The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from


Former U.S. attorney Preet Bharara had some strong words when asked about Rudy Giuliani’s insistence that Trump can pardon himself.

On CNN’s “State of the Union” Sunday morning, host Dana Bash asked Bharara — who was himself fired by Trump in yet another act of potential obstruction —  about Giuliani’s statement.

“He also just said moments ago that he agrees that the president probably does have the power to pardon himself, though he added he doesn’t think the president will do that. What is your take?” Bash asked.

“I think it would be outrageous for a sitting president of the United States to pardon —” Bharara began. “I think if the president decided he was going to pardon himself, I think it is almost self-executing impeachment.”

He went on to note that, “Whether or not there’s a minor legal argument some law professor somewhere in a legal journal to make that the president can pardon, that’s not what the framers could have intended. That’s not what the American people, I think, would be able to stand for.”

And he pointed out that Giuliani “keeps coming up with things that end up being false. So when he says the president is not contemplating something, I have no faith in that whatsoever.”

Bharara is right to question Giuliani’s assertion that Trump isn’t considering a self-pardon. Trump’s own former communications director Anthony Scaramucci confirmed that Trump talked about pardoning himself nearly a year ago. And Jay Sekulow, another member of Trump’s legal team, has also been caught lying about the subject of pardons.

Trump’s power to pardon is not unlimited. Experts note that while the Constitution doesn’t prohibit a self-pardon, such an act would be vulnerable to legal challenge. Aside from that, the pardon power explicitly only applies to federal crimes, not state crimes, and cannot be used to shield Trump from impeachment.

Trump has demonstrated his desperation to escape the Mueller investigation in the past. Thus there’s no reason to believe he wouldn’t try this last-ditch gambit.

The only real question is whether Republicans in Congress will finally stand up to him when he does.



Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Sen. Ted Cruz

A group of lawyers has submitted a 15-page ethics complaint to the State Bar of Texas demanding an investigation of Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) for his “leading role” in the far-reaching Republican effort to keep former President Trump in power despite his reelection loss.

The complaint — filed by the 65 Project, an organization of lawyers seeking to hold attorneys accountable for lending a hand in pro-Trump efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 elections — called for an examination of Cruz’s conduct in the weeks before Election Day in 2020 and on January 6, 2021, the day of the Capitol insurrection.

Keep reading... Show less

The House Select Committee, a bipartisan congressional panel looking into the Capitol insurrection, sent a letter on Thursday requesting an interview with a House Republican, Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA), who it said led a tour through parts of the Capitol complex on January 5, 2021 — the day before a pro-Trump mob stormed the halls of Congress.

In the letter to Loudermilk, the select committee’s chairman and vice-chairwoman, Reps. Bennie Thompson (D-MS) and Liz Cheney (R-WY), said the panel had seen evidence that “directly contradicts” the claim made by Republicans on the Committee on House Administration — “of which you’re a member” — that they had reviewed security footage of the days before the Capitol attack and concluded that “[t]here were no tours, no large groups, [and] no one with MAGA hats on.”

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}