Start your day with National Memo Newsletter
The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning
Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-NE) is raising money for his legal defense fund by falsely claiming that he has been charged with "fake crimes" and that federal agents are targeting him because of his politics.
Fortenberry is facing a federal indictment on accepting a large campaign donation from a foreign national in violation of federal law, and for lying to the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
"Politically motivated FBI agents can and do lie in order to manufacture fake crimes against patriots," Fortenberry's wife, Celeste, wrote a fundraising email for her husband. "I'm writing you today because this has become my family's story."
The investigation stems from a $30,000 donation to Fortenberry's 2016 re-election campaign from a billionaire who is not American. Under U.S. federal law, candidates for political office are prohibited from accepting campaign contributions from foreign nationals.
On October 19, a federal grand jury charged Fortenberry with "concealing information and making false statements to federal authorities who were investigating illegal contributions made by a foreign national to the congressman's 2016 re-election campaign."
Fortenberry has resigned from his House committee roles as a result of the indictment.
On the day Fortenberry was indicted, he and his wife released a letter saying that the investigation had been going on since 2018 when former President Donald Trump was in office.
Now, however, Fortenberry's wife says the investigation is an effort to "stop his work and flip his seat."
Fortenberry represents a safe Republican seat in Nebraska, despite his wife's claims that the charges are an attempt to "flip his seat." In 2020, Trump carried Fortenberry's district by a 15-point margin, according to Daily Kos Elections.
"They can't call him crazy, so they're accusing him of a fake crime," Celeste Fortenberry wrote in the fundraising appeal.
The charges Fortenberry is facing are very real.
Federal law (18 U.S. Code § 1001) holds that it is a crime to lie to, conceal information from, or otherwise mislead federal investigators. The crime is punishable by up to five years in prison.
The Department of Justice claims to have evidence that Fortenberry not only knew about the illegal contributions but orchestrated a "scheme" to conceal his guilt from investigators.
From the agency's October 19 press release:
The indictment alleges a scheme in which Fortenberry, after learning this information, "knowingly and willfully falsified, concealed, and covered up by trick, scheme, and device material facts" about the illegal campaign contributions.
As part of the scheme, Fortenberry allegedly made false and misleading statements during a March 23, 2019 interview with investigators who specifically told him it was a crime to lie to the federal government. The indictment alleges that Fortenberry falsely told investigators that he was not aware of Baaklini ever being involved in illegal campaign contributions, that the individuals who made contributions at the 2016 fundraiser were all publicly disclosed, and that he was not aware of any contributions to his campaign from a foreign national.
Fortenberry is not the first member of Congress to face such charges.
In January 2020, a federal judge in New York sentenced former Rep. Chris Collins (R-NY) to 26 months in prison and fined him $200,000 for insider trading and lying to federal investigators.
If convicted, Fortenberry is unlikely to enjoy a similar pardon from President Joe Biden.
Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.
- Indictment accuses Nebraska congressman of lying to FBI ›
- Congressman Jeff Fortenberry of Nebraska indicted for lying to FBI ... ›
- Nebraska GOP Rep. Fortenberry indicted - POLITICO ›
- Rep. Jeff Fortenberry of Nebraska Indicted in Campaign Finance ... ›
- GOP Rep. Jeff Fortenberry indicted - CNNPolitics ›
- U.S. Rep. Jeff Fortenberry Charged with Scheme to Deceive Federal ... ›
Reprinted with permission from AlternetCentrist Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin, not unlike former President Donald Trump, has been unwavering in his support of fossil fuels — which he obviously believes plays well with West Virginia voters. But the coal industry isn't as profitable in that Appalachian state as it once was.
And journalist Ella Nilsen, in an article published by CNN's website on October 21, emphasizes that coal is becoming increasingly expensive in West Virginia.
Some liberals, including economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, have been arguing that green energy would be great for West Virginia residents if Manchin and other politicians in the deep red state would give it a chance. Nilsen, similarly, points out that West Virginia's reliance on coal is becoming more and more of a hardship for residents like Charleston, West Virginia homeowner Felisha Chase — who pays more for electricity during the winter months than she spends on her mortgage.
"Coal has become more expensive than renewables or natural gas, the prices of which have fallen rapidly — and in West Virginia, the ratepayers are footing the bill," Nilsen reports. "With three of the state's major coal-fired power plants in need of hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of mandatory upgrades, costs for ratepayers like Chase will continue to go up. Coal may be a dying industry in the U.S., but Joe Manchin, a key Democratic swing vote in the Senate, isn't interested in hastening its demise."
Chase, a registered Democrat, believes that she is by no means the only West Virginia resident who finds her utility bills to be a struggle during the winter months.
Chase told CNN, "It does feel wrong when your electric bill is more than your mortgage. Around here, the old adage is 'coal keeps the lights on.' Anyone struggling to keep their electric on knows it's more than the lights…. If I'm struggling over here, I must be representative of hundreds, if not thousands, of West Virginians."
Nilsen notes that neighboring states "that were once heavily reliant on coal are moving away from it," citing Pennsylvania and Ohio as two examples of states that have — according to the New York Times — greatly reduced their reliance on coal and become more reliant on natural gas and nuclear power.
Sean O'Leary, a senior researcher at the Ohio River Valley Institute (a green energy think tank) told CNN that coal will never be as profitable as it once was.
"These plants, even if they're kept open, are going to be operating at such a low level there will be far fewer jobs and far less coal consumed than it is now," O'Leary explained. "It's as if everyone walks around utterly oblivious to that fact, and it has huge economic implications. If anything, there's a concerted effort to prevent that kind of reimagination of West Virginia as a different kind of energy state."
- Author Accuses Manchin Of 'Vile And Provable Corruption' In New ... ›
- Pandemic Is Slowing Carbon Emissions — And That's A Good Thing ... ›
- Manchin Bullies Reporter For Asking About His Coal Millions ... ›
- Coal is still king in West Virginia, but for how long? | Business ... ›
- Old King Coal: WV's coal industry struggles for stability during ... ›
- Biden's Road to Clean Energy Meets West Virginia Coal Country ›
- Life After Coal: The Decline and Rise of West Virginia Coal Country ... ›
- West Virginia coal industry grapples with impact of climate crisis ›