The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

WASHINGTON (AFP) – Two veteran senators pushing immigration reform Thursday insisted their bill was still alive, despite growing doubts it has a chance in the Republican-led House of Representatives.

John McCain and Chuck Schumer’s optimism survived even though House Republicans signaled Wednesday they would ditch a comprehensive approach to fix the immigration system favored by the Senate and the White House.

“We have seen a large percentage of the House realizing that doing nothing is not an option,” Schumer said after he and McCain met President Barack Obama, for whom the reform bid is a legacy project. “Yesterday was an encouraging day on the path to immigration reform.”

Both Schumer, a Democrat, and McCain, a Republican, insisted a path to citizenship for 11 million undocumented immigrants was a crucial part of the reform, despite opposition among many House Republicans.

McCain stressed that the Senate respected the House’s prerogative to pass its own bill, which would then be merged with the version that has already passed the other chamber.

“The message to our colleagues in the House is we are ready to negotiate — we are ready to talk,” said McCain.

House Republican leaders, however, have warned that they will adopt a piecemeal approach to immigration reform, rather than the sweeping approach the Senate has taken to secure borders and deal with illegal immigrants.

There appears to be some support for efforts to tighten border security and to overhaul work visas among House Republicans, but a path to citizenship, branded by some conservatives as “amnesty” appears a step too far.

National Republican leaders recognize that scuppering immigration reform could be politically disastrous, given the issue’s importance to the increasingly powerful Hispanic voting bloc.

But many House Republicans, with few Hispanics in their districts, have little incentive to back a bill fiercely condemned as “amnesty” by many conservatives.

The White House, which stayed in the background for much of the Senate debate on immigration reform last month, is trying to crank up the pressure on House Republicans to force them to pass the bill.

Schumer told reporters that Obama, who made immigration reform a strong plank of his re-election effort last year had been playing it “perfectly” by encouraging reform behind the scenes.

McCain said the president was entitled to join the debate, but warned that the challenge was to win over skeptical House Republicans, — a task to which the Democratic president was not ideally suited.

“The president is walking a careful line here,” McCain added.


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Al Franken guest hosts on Jimmy Kimmel Live

Image via YouTube

Since his much-lamented resignation from the United States Senate, Al Franken has started his own podcast, made some TV and radio appearances, and is currently on tour across the country -- but his profile rose sharply this week when he guest-hosted Jimmy Kimmel Live.

Instead of dwelling on the good news of President Biden signing the Inflation Reduction Act, Franken's monologue drilled into another existential threat facing our nation. No, not the “enormous gaps in wealth and income” nor the “threats to our democracy,” but rather a peril that has troubled him since his Senate days.

Keep reading... Show less

Rudy Giuliani arrives at Fulton County courthouse in Atlanta, Georgia on August 17, 2022

(Reuters) - Rudy Giuliani, Donald Trump's onetime personal lawyer, arrived at an Atlanta courthouse on Wednesday to testify in a Georgia criminal probe examining attempts by the former U.S. president and his allies to overturn the 2020 election results.

Giuliani, who helped lead Trump's election challenges, was due to testify before a special grand jury in Fulton County after a judge ordered him to comply with a subpoena. His lawyers say he will refuse to answer questions that violate attorney-client privilege.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}