The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from DCReport.


In one of the first moves of the soon-to-be Democratic Majority in the House of Representatives, Virginia Congressman Bobby Scott has been elected chair of the newly christened House Education and Labor Committee.

Yes, you read that right: (Re)Introducing the House Education and Labor Committee.

The House Education and Workforce Committee is no more.

What’s in a name? A lot. It means that the committee will once again be addressing the needs of working people rather than just their employers.

Now some of you old-timers may be having déjà vu all over again. And for good reason.

In 1995, when the Republicans took over the House of Representatives after decades in the diaspora, they changed the name from the Committee on Education and Labor to the Committee on Education and the Workforce. Then, after Democrats retook the House in 2006, they changed the name back to “Education and Labor.” In 2011, when the Republicans regained the throne, they duly changed it back to “Workforce” yet again.

After the 2007 change back, I cited an article by the late New York Times columnist William Safire who explained that the term “Labor” is so objectionable to the delicate Republicans because it conjures up frightening images of “Big Labor” and dreaded unions who support evil Democrats. Better to go over the labor bosses’ heads to all workers, including those not represented by unions.

If Labor was to be replaced, then with what? Not workers; that word is associated with socialism (International Workers of the World (sic), or “wobblies”) and communism (in its manifesto, “Workers of the World — Unite”). But there was another term, coined in 1931, during what revisionist Republicans considered the unfairly maligned Hoover administration: workforce. Most dictionaries gave it two senses (and make it two words): “all employees collectively, or those doing work in a particular firm or industry.”

Expect the Chamber of Commerce to complain that the name change means that the Committee will once again be doing the bidding of the evil labor bosses.

And what are the evil labor bosses advocating? A fair minimum wage, fair and meaningful immigration reform, affordable health care, a secure retirement and Social Security, workplace fairness, better pay and benefits, an end to sexual harassment in the workplace, safer and healthier workplaces—and respect for all workers.

If that’s what putting the word “labor” back into the committee title symbolizes, I’m all for it.

Featured image: A 1936 campaign pro-labor poster for Franklin D. Roosevelt, running for re-election as president, and Herman H. Lehman, running for re-election as New York governor (Collection of Merrill C. Berman, via



Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Sen. Ted Cruz

A group of lawyers has submitted a 15-page ethics complaint to the State Bar of Texas demanding an investigation of Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) for his “leading role” in the far-reaching Republican effort to keep former President Trump in power despite his reelection loss.

The complaint — filed by the 65 Project, an organization of lawyers seeking to hold attorneys accountable for lending a hand in pro-Trump efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 elections — called for an examination of Cruz’s conduct in the weeks before Election Day in 2020 and on January 6, 2021, the day of the Capitol insurrection.

Keep reading... Show less

The House Select Committee, a bipartisan congressional panel looking into the Capitol insurrection, sent a letter on Thursday requesting an interview with a House Republican, Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA), who it said led a tour through parts of the Capitol complex on January 5, 2021 — the day before a pro-Trump mob stormed the halls of Congress.

In the letter to Loudermilk, the select committee’s chairman and vice-chairwoman, Reps. Bennie Thompson (D-MS) and Liz Cheney (R-WY), said the panel had seen evidence that “directly contradicts” the claim made by Republicans on the Committee on House Administration — “of which you’re a member” — that they had reviewed security footage of the days before the Capitol attack and concluded that “[t]here were no tours, no large groups, [and] no one with MAGA hats on.”

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}