The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Missouri Senator Josh Hawley

Photo by Mizzou CAFNR licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0

The Senate rejected an effort by Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) just before the July 4 holiday to preserve the names of U.S. military facilities named after leaders of the Confederacy.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell filed a cloture motion to end debate on the bill without a vote on Hawley's amendment.

The amendment would have eliminated a requirement — agreed to on June 11 by the Senate Armed Services Committee — that the Defense Department remove the names of Confederate generals from 10 major military bases within three years.

The bipartisan provision was included as part of the larger annual defense package, the National Defense Authorization Act.

Hawley sought unanimous consent to get a vote on removing it, but a colleague objected.

"I've been told that we can't even have a vote," Hawley lamented afterward, in a floor speech. "No vote! We can't even call the roll on this. No, we've just got to swallow it and move on as the woke cancel culture moves on, steamrolling our history and our traditions, and yes, our best traditions as Americans."

The move comes as the nation reckons with its racist history and present.

Protesters around the world have marched to demand an end systemic racism and, in the United States, have pushed to remove statues of those who led and fought with the Confederacy during the Civil War.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), who proposed the name-change rule, said previously that it was "long past time to end the tribute to white supremacy on our military installations."

Hawley objected to the requirement at the time, calling it a "left-wing assault on history."

"This latest effort to unilaterally rename bases and remove war memorials, all behind closed doors, smacks of the cancel culture the Left wants to impose on the nation," the first-term senator said. "Any discussion about renaming bases should be had in the light of day, out in the open, and it should involve military families, veterans, and state and local stakeholders."

He added that "the mob will keep marching through all our cultural institutions until every American whom the woke crowd deems unjust is cancelled."

Hawley's proposal would have removed the renaming requirement and replaced it with a commission to "gather input from military families and veterans" and suggest specific name changes to Congress.

Donald Trump has similarly defended keeping the names of Confederate figures on U.S. bases, tweeting in early June that "these Monumental and very Powerful Bases have become part of a Great American Heritage, and a history of Winning, Victory, and Freedom."

He vowed that his administration would "not even consider the renaming of these Magnificent and Fabled Military Installations."

If the House and Senate pass the annual Defense authorization — which is generally regarded as "must-pass" legislation — with the renaming language in it, Trump will have to decide whether to veto the whole bill or accept the new requirement.

He claimed Tuesday that he would veto if the name-change requirement were included.

Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning


YouTube Screenshot

In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v Wade, ending the constitutional right to an abortion after almost 50 years, some conservatives and mainstream media outlets have suggested that anti-abortionists may be willing to support more generous family welfare programs to offset the financial burden of forced birth. These suggestions, whether made in bad faith or ignorance, completely misunderstand the social function of prohibiting abortion, which is to exert control over women and all people who can get pregnant.

In adopting or replicating the right’s framing of anti-abortionists as “pro-life,” these outlets mystify the conservative movement’s history and current goals. Conservatives have sought to dismantle the United State’s limited safety net since the passage of the New Deal. Expecting the movement to reverse course now is absurd, and suggesting so serves primarily to obfuscate the economic hardship the end of Roe will inflict on people forced to carry a pregnancy to term.

Keep reading... Show less

Arizona Republican Senate candidate Blake Masters

YouTube Screenshot

Donald Trump's hand-picked candidate Blake Masters is the latest to endorse the unpopular idea.

The front-runner in the GOP primary to run for Senate in Arizona in November against Democratic incumbent Sen. Mark Kelly suggested on June 23 that Social Security should be privatized, an approach to the popular government program that experts say could jeopardize a vital financial lifeline for retired Americans.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}