The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Donald Trump said Tuesday that he was not kidding when he said he wanted to slow down COVID-19 testing because too many tests were coming back positive.

"I don't kid, let me just tell you, let me make it clear," Trump said before leaving the White House on a trip to Arizona.

Trump made the original comments on Saturday during a campaign rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

"When you do testing to that extent, you're going to find more people, you're going to find more cases. So I said to my people, 'Slow the testing down, please,'" Trump told the half-empty arena.

That comment provoked a torrent of criticism, as early on in the COVID-19 pandemic coronavirus tests were hard to come by. Public health experts say the lack of testing possibly led to further spread of the virus, as experts were unable to trace the source of outbreaks to slow the spread.

In fact, experts say more testing is needed to prevent asymptomatic cases from further spreading the virus and causing more waves of outbreak as the country starts to open up again.

To diffuse the criticism, Trump aides claimed he was just "joking" when he made that remark.

Trade adviser Peter Navarro said Sunday that Trump was "obviously kidding," White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said the next day that Trump's comment was made "in jest."

But Trump undercut that defense on Tuesday, when CBS News' Weijia Jiang asked whether his aides were right in saying he was merely joking. It's a tactic his team has used numerous times in the past to try to excuse Trump's offensive comments.

By confirming that he was not joking about slowing down testing, Trump also showed he doesn't understand why testing is important, instead viewing the large number of positive cases through a political lens and how it looks bad for his administration.

"By having more cases, it sounds bad, but actually what it is, we're finding people, many of those people aren't symptoms, very little, they may be young people," Trump told Jiang.

Earlier Tuesday, Trump also sought to defend his desire to see less testing.

"Cases are going up in the U.S. because we are testing far more than any other country, and ever expanding. With smaller testing we would show fewer cases!" Trump tweeted.

That claim is also wrong.

Public health experts don't look at the raw number of positive tests, but rather the percentage of tests that come back positive. The higher the positive rate, the more concerning it is for public health officials.

States such as Arizona, which Trump is visiting Tuesday, are seeing a large positivity rate and a high number of intensive care unit beds occupied — a worrisome sign.

To date, more than 2.3 million people in the United States have been infected by the coronavirus, and 120,345 have died, according to the New York Times.

Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Supreme Court of the United States

YouTube Screenshot

A new analysis is explaining the disturbing circumstances surrounding the overturning of Roe v. Wade and how the U.S. Supreme Court has morphed into an entity actively working toward authoritarianism.

In a new op-ed published by The Guardian, Jill Filipovic —author of the book, The H-Spot: The Feminist Pursuit of Happiness—offered an assessment of the message being sent with the Supreme Court's rollback of the 1973 landmark ruling.

Keep reading... Show less


YouTube Screenshot

After a year of reporting on the tax machinations of the ultrawealthy, ProPublica spotlights the top tax-avoidance techniques that provide massive benefits to billionaires.

Last June, drawing on the largest trove of confidential American tax data that’s ever been obtained, ProPublica launched a series of stories documenting the key ways the ultrawealthy avoid taxes, strategies that are largely unavailable to most taxpayers. To mark the first anniversary of the launch, we decided to assemble a quick summary of the techniques — all of which can generate tax savings on a massive scale — revealed in the series.

1. The Ultra Wealth Effect

Our first story unraveled how billionaires like Elon Musk, Warren Buffett and Jeff Bezos were able to amass some of the largest fortunes in history while paying remarkably little tax relative to their immense wealth. They did it in part by avoiding selling off their vast holdings of stock. The U.S. system taxes income. Selling stock generates income, so they avoid income as the system defines it. Meanwhile, billionaires can tap into their wealth by borrowing against it. And borrowing isn’t taxable. (Buffett said he followed the law and preferred that his wealth go to charity; the others didn’t comment beyond a “?” from Musk.)

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}