{{ site.specific_data.Twitter }}
Pete Hegseth

FT Report Reveals Defense Investment By Hegseth, Who Slammed 'Insider Trading'

A new report from the Financial Times found that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s stockbroker “contacted BlackRock in February about making a multimillion-dollar investment in the asset manager’s Defense Industrials Active ETF … shortly before the US launched military action against Tehran.” Financial Times noted that the ETF's “largest holdings include defence conglomerates RTX, Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman, which count the US Department of Defense as their biggest customers.”

But in his former role as a Fox News host, Hegseth slammed federal officials for alleged instances of “insider trading.” In a 2022 interview with Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA), Hegseth touted a Wall Street Journal report highlighting “officials exposed … for trading stock in companies that their very own agencies regulate,” including one Department of Defense official who “bought a defense stock five times before it won new business from the Pentagon.”

Hegseth called out the actions as “insider trading,” criticizing the officials by saying, “They enrich themselves while they're supposed to be temporary public servants.”


PETE HEGSETH (CO-HOST): Thousands of government officials exposed in a new report for trading stock in companies that their very own agencies regulate. Our next guest is calling out the very clear and ongoing ethics violation and demanding House leadership take action. Pennsylvania Congressman Brian Fitzpatrick joins us now. Congressman, thanks so much for being here. Before we get into the topic real quick, here's a few more examples just to put some meat on the bone.

So more than 1,800 officials held major tech stocks while scrutinizing those companies. More than 60 officials traded company stock before their departments announced enforcement, so you might say they have some inside information. More than 200 senior EPA officials invested in companies that were lobbying that very same agency, 400 White House and State Department staff bought Chinese stocks while the U.S. considered blacklisting certain companies in that country. And not on the screen is the Defense Department. Officials collectively owned 1.2 million — 3.4 million of stock in aerospace defense companies. One particular official actually knew of a — bought a defense stock five times before it won new business from the Pentagon. Is this just everywhere, congressman?

REP. BRIAN FITZPATRICK (R-PA): Yeah, Pete. Good to see you this morning. Pete, there's a there's a huge gap in the law on the civil side, SEC rule 10 b 5, and on the criminal side, section 1348 of Title 18, which deal with, quote, unquote, company insiders. They deal with people that have a fiduciary responsibility to the company, but it doesn't deal with anybody that have an oversight role. And that would be government officials. That's members of Congress through their committee assignments who have access to information that is not available to the public. And also, as you just referenced, executive branch officials. You have EPA officials trading in oil stocks, you have FDA officials trading pharmaceuticals, you have DOD officials, as you just pointed out, the fading in — trading in defense companies.

So, they have to fix that gap in the law. There's a number of bills out there, Pete. Myself, Raj Krishnamurthy have one, it's HR 1579, but there's a number of them out there. They're bipartisan. This is one issue, Pete, by the way, that members of the Freedom Caucus and the Progressive Caucus all agree on. You're not going to find that very often, yet Speaker Pelosi won't bring them to the floor.

HEGSETH: I mean, it's insider trading. That's exactly what it is, legal insider trading. They enrich themselves while they're supposed to be temporary public servants. You say there's an agreement on the left and the right, but what about the leadership? Let's say Republicans get the gavel. Is there an appetite to bring this kind of real ethics reform?

FITZPATRICK: I hope so. I hope Kevin brings it. I believe he will, and I think that's a good way to show the difference between the different leadership styles. When we take over in January, I think the American public are going to like what they see from HR 1 through HR 10, which are going to be our top 10 priorities. I hope this is one of them, Pete, because we see the markets fluctuating all over the place going up or down two, three percentage points in a day, and that's largely because people are losing faith in the stability of the markets and the information that's disclosed out there. And when we define fiduciary duty only as people inside the company and not people with an oversight role, there's a huge gap in the law. And that's something that needs to be fixed, and there's legislation to fix it.

HEGSETH: Well, I don't know how — it seems like common sense to everybody else who's on the outside, but if you're in the inside and you can get rich, you start to not being willing to vote for things like this. I appreciate you staying on it, Congressman Brian Fitzpatrick. And, by the way, last time I saw you, we were on the very river depicted in that painting behind you, Washington crossing the Delaware. Appreciate your patriotism across the board.

From the Financial Times article:

A broker for Pete Hegseth, the US defence secretary, attempted to make a big investment in major defence companies in the weeks leading up to the US-Israeli attack on Iran, according to three people familiar with the matter.

Hegseth’s broker at Morgan Stanley contacted BlackRock in February about making a multimillion-dollar investment in the asset manager’s Defense Industrials Active ETF, the people said, shortly before the US launched military action against Tehran.

The inquiry on behalf of the high-profile potential client was flagged internally at BlackRock, according to the people familiar with the matter.

According to BlackRock, the $3.2bn equity fund, which carries the ticker IDEF, pursues “growth opportunities by investing in companies that may benefit from increased government spending on defense and security amid geopolitical fragmentation and economic competition."


With research by Tyler Monroe.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters

Release The Tapes! New Emails Draw Attention To Bannon's Epstein Videos

Release The Tapes! New Emails Draw Attention To Bannon's Epstein Videos

Newly released emails to and from the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein include correspondence with former Trump strategist Steve Bannon, expanding on previous reporting that Bannon had up to 15 hours of video footage from interviewing Epstein in 2019.

Bannon has promised to release that footage in early 2026, and the emails underscore the need for a full release — which observers from across the political spectrum have advocated.

Bannon is all over the newly released emails, including strategizing with Epstein

Democrats on the House Oversight Committee on November 12 released a tranche of emails to and from Epstein, who died in prison in August 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges during the first presidency of his longtime friend Donald Trump.

A database of the emails shows some mentioning Bannon as well as correspondence between Bannon and Epstein, demonstrating what appears to be a close working relationship. For instance, in one email reported by Politico Epstein wrote to Bannon in July 2018: “There are many leaders of countries we can organize for you to have one on ones” with if Bannon would visit Europe.

In August 2018, Epstein asked Bannon if he wants to “come to Europe," and Bannon replied: “Yes. But let’s discuss–their is a crazed jihad against u–i’ve never seen anything like it–and I’ve seen a lot."

In a follow-up email, Bannon wrote: “Somebody big has u in the gunsights."

About three months later, in November 2018, the Miami Herald began publishing its series reporting on Epstein’s alleged sex crimes.Then in 2019, Epstein was apparently scheduled to meet Bannon for breakfast on July 7 but was arrested on sex trafficking charges the day prior. Previous Epstein records released by Democrats showed “a 7 a.m. breakfast scheduled with Bannon on Feb. 16, 2019."

The emails shine new light on Bannon's attempts to rehabilitate Epstein’s public image

In 2019, Steve Bannon reportedly recorded “12 to 15 hours” of himself interviewing Epstein for a documentary, which The Hollywood Reporter described as “seemingly designed to get Epstein ready for an image-changing sit-down interview with a news outlet like 60 Minutes, with Bannon playing the part of Mike Wallace.” When confronted this year about the matter, Bannon promised to release the footage in early 2026:

The Hollywood Reporter reported that the unreleased documentary was not the extent of their relationship – author Michael Wolff has claimed Bannon “was a frequent visitor to both Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse and his Paris apartment, and the two exchanged calls and emails almost every day."

Additionally, according to Business Insider, “people who spent time with both men” said “the two acted like friends around each other,” with Bannon advising the notorious sex trafficker on “how to handle his myriad legal and media investigations."

Though Bannon promised over the summer to release a “five-part series" on Epstein next year, elected officials and media figures across the political spectrum have pressed for an earlier release.

Earlier this year, right-wing figures Roger Stone, Benny Johnson, and Ben Shapiro all called on Bannon to release the footage he taped with Epstein. In doing so, they joined Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA), the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, as well as Media Matters president Angelo Carusone, who pointed out that Bannon has gone “radio silent” on the tapes.

Some right-wing personalities use the Epstein emails to attack Bannon

Following the release of the new emails, right-wing figures have continued to highlight Bannon’s connections to Epstein.

Stone attacked Bannon, calling him a “perjurer ,bullshit artist and backstabber” and citing the “over 1700 mentions of Steve Bannon in Jeffrey Epstein's emails released today including many emails between Steve and his pedophile friend Jeffrey!”

Stone also stated: “Bannon took big bucks from Epstein to rehabilitate his image!”

Right-wing host Dana Loesch criticized what she called an “eager-to-showboat Bannon” for allowing Wolff “all access” to Trump’s White House.

And one right-wing figure questioned “why Jeffrey Epstein was writing lists" for Bannon “as recently as 2019,” calling the emails “a gold mine of lord knows what.”

Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones took a different tack, dismissing the presence of Bannon in Epstein’s emails by citing Bannon’s plans to interview Epstein: “It's Steve Bannon coming to do a TV interview with him. That's what he does."

On her November 13 show, right-wing host Megyn Kelly reviewed a tape of a conversation between Wolff, Bannon, Epstein, and former Barack Obama White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler recorded for one of Wolff’s books, describing them as “friendly and upbeat.” She added: “It sounds like friends having a good time, laughing and joking as they try to come up with ways to spin a known sex abuser back into the good graces of the public."

Kelly also asked, “Why was our friend Steve Bannon there, and what does he know of the Wolff tapes? More importantly, what about Bannon’s own tapes?” She continued, “It’s been reported he has 15 hours of his own tapes of this guy, but that they’ve never been released. … We’re pals with him and would love to ask him directly here in a good exchange."

Correction (11/13/25): The first paragraph of this piece originally misstated the year in which Bannon's footage with Epstein was recorded.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters