than four out of five extremist-related murders last year were committed by white supremacist right-wing extremists."

The report also noted "nearly all extremist-related mass killings were committed by right-wing extremists, and warns the number of those mass murders 'is of growing concern.'"

An official familiar with the matter told NBC not only did Garcia engage with neo-Nazi content online, but he also posted such content himself.

Regarding the issue of gun violence specifically pertaining to Texas, the Post reports:

In 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recorded 4,613 firearms-related deaths in Texas. The state's annual death toll from guns has increased steadily since 2014.

Led by Abbott, Texas has moved in recent years to loosen restrictions on firearms. In 2021, the state began allowing permitless carry so residents can carry handguns in public without a license. The state 'does not specifically put restrictions on who can carry a long gun such as a rifle or shotgun,' according to a Texas government website.

ADLC's report added the "main threat in the near future will likely be white supremacist shooters," noting, "The increase in the number of mass killing attempts, meanwhile, is one of the most alarming trends in recent years."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet


Organizers protest Robert E. Lee statue in Charlottesville, VA in 2017.

Statues Come Down While Barriers To Truth Are Erected

Reprinted with permission from Roll Call

In Charlottesville, Va., where a Unite the Right gathering of neo-Nazis, white supremacists, Lost Cause devotees and other angry history deniers left destruction and death in their path in 2017, there was a different scene this past weekend.

The city removed statues of Confederate generals Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson, memorials to those who fought on the losing side of a Civil War to maintain the brutal and murderous institution of slavery. They were erected as monuments to white supremacy, not in the 1860s but the 1920s, a Jim Crow threat to Black citizens to "know their place."

Now, as then, there are those opposed to this bit of progress, with arguments that removing the stone idols would mean erasing history, which is ridiculous since that history will never disappear from books, museums and tall tales handed down by the "never forget" brigade.

Ironically, many of these same folks would be only too glad to forget what really happened, during that bloody Civil War and in the 100 years after — the ingenious laws and policies that continue to reverberate through everything from health care to housing.

As part of the plan, they've come up with a fear-based campaign to, you got it, erase any part of American history that deals with racism and the ways it was intentionally embedded in American institutions. And predictably, this battle in a war that has never ended is actually gaining momentum that Republican politicians hope to ride to electoral victory.

The Ultimate Snowflakes

They could not do it without the cooperation of aggrieved parents fighting against something they haven't even tried to understand.

I really wish that instead of tying themselves into contradictory knots, these troops standing in the way of the truth — the ultimate snowflakes trying to "cancel" facts — would come clean and just admit that it's not history they're opposed to, it's any reckoning that gets in the way of their myths.

The version of history they love is what's been spoon-fed to many generations until fairly recently — propaganda in the name of patriotism. The concern "for the children" expressed in tear-stained testimony at school board meetings from Loudoun County, Va., to Chandler, Ariz., only extends to certain kids, their own. It leaves out the Black, brown, Asian American and Native American children who have suffered through and been traumatized by a white-washed tableau that either villainizes or disappears American heroes who always have been stalwart fighters for an inclusive and welcoming society, also known as America as it supposedly aspires to be.

There is no more absurd example than in Tennessee, where parents from "Moms for Liberty" don't want children to learn about what six-year-old Ruby Bridges endured when she integrated her New Orleans elementary school in 1960. The image of young Ruby immortalized by quintessential American artist Norman Rockwell depicts her daily walk surrounded by federal marshals. To get an education, her body and soul had to survive angry white parents, faces twisted, who greeted her with jeers, who threatened to poison her, who, when a child her age should have been playing with baby dolls, held up a coffin carrying a Black one so Ruby could get the message.

So, white children of today are too fragile to merely read about the dangerous racism a 6-year-old faced not that long ago? Do their parents realize they are still trying to bar Ruby Bridges from school?

A complaint is that Ruby's story needs more whites in shining armor.

Well, there were a few, including Barbara Henry, a white teacher from Massachusetts, who did the job she was paid to do for the year Ruby was in a class all her own. And there are the parents who eventually sent their children back to get an education, in more ways than one.

The star of her story, though, is Ruby, someone any child should admire. She never cried or whimpered, said federal marshal Charles Burks. "She just marched along like a little soldier." A former first lady, Eleanor Roosevelt, wrote her a letter.

An argument brought up again and again in these curriculum fights is that teaching stories like Ruby's causes children of color to think of themselves as victims. The opposite is true. Ruby, at 66, is still an activist, as well as a wife and mother. Ruby Bridges Goes to School: My True Story, her book that parents are so afraid of, teaches lessons of resilience and strength that transcend color. The message she continues to share: "I tell children to be kind to each other."

Oh, the horror!

Beyond The Classroom

Children wrongly taught that America was and has always been perfect, presumably grow into the fragile flowers that Sen. Tom Cotton believes need protecting when they enter the military. In the manner of the thought police in Russia or China, the Arkansas Republican is trying to get an instructor at the U.S. Air Force Academy fired for teaching about systemic racism that shaped all-American institutions, like the military.

Does Cotton not know that African Americans fought for the right to fight and die for a country that enslaved them, discriminated against them, segregated them into separate units until 1948?

Was Cotton not taught of the Japanese Americans who fought in World War II — including in one of the most decorated regiments in the country's history — while family members back home were herded into internment camps, suspect only because of their race and ethnicity?

That made their sacrifice more patriotic, with their numbers in service still strong. Though they lack representation at the top, about 43 percent of the 1.3 million men and women on active duty in the United States military are people of color.

People of color in America know, have always known about, injustice, just as six-year-old Ruby learned. Being clear-eyed about how the country falls short of its ideals only hardens the determination to right those wrongs.

And, in truth, it's not just students of color whose lives continue to be affected by systemic racism. In a Texas school, a white teacher gave white students permission to use the "N-word." In California, a high school basketball team had its title taken away for throwing tortillas at members of the opposing, predominantly Latino team at a postgame "celebration."

All children, as well as adults who should know better, have learned only too well lessons about the country's power divide, about who counts and who does not.

When you hide history, a price will be paid. Esther Bejarano knew. The Auschwitz survivor, who used the power of music to fight anti-Semitism and racism in postwar Germany, died recently at the age of 96. She used to tell the young people: "You're not guilty of what happened back then. But you become guilty if you refuse to listen to what happened."

When I study the pictures of those everyday Americans spewing hate at a 6-year-old and then the faces of angry parents and politicians, so insistent on burying the truth, my wish is that they listen, then look in a mirror.

Mary C. Curtis has worked at The New York Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Charlotte Observer, as national correspondent for Politics Daily, and is a senior facilitator with The OpEd Project. Follow her on Twitter @mcurtisnc3.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World