The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel ruled on Monday that Texas cannot exclude Planned Parenthood from its Women’s Health Program, raising fears that conservative politicians may scrap the entire program.

Yeakel — who was appointed to the bench by George W. Bush in 2003 — imposed an injunction against enforcing a law that bans state agencies from providing funds to organizations affiliated with abortion providers. Eight Planned Parenthood clinics that do not provide abortions sued the state, arguing that the law unconstitutionally restricts their freedom of speech.

In his ruling, Yeakel referenced the fact that the Department of Health and Human Services chose to cut off all of Texas’ Medicaid funding for family planning as a result of the law.

“The court is particularly influenced by the potential for immediate loss of access to necessary medical services by several thousand Texas women,” Yeakel wrote. “The record before the court at this juncture reflects uncertainty as to the continued viability of the Texas Women’s Health Program.”

After the Department of Health and Human Services cut Texas’ Medicaid funding, Texas Governor Rick Perry has promised to fund the program with the state’s own money instead. That may be a hard sell to conservative lawmakers, however, who have promised to shut down the entire Women’s Health Program if Planned Parenthood is included in it.

“We call on Governor Perry and the state to put Texan women first and set aside any vendetta they may have against Planned Parenthood,” Patricio Gonzales, CEO of Planned Parenthood Association of Hidalgo County, said after the ruling. “No woman should ever have to fear being cut off from her doctor’s care because of shortsighted political games.”

Yeakel’s injunction is only a temporary measure; he will make a final decision after presiding over a full trial. Whatever decision he makes then will likely be appealed.

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

While the emergence of yet another troubling coronavirus variant seems abrupt, it was entirely predictable — and fully anticipated here and elsewhere. More than predictable, the mutation of the virus will remain inevitable for so long as it continues to infect millions of human hosts.

Scientists don't yet know for certain whether the new "omicron" variant — so named by the World Health Organization — will prove to be substantially more infectious, transmissible or dangerous than the delta variant that became dominant last year. What they do know, however, is that sooner or later, as COVID-19 continues to spread and change, our prospects for emerging from the pandemic will dim, and millions more will die.

Keep reading... Show less

In December 1972, I was part of a nationwide campaign that came tantalizingly close to getting the U.S. Senate to reject Earl Butz, Richard Nixon's choice for secretary of agriculture.

A coalition of grassroots farmers, consumers, and scrappy public interest organizations (like the Agribusiness Accountability Project that Susan DeMarco and I then headed) teamed up with some gutsy, unabashedly progressive senators to undertake the almost impossible challenge of defeating the cabinet nominee of a president who'd just been re-elected in a landslide.

Keep reading... Show less
x
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}