By Allison Brito

Moniz, McCarthy Fight Off Climate Change Deniers At House Hearing

September 18, 2013 7:57 pm Category: Memo Pad 7 Comments A+ / A-

david mckinley

On Wednesday, the House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on Energy and Power heard testimony from a scientist and an environmental expert regarding the Obama administration’s Clean Air Act. True to form, some Republicans on the committee used the opportunity to spread misinformation about climate change.

Ernest Moniz, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), and Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Gina McCarthy told committee members why they believe there is urgency for Congress to act on legislation to invest in new energy sources, and reduce carbon emissions that will improve the environment over the next decade.

Moniz stated in his prepared testimony, “The evidence is overwhelming, the science is clear, and the threat from climate change is real and urgent.”

“The threat of a warming planet to our communities, our infrastructure and our way of life is also clear,” he continued. “Rising sea levels and increasingly severe droughts, heat waves, wildfires, and major storms are already costing our economy billions of dollars a year and these impacts are only going to grow more severe. Common sense demands that we take action.”

McCarthy offered her own proof in her opening remarks. “Climate change is one of the greatest challenges of our time,” she said. “Based on the evidence, more than 97 percent of climate scientists are convinced that human-caused climate change is occurring. If our changing climate goes unchecked, it will have devastating impacts on the United States and the planet.”

Usually eager to call for scientific evidence of climate change, some Republicans decided that this time they were going to teach the expert witnesses a thing or two about the subject.

Representative David McKinley (R-WV) said in the hearing, “Actually we can say over 40 years, there’s been almost no increase in temperature—very slight. In fact, even with increased greenhouse CO2 level emissions, the Arctic ice has actually increased by 60 percent.”

“Also, Antarctica is expanding,” McKinley said. “But more importantly, this report coming out of the United Nations, the IPCC report coming up is saying that most experts believe by 2083…the benefits of climate change will still outweigh the harm.”

The facts McKinley referenced were from a report done by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in 2007. Yet just this month, Rajendra Pachauri, a leading scientist for the IPCC who worked on this year’s volume of that same report, made a statement that mirrored precisely what Moniz and McCarthy were warning of during the House hearing on Wednesday. Pachauri cautioned that the world is “five minutes before midnight” with regard to climate change, adding “Today we have the knowledge to be able to map out the debits and to understand what we have done to the condition of this planet.”

The report makes no mention of a 60 percent decrease in Arctic ice, or Antarctic expansion — it provides no long trends and admits a lack of accurate measurements. It does state: “Reductions of Arctic sea ice and glaciers, reductions in the duration of river and lake ice in much of the sub-Arctic, and a recent warming of permafrost in nearly all areas for which measurements are available are consistent with the recent changes in Arctic surface air temperatures.” It also notes that “surface air temperatures in the Arctic have warmed at approximately twice the global rate.”

In the Antarctic, the report says, “Direct measurements reveal considerable spatial variability in temperature trends in Antarctica. All meteorological stations on the Antarctic Peninsula show strong and significant warming over the last 50 years.”

Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA) responded to McKinley’s outrageous assertions. “I think this illustrates why we need a committee where we bring in the scientists. I just thought the statements that the gentleman from West Virginia read to us were incredibly inaccurate and contrary to everything everyone in the scientific community has to say, including Mr. Moniz,” Waxman said. “We need scientists to come in here and talk about science.”

Near the end of the hearing Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) asked Moniz, “Is there really a significant difference of opinion about the science of climate change?”

Moniz answered, “At the level of the broad impacts, in my view there is none.”

Photo: TV19-DD Meighen via Flickr.com

Moniz, McCarthy Fight Off Climate Change Deniers At House Hearing Reviewed by on . On Wednesday, the House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on Energy and Power heard testimony from a scientist and an environmental expert regarding the Obama ad On Wednesday, the House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on Energy and Power heard testimony from a scientist and an environmental expert regarding the Obama ad Rating:

More by Allison Brito

The Hillary Circus Is Coming To A Town Near You

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton launched a book tour on Tuesday to promote the release of her new memoir, Hard Choices, beginning at a Barnes & Noble in New York City. Hundreds of supporters flocked to the first stop in downtown Manhattan, bearing their “Hillary” t-shirts, hats, and stickers — and making the event an all-out

Read more...

Poll Roundup: Is McConnell Safe In Kentucky?

As the 2014 midterm elections draw closer, pollsters across the country will begin releasing masses of data and their predictions of who will control the House of Representatives, the Senate, and statehouses across the country. We’ll put those predictions in focus and provide a brief summary of key polls. Here’s our roundup from the week

Read more...

Controversy Hampers Rising GOP Star Wehby As Primary Approaches

Republicans in Oregon were hopeful that Salem-based pediatric neurosurgeon Monica Wehby could give Democrats a run for their money in the state’s 2014 Senate race. But the spotlight that has shone on the first-time candidate may have them rethinking whether Wehby is the formidable candidate they hoped for. On Friday, Politico reported that Wehby was accused of stalking

Read more...

Tags

Comments

  • disqus_ivSI3ByGmh

    Ya gotta love these guys in the House. They glommed onto a report that even the folks responsible for it have stated it was edited to satisfy the beliefs of individuals in the administration, and not based on science.

  • silence dogood

    Hay sheep the scam has been exposed. Find a new phony issue to try and scare people with. Will the fraud Gore have to give back his millions now. What dopes !

    • Agent Michael Scarn

      Your ignorance is only matched by your blindness. Yell louder, maybe that’ll stop the melting polar ice caps. Let me guess, you’re the person who still believes you’re not failing at life when all facts prove otherwise.

      • silence dogood

        I don’t really know what’s going on with the ice cap any more than you do. By the way it is singular. Polar ice capS are generally considered formations on the planet Mars.

        • Guest

          Not knowing this shows YOUR ignorance.

          • silence dogood

            Ten years ago Gore said there wouldn’t be any ice left in 2014. There now seems to be a great deal more than last year. Only the sheep buy into the notion of “man made” global warming. Try thinking for yourself.

  • Agent Michael Scarn

    The GOP is the party of illiterate anti-science factually challenged dinosaurs. We can only hope they go the same way as the last group before they bring about another ELE.

scroll to top