The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Attorney General William Barr is one step closer to being held in contempt of Congress.

The House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday voted to advance a contempt resolution against Barr to the full House, which will vote on whether to punish Barr for defying a legally binding congressional subpoena to hand over special counsel Robert Mueller’s unredacted report and the supporting materials behind it to Congress.

The contempt resolution passed on a party-line vote of 24-16, with all Democrats voting for it and all Republicans voting against it.

It came after Trump retroactively asserted executive privilege over the Mueller report and the underlying evidence used to write it, which House Judiciary Chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) called a “clear escalation” of Trump’s obstruction of congressional investigations.

The vote was preceded by speeches from members of the House Judiciary Committee. Democrats laid out why Barr’s refusal to comply with the committee’s subpoena is a violation of the law, while Republicans spent their time spewing conspiracy theories about Hillary Clinton’s emails.

One Republican,  notorious Trump sycophant Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida, even suggested that Barr can’t be held in contempt because the economy is doing well. That, of course, is not even remotely a legal or rational argument.

It’s unclear when the full House will take up the contempt vote.

However, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi — who determines what makes it to the floor — said Wednesday she thinks Barr should be held in contempt, a clear sign she will put the contempt resolution to a full vote.

According to the federal code, a contempt of Congress charge carries a maximum fine of $1,000 and up to 12 months in prison.

Published with permission of The American Independent. 

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Stacey Abrams

Photo by Biden For President is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

File this under asked and answered. Former Georgia House minority leader and voting rights advocate Stacey Abrams trended much of the day on Wednesday after Republican Sen. John Kennedy questioned whether she thought a restrictive voting bill signed into law last month is racist. "I think there are provisions of it that are racist, yes," the former Georgia gubernatorial candidate answered. Abrams was speaking during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on voting rights on Tuesday when Kennedy made the mistake of asking her for a list of the provisions she objects to in the Georgia legislation.

Keep reading... Show less

Close