Tag: military bases
U.S. Army

GOP Candidates Vow To Restore Confederate Traitor Names To Army Bases

The U.S. Army officially renamed a Louisiana base on Tuesday, a move to honor a Black World War I hero rather than a Confederate traitor against the U.S. The former Fort Polk is now Fort Johnson, just as, 10 days earlier, Fort Bragg became Fort Liberty. Republicans are not taking these changes well.

On Friday, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis pledged that, if elected president, he would rename Fort Liberty, restoring Braxton Bragg’s name to honor. “It’s an iconic name and an iconic base, and we’re not going to let political correctness run amok in North Carolina,” DeSantis said at the North Carolina GOP Convention. The next day, Mike Pence sounded the same notes at the same event, saying, “We will end the political correctness in the hallways of the Pentagon, and North Carolina will once again be home to Fort Bragg.”

There’s no word yet on whether Fort Polk was “iconic” enough to deserve this level of outrage, but presumably, that will come when DeSantis, Pence, and other Republicans campaign in Louisiana.

Bragg was “widely considered among the least successful military leaders” of the Civil War, according to Military.com. He was so unpopular that a 2016 book about him had the title “Braxton Bragg: The Most Hated Man of the Confederacy.” By contrast, Leonidas Polk, the general after whom Fort Johnson was previously named, was extremely popular with his troops—but, like Bragg, known as a poor military leader. His “military qualities were lacking,” the American Battlefield Trust politely puts it. He had “an ineptitude for logistics,” according to NCpedia.

Even if you set aside the whole “fought against the United States to preserve slavery” thing (which you emphatically should not), are these the generals you want your Army bases to honor?

Fort Johnson is named after Sgt. William Henry Johnson, who was on the front lines in World War I with one other soldier when they were attacked by a German raiding party of at least 12 soldiers. When his fellow soldier was at risk of being taken prisoner by the Germans, Johnson “exposed himself to grave danger by advancing from his position to engage an enemy soldier in hand-to-hand combat,” according to the Army’s biography of him. “Wielding only a knife and being seriously wounded, Johnson continued fighting, took his Bolo knife and stabbed it through an enemy soldier's head.”

In renaming the base, Brig. Gen. David Gardner said, “Sgt. Henry Johnson embodied the warrior spirit, and we are deeply honored to bear his name at the Home of Heroes.” But while Johnson’s courage made him briefly famous—he received France’s highest military honor and former President Theodore Roosevelt called him one of the “five bravest Americans” to serve in the war—he was denied a Purple Heart and a pension despite injuries that made it difficult for him to work. He died 11 years later, at 32, and was initially thought to have been buried in a pauper’s grave. It took decades for historians to discover that he had been buried in Arlington National Cemetery with full honors. Johnson’s name is a perfect one to replace that of a Confederate traitor, as his story shows not just outstanding courage but the ways the nation failed Black service members.

It will be interesting to see if, or maybe it’s when and how, Republican presidential candidates come out to argue that Johnson is a less worthy figure to honor than Leonidas Polk, a slaveholder as well as an incompetent general. In Fort Bragg, DeSantis and Pence have the easy out of it not having been named after another human being whose record can be compared to Bragg’s—and as we know, liberty is one more thing that Republicans claim to honor while in reality crapping all over it.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Josh Hawley

Senate Rejects Hawley’s Attempt To Preserve Confederate Military Base Names

The Senate rejected an effort by Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) just before the July 4 holiday to preserve the names of U.S. military facilities named after leaders of the Confederacy.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell filed a cloture motion to end debate on the bill without a vote on Hawley's amendment.

The amendment would have eliminated a requirement — agreed to on June 11 by the Senate Armed Services Committee — that the Defense Department remove the names of Confederate generals from 10 major military bases within three years.

Read NowShow less
Supreme Court Sides With Military In Protest Case

Supreme Court Sides With Military In Protest Case

By David G. Savage, Tribune Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court in a unanimous decision ruled Wednesday that military commanders have broad power to keep protesters off of bases, including the public roads that pass through them.

The decision upholds the prosecution of a veteran peace activist from Santa Barbara, Calif., who repeatedly returned to protest on a highway outside Vandenberg Air Force Base, even after he had been ordered to stay away.

John Dennis Apel had been barred from Vandenberg in 2003 after he threw blood on a base sign. But he returned repeatedly in the years after to protest inside a designated protest zone along Highway 1.

Officers warned him he was violating the order to stay away, and in 2010, he was escorted away and prosecuted for violating the order. A magistrate convicted him and ordered him to pay $355 in fines and fees.

He appealed and won a reversal from the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which held that the military did not have “exclusive possession” of the public roads and protest areas near the base.

The Supreme Court reversed that decision Wednesday, but without delving into the First Amendment. Writing for the court, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. said the authority of a base commander “reaches all property within the defined boundaries of a military place. … Those limits do not change when the commander invites the public to use a portion of the base for a road, a school, a bus stop, or a protest area, especially when the commander reserves authority to protect military property by, among other things, excluding vandals and trespassers.”

He noted that because the high court had not dealt with the First Amendment issue in the case, Apel was free to raise that point in a further appeal to the 9th Circuit.

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor agreed with the decision but said they believed that “it is questionable whether Apel’s ouster from the protest area can withstand constitutional review.”

Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. added a separate statement to fault Ginsburg for voicing a view on an issue that was not part of the case.

Photo: OZinOH via Flickr