The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Photo by Pexels from Pixabay

Since April, I've been telling my students that their generation will be the ultimate storytellers of this pandemic, as COVID-19's legacy will surely endure for decades. This semester, I've taken it a step further and required them to keep pandemic diaries.

Their weekly 500-word entries will help me gauge their writing progress and give me glimpses into how they are doing in this challenging time. Just as importantly, they will create a written record of who they were — in their lives and in this time in history.

The seeds for this idea sprouted during my reading of Erik Larson's outstanding new book, "The Splendid and the Vile: A Saga of Churchill, Family, and Defiance During the Blitz."

Early in Larson's book, he mentions the Mass-Observation, "an organization launched in Britain two years before the war that recruited hundreds of volunteers to keep daily diaries with the goal of helping sociologists better understand ordinary British life." Once World War II broke out, the diaries created a treasure trove of historical accounts in the country's darkest hours.

Eager to learn more about these diaries, I hunted down Simon Garfield's 2005 book, "We Are at War: The Remarkable Diaries of Five Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times." The book begins in 1939 and ends a year later with the Battle of Britain and the start of the Blitz. It is an "invaluable record of quiet lives transformed by events far beyond their control," Garfield writes.

"The reason why I am keen on Mass-Observation," one 28-year-old man wrote, "is because it wants to know and inform, tell all classes about the emotion, acts, thoughts and struggles of the ordinary 'average' man and woman. Too many articles and books are on high-flown subjects, there are none about the prosaic things of everyday."

A 41-year-old woman wrote, "We all feel, under pressure of work, that our language is becoming stronger and our manners less polite."

Another woman, age 37: "Absent-mindedness and poor memory seem rife ... Mr Mitchell and I both find the same thing, that the strained atmosphere has upset our sense of time. An hour seems like a day, and a day like a week. The month of August seems to have lasted for decades."

The longer this pandemic drags on, the more I see the value in writing about the daily mess of life, regardless of our age. Writing helps us sort out how we are changing, but it also allows us to see what parts of us remain.

Life in its minutiae is what distinguishes our experience from everyone else's. The public historical record will help us remember the day schools closed, for example, or when our governor ordered all residents to wear masks. But how did we feel the day the death toll hit 1,000? 10,000? 180,000? Who were we on day 60? Day 90? When did we first become afraid? How did we find our courage?

If you'd like to keep a pandemic journal and wonder where to start, how about here, with this question: Who am I today, in the final days of summer? Or, my students' first diary prompt: How is my life different now?

As the diaries of British citizens make clear, one keeps on living. We grow vegetable gardens and try new recipes. We return to long-dormant hobbies or finally make time to learn new ones. Zoom and FaceTime are now lifelines to those we love. My daughter often smiles and shakes her head at me as I silently watch her young children do what little kids do: They draw and color giant pictures, make glorious messes of their faces as they eat, and talk in imaginary voices as they play with the dollhouse.

"As long as you're willing to hold up your phone," I tell her, "I'm going to watch them." I study them for signs of growth, every little change that is happening without me.

Later, I write it all down in my pandemic diary. Because I want them to know I was still watching and that hundreds of miles are no distance at all for a loving heart.

And if I write it all down, maybe one day I will feel the warmth of my grandson's hand on mine as we share a memory of life during the pandemic.

"Your kite?" I'll say. "Of course I remember your kite. You were 4. It was a hot, sunny day, but you wore your Batman boots as you ran so fast, round and round the giant tree. I thought that kite might lift you up into the sky."

I remember, I will tell him. I was there.

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist and professional in residence at Kent State University's school of journalism. She is the author of two non-fiction books, including "...and His Lovely Wife," which chronicled the successful race of her husband, Sherrod Brown, for the U.S. Senate. She is also the author of The New York Times bestselling novel, "The Daughters of Erietown." To find out more about Connie Schultz ( and read her past columns, please visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Mark Levin

Politico reported Friday that John Eastman, the disgraced ex-law professor who formulated many of former President Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results, was also apparently in communication with Fox News host Mark Levin. The story gets even more interesting from there, revealing the shell game that right-wing media personalities engage in while doubling as political operatives.

A legal filing by Eastman’s attorneys reveals that, among the messages Eastman is still attempting to conceal from the House January 6 committee are 12 pieces of correspondence with an individual matching Levin’s description as “a radio talk show host, is also an attorney, former long-time President (and current board chairman) of a public interest law firm, and also a former fellow at The Claremont Institute.” Other details, including a sloppy attempt to redact an email address, also connect to Levin, who did not respond to Politico’s requests for comment.

Keep reading... Show less

Sen. Wendy Rogers

Youtube Screenshot

There have been powerful indicators of the full-bore radicalization of the Republican Party in the past year: the 100-plus extremist candidates it fielded this year, the apparent takeover of the party apparatus in Oregon, the appearance of Republican officials at white nationalist gatherings. All of those are mostly rough gauges or anecdotal evidence, however; it’s been difficult to get a clear picture of just how deeply the extremism has penetrated the party.

Using social media as a kind of proxy for their real-world outreach—a reasonable approach, since there are few politicians now who don’t use social media—the Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights decided to get a clearer picture of the reach of extremist influences in official halls of power by examining how many elected officials participate in extremist Facebook groups. What it found was deeply troubling: 875 legislators in all 50 states, constituting nearly 22% of all elected GOP lawmakers, identified as participating members of extremist Facebook groups.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}