Tag: director of national intelligence
Roger Stone Touted 'Longtime Friend' Pulte For DNI To Probe 2020 Election

Roger Stone Touted 'Longtime Friend' Pulte For DNI To Probe 2020 Election

On his radio show, notorious political operative and Trump confidant Roger Stone has touted his friendship with acting Director of National Intelligence Bill Pulte, celebrating that he thinks Pulte will use his position to investigate voter fraud and “finally reveal what really happened in the 2020 election.”

In their new book, Regime Change: Inside the Imperial Presidency of Donald Trump, Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan reported that Stone — once kept at a distance from the White House — has taken a greater role in Trump’s second term in office, including helping connect the president with Pulte.

Most of Trump’s first-term aides despised him [Stone], and he was held at an even greater distance in term one amid the Russia conspiracy investigation. Trump would give Stone—who used the phrase “Stop the Steal” in 2016 and maintained that 2020 was “rigged”—a last-minute pardon in January 2021. But Stone never visited the White House in that term.
Stone’s access changed during the 2024 campaign. Susie Wiles and other top Trump campaign advisors had their own long-standing relationships with Stone. They believed he was smart and saw him as a victim of the same DOJ “weaponization” that Trump had complained about. … The fights and rapprochements between Trump and Stone over forty years were almost impossible to track. But at the end of the day, Trump always came back to Roger Stone. In his second term, he stopped pretending otherwise.

Stone’s counsel was taken up by Trump on a number of occasions — the book reports that he pushed the president to select Tulsi Gabbard as director of national intelligence and “advocated relentlessly” for a pardon of former Honduran president and convicted drug trafficker Juan Orlando Hernández. According to Haberman and Swan, Stone also “squired Pulte around Mar-a-Lago during the 2024 transition.”

Enter Bill Pulte. An heir to a homebuilding fortune, Pulte had come to Trump’s notice in 2019 with some favorable tweets; he was also a Trump donor, and he had later connected with Roger Stone, who squired Pulte around Mar-a-Lago during the 2024 transition. Pulte had his eye on the position of secretary of housing and urban development, but he would ultimately accept the directorship of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), a low-profile office he would turn into a howitzer for Trump’s retribution agenda.

Building on this in-person effort to connect Pulte with the president, Stone has repeatedly used his radio show to promote Pulte after Trump named him to replace Gabbard as acting DNI.

On June 3, Stone called Pulte “extraordinarily capable” and “extraordinarily loyal to President Donald J. Trump” while slamming his critics in Congress as “unqualified to be in public office, in my opinion.” On June 5, Stone described Pulte as a “longtime friend of mine, someone I originally recommended for the job of Federal Housing Finance Administrator.” Stone further attacked Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-LA), Susan Collins (R-ME), and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) as “RINOs” for their support of a Democratic amendment which would have barred Pulte from serving as DNI while he also remains head of FHFA.

Stone was also clear about Pulte’s ultimate goal as DNI: Relitigating Trump’s 2020 election defeat with debunked claims of fraud.

“The big enchilada, that 2020 election,” Stone argued on June 3. “How is it that 81 million people voted for Joe Biden? How is it that more people voted in the state of Pennsylvania than are registered to vote? … How is it that 300,000 printed ballots that were supposedly mailed in, but had never been folded in half and thus were never mailed, popped in out of nowhere in Georgia, Detroit, and elsewhere, all at the same time?” He further gloated on June 5 that “the intelligence community is particularly hysterical” that Trump said Pulte may “get to the bottom of the truth regarding the 2020 elections,” adding, “If what the president says is true, that Pulte is going to finally reveal what really happened in the 2020 election, you can see why the Democrats are so scared.”

Pulte’s appointment to DNI was widely embraced by prominent election conspiracy theorists, including some who have pushed in recent months for Trump to declare a national emergency and seize “king-like powers” over the midterm elections. On June 10, War Room host and former Trump strategist Steve Bannon called Pulte the “perfect choice to run DNI right now,” suggesting he is there to “get to the bottom of the 2020 stolen election.” Conspiracy theorist Jack Posobiec likewise hypothesized on June 17 that Pulte’s opponents are afraid he will expose “some kind of foreign interference or some kind of penetration of those election systems down there in Fulton County,” Georgia, which led to “a massive, massive problem with that 2020 count.”

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters

Pulte's Appointment Of RNC Election Conspiracy Theorist Shows His Hand

Pulte's Appointment Of RNC Election Conspiracy Theorist Shows His Hand

A newly installed top intelligence official in the Trump administration appeared on a so-called election integrity call with leading figures in the election denial movement in 2024, and has been repeatedly praised by the MAGA activist who coordinated the meeting.

The New York Times reported on June 26 that former Republican National Committee official Christina Norton would serve as chief of staff in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence under Bill Pulte, its acting director. From the Times:

Mr. Pulte’s decision to put Ms. Norton in the powerful post is likely to further fuel concerns among Democrats, intelligence officials and state and local election administrators that he intends to focus on hunting for evidence of election fraud at the behest of President Trump.
Mr. Trump has said Mr. Pulte is expected to work on election security matters, prompting fears by some officials that he could try to influence the midterm elections. Other officials expect him to declassify documents related to issues that have preoccupied Mr. Trump, including the inquiry into Russian interference in the 2016 election.
While at the R.N.C., Ms. Norton oversaw a poll watcher program that included conservative conspiracy theorists, including Jack Posobiec, who helped spread the false “Pizzagate” stories about child abuse at a restaurant in Washington.

In Norton’s capacity overseeing the RNC’s so-called election integrity initiative, she attended an April 4, 2024, zoom call coordinated by Steve Stern, a right-wing podcaster who regularly convenes such meetings.

Stern has been a central figure in what former Trump adviser Steve Bannon refers to as the “precinct strategy,” a way for grassroots MAGA activists to participate directly in election administration — and potentially undermine the results.

During Norton’s presentation on the 2024 call, she cast doubt on the legitimacy of the 2020 election.

“Certainly, there is no question that in 2020 Democrats and their far-left allies exploited the pandemic to disregard election laws on the books,” Norton said. “States altered their voting procedures in the middle of an election year, in the middle of a pandemic, without time for meaningful adoption of safeguards.” (There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election.)

Stern repeatedly praised Norton over the course of 2024, both before and after Trump’s win, in appearances on Bannon’s War Room podcast. On the day of the April 4 call, Stern said Norton was working “hard on letting the people know that she's really in the game,” adding: “Christina Norton's phenomenal."

Bannon praised Norton’s presence on the call and the emerging “symbiotic relationship” between “new management of the RNC” and outside groups.

In October 2024, Stern appeared on War Room again and claimed Trump won in 2020. “We need to see how these people are going to cheat because he can win the election like he did in 2020 and lose because they're going to bring in all these votes,” Stern said, adding: “Christina Norton is doing a fantastic job."

After Trump’s victory the following month, Stern detailed the close working relationship between Norton at the RNC and his network of so-called election integrity activists.

“Not only did we get out to vote and get out to vote early, but we protected the vote with Christina Norton from the RNC, which took me a lot of time to work with her, but we did it,” Stern said. He added: “I got a gold star from Christina Norton, who we're going to try to get on tomorrow, from the RNC, who helped us so much."

A former U.S. intelligence official told MS NOW that Norton’s appointment “signals as clearly as could be that Pulte has been put at ODNI to misuse the awesome power of the U.S. intelligence community to interfere in the upcoming midterm elections.” Neither Pulte nor Norton appear to have any relevant experience in intelligence or national security.

Norton also served as Pulte’s top aide at the federal housing agency he oversees. In that role, Pulte has used the agency to target Trump’s political opponents, including New York Attorney General Letitia James and Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA).

Bannon has been a major booster of Pulte’s, suggesting that the acting director of national intelligence would “get to the bottom of the 2020 stolen election,” possibly through a theoretical upcoming “task force.” Bannon also supported Trump’s decision to pull the nomination of Jay Clayton to head ODNI in a move that cleared the way for Pulte to take the role in an acting capacity.

Trump has staffed the government with prominent election deniers, including MAGA activist and right-wing media figure Heather Honey, who now works for the office within the Department of Homeland Security that oversees elections.

Update (6/30/26): One day after this blog was published, Bannon praised Pulte’s hiring of Norton as “one of the top election fraud people in all of the RNC to be his chief of staff.” Bannon said Pulte is “signaling where he's going on this,” adding that “my understanding is that there is [sic] going to be real revelations about the stealing of the 2020 election.”

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters

Why Trump Appoints Temporary Flunkies Like Pulte To Top Federal Posts

Why Trump Appoints Temporary Flunkies Like Pulte To Top Federal Posts

When President Donald Trump appointed Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte as the new acting head of National Intelligence, critics were quick to ask what, exactly, a former residential homebuilder knew about international spycraft.

The answer appears to be “nothing.”

Pulte earned Trump’s favor after using his role at FHFA to launch multiple mortgage fraud investigations against some of the president’s most vocal critics, including Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell of California, New York Attorney General Letitia James, and Federal Reserve Board Governor Lisa Cook.

The Government Accountability Office is currently reviewing Pulte’s investigations as a possible misuse of his office, but that didn’t stop Trump from elevating Pulte to an even more powerful position.

Pulte isn’t the only official Trump has shifted into a position of immense power after a conspicuous show of loyalty. In fact, more government agencies are filling up with acting officials than ever before, including the National Security Agency, the Departments of Justice and Labor, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and even the National Archives.

That isn’t an accident. Trump’s second term has been marked by the installation of acting officials to avoid the thorny process of Senate confirmation hearings—a headache Trump has been especially keen to avoid as his relationship with Senate Republicans crumbles.

Pulte’s nomination as acting National Intelligence director is a prime example of how Trump is exploiting the Federal Vacancies Reform Act to undermine the clear intent of the law and to evade Senate transparency.

Unlike other roles, National Intelligence legally requires confirmed directors to have “extensive national security expertise.”

Pulte, the owner of a home construction company with no background in national security or intelligence, certainly falls short of that bar. But as an acting official, he can exercise the full scope of his power—and carry out Trump’s personal wishes—without ever facing a single question about his lack of expertise.

Senate Republicans were already irritated by Trump’s ousting of GOP Sen. John Cornyn of Texas in favor of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who many of them find personally odious.

And when Trump’s rancid $1.8 billion “weaponization” fund was approved, Republicans balked at the thought of defending payouts to Jan. 6 insurrectionists during the heat of the midterm campaign season. GOP Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky denounced the proposal as a “slush fund to pay people who assault cops.”

Last week, Trump quietly abandoned his scheme.

The author of Trump’s $1.8 billion political landmine was none other than acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, another Trump loyalist chosen more for his submissiveness than for any hint of competence.

Despite only having the legal cover to hold his job for another 210 days, the White House is already hatching a plan to let Blanche—and other acting officials—remain in their roles indefinitely. So much for the Senate!

Under normal circumstances, Blanche would be required to leave the acting attorney general role on Oct. 29, which would set up a heated confirmation fight just five days before voters head to the polls. But if Trump “nominates” Blanche for the permanent job without ever moving his confirmation forward, the countdown clock would effectively stop.

That also explains why Trump has failed to nominate any permanent successors for the multiple roles currently being held by his hand-picked acting appointees. Trump is wagering that Senate Republicans, already beaten down by months of brutal polling and the prospect of losing both chambers of Congress in November, will be in no rush to have hearings for Trump’s nominees. He’s probably right.

In place of the transparency and accountability of public hearings, the American people will get only silence and excuses from a White House that long ago stopped caring about any opinion other than Trump’s.

As confirmed officials depart the administration and find themselves replaced with willing functionaries in active roles, Trump only tightens his grip on an executive branch that has increasingly become a weapon of his personal vengeance.

Trump’s demand for more control over the government may satisfy his lust for revenge, but it’s also alienating Republicans from the voters they’ll need to persuade if they want to maintain their congressional majority.

Trump’s slush fund debacle is a reminder that a government full of flunkies may make Trump feel powerful, but it’s a terrible way to get anything done.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos


Tulsi Gabbard's 'Russiagate' Conspiracy Crumbles In Fox Interview

Tulsi Gabbard's 'Russiagate' Conspiracy Crumbles In Fox Interview

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s claim that former President Barack Obama directed a “treasonous conspiracy” against President Donald Trump took a hit on Tuesday night when she was asked the most straightforward question possible about her allegations during a Fox News interview. Her response demonstrates how painfully little she’s actually found — and how far over their skis the MAGAverse and Trump administration have gotten in response to her absurd charges.

In mid-July, as Trump sought to defuse a right-wing revolt over his administration’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, Gabbard claimed to have uncovered and referred to the Justice Department documents which she said showed that at the end of Obama’s second term, his administration attempted “to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup.” Her ridiculous and revisionist claims were widely touted by Fox stars and other MAGA propagandists eager to help Trump change the story from his former friend, the deceased sex offender Epstein.

Attorney General Pam Bondi has reportedly ordered federal prosecutors to launch a grand jury probe in response to Gabbard’s referral. Responding to that news on Monday night, Fox host Sean Hannity suggested that the probe’s targets could include Obama, former FBI Director James Comey, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan, and former special counsel Jack Smith. Fox legal analyst Gregg Jarrett replied that “those are appropriate names,” adding that “dozens, I think, could be charged as co-conspirators,” including former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

But a “telling exchange” on Tuesday night between Gabbard and Fox’s Laura Ingraham, first flagged by CNN’s Aaron Blake, shows that what Gabbard considers the most damning revelations of Obama’s malfeasance were actually reviewed years ago by the GOP-led Senate Select Intelligence Committee, whose membership at the time included current Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

Ingraham asked Gabbard: “Now, director, you said there was irrefutable evidence that Obama was the mastermind of this intelligence manipulation and the perpetuation of the Russia hoax. What is that irrefutable evidence for our viewers tonight?”

Gabbard replied that the documents she had uncovered showed “how President Obama directed that a National Security Council meeting be called to talk about Russia, that the report that came out of that meeting was filled with tasks that were delivered by James Clapper's assistant to John Brennan and to other elements of the intelligence community — John Brennan was the head of the CIA at the time — all saying per the president's direction, per the president's order.”

She continued:

TULSI GABBARD: And very specifically, they were tasked to create an intelligence assessment that detailed how Moscow tried to influence the election. Not “if,” but “how.” And this was the beginning of this manufactured intelligence assessment where they knowingly wrote things in this assessment that were false, and they knew they were false. They knew that they were basing it on discredited intelligence or documents like the Steele dossier that was politically motivated and that they knew was false, and this was how they came up with — with the Russia hoax that was then weaponized and used to try to delegitimize the president, President Trump, and to try to ultimately enact this years-long coup throughout his entire four years of his first administration.

But Gabbard’s discoveries aren’t sinister — they aren’t even new.

The 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment that Obama ordered is the subject of the fourth volume of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence’s bipartisan Russia investigation, a 158-page document published in April 2020.

That report states that at a December 6, 2016, meeting of the National Security Council, “President Obama instructed Director Clapper to have the Intelligence Community prepare a comprehensive report on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.” This was apparently such a banal request that it drew no commentary from the report’s authors.

The committee also reviewed the assessment itself and concluded that, far from some sort of malicious attack on Trump, it was “coherent and well-constructed,” featuring “proper analytic tradecraft,” and its authors experienced “no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions.” From the report:

From a report of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, "Russian active Measures and Interference in the 2016 U.S. Election, Volume 4: Review of the Intelligence Community Assessment"

Then-committee Chair Richard Burr (R-NC) issued a statement alongside the report in which he said, “The ICA reflects strong tradecraft, sound analytical reasoning, and proper justification of disagreement in the one analytical line where it occurred,” adding, “The Committee found no reason to dispute the Intelligence Community’s conclusions.”

Gabbard’s position appears to be that asking for and receiving intelligence showing that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election on Trump’s behalf is an attack on Trump by definition — one that Bondi now seeks to criminalize. But the Justice Department and the Senate Select Intelligence Committee under Rubio’s leadership came to the same conclusion.

We’ve seen all this before. Fox — and Hannity in particular — spent years promising viewers that investigations into the Russia probe were about to finally send all their political enemies to prison, only for those efforts to come up short or fall apart.

Unfortunately, Trump’s second-term appointees to top law enforcement and intelligence leadership are people like Gabbard — conspiracy theorists who are in positions of power because they’ve demonstrated to the president, through myriad Fox News appearances, their willingness to put his desires above all else.

So here we are, doing it all over again.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World