The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

GENEVA -- A United Nations hearing on the Vatican's compliance with the international anti-torture convention should not be used to review sex abuse scandals, a Vatican envoy made clear Monday at the start of the session.

The Holy See faced the U.N. Committee Against Torture in Geneva as part of that body's regular country review process, in the second such hearing since the Catholic Church clashed with the U.N. Committee on the Rights of the Child in February.

This week's session on Monday and Tuesday should focus strictly on the convention, which defines torture as state-sponsored violence for such purposes as punishment, coercion or discrimination, said Silvano Tomasi, the Vatican's Geneva envoy.

Introducing other themes would jeopardize "those who are truly being abused, tortured and punished," he said in his presentation.

Non-governmental groups including the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests had criticized in their submissions to the committee that the Vatican's own report did not touch on the cases of clergy molesting children.

"The Holy See has consistently side-stepped real accountability and serious reform," SNAP said.

Early in the hearing, committee member Felice Gaer criticized the Holy See for insisting that the anti-torture convention applies only on the territory of the Vatican, and not for clergy operating elsewhere on behalf of the Church.

Tomasi stressed that the Holy See's laws share the U.N. definition of torture, and that the Catholic Church and its media and officials were active in spreading the message against such inhumane treatment.
The committee is scheduled to publish its conclusions on May 23.

Photo: @Doug88888 via Flickr


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Wandrea "Shaye" Moss

YouTube Screenshot

Just who deserves protection in America?

If you observe the folks this country chooses to protect and chooses to ignore, you may get an answer that doesn’t exactly line up with America’s ideals.

Keep reading... Show less
YouTube Screenshot

The First Amendment reflects a principled but shrewd attitude toward religion, which can be summarized: Government should keep its big fat nose out of matters of faith. The current Supreme Court, however, is not in full agreement with that proposition. It is in half agreement — and half is not enough.

This section of the Bill of Rights contains two commands. First, the government can't do anything "respecting an establishment of religion" — that is, sponsoring, subsidizing or providing special favors for religious institutions or individuals.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}