The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from Shareblue.


Every single Republican member of the House Intelligence Committee voted on Thursday to shield Trump from scrutiny, even as U.S. officials scramble to figure out what deals Trump might have promised Russian dictator Vladimir Putin during their one-on-one meeting in Helsinki, Finland.

Democrats on the committee, Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Eric Swalwell (D-CA), had moved to subpoena a U.S. translator, who was the only American witness to Trump’s private meeting with Putin.

But Republicans refused to allow the subpoena, in yet another example of the party running interference for Trump on all things Russia-related.

The ongoing mystery and confusion about the meeting has reached a new height of urgency now that the Russian government says it’s “ready for practical implementation of the agreements” Putin made with Trump. No one knows what those “agreements” are, and the White House refuses to clarify.

Trump isn’t telling anyone the details of what he agreed to with Putin — not even the Pentagon, the Washington Post reported.

The Republicans’ vote means that even senior officials within the national security community, not to mention members of Congress and American citizens, will remain completely in the dark about what happened between Trump and Putin.

White House officials are still struggling to explain why the summit was even called in the first place. It was obvious from the beginning that the U.S. had no stated goals going in, other than supposedly improving relations with Russia.

So why did Trump do it? Democrats want answers, which is why they wanted to get firsthand reporting by subpoenaing the translator who witnessed Trump’s closed-door meeting with Putin.

The latest GOP stonewalling comes as the New York Times reports that in January 2017, senior intelligence officials privately presented Trump with extensive evidence that Putin had personally ordered cyberattacks against the U.S. in an attempt to sway the 2016 elections.

Yet for nearly 18 months, Trump has constantly muddied this very clear problem in his public statements.

Trump has alternated between denying Russia played any role in attacking the U.S., and suggesting that official U.S. investigations into the matter are a “witch hunt.”

Just last week, special counsel Robert Mueller indicted 12 Russian intelligence officers and charged them with interfering in the 2016 U.S. elections. And on Monday, a Russian graduate student with ties to the National Rifle Association, which consistently supports Republicans, was charged with being a Russian spy while she studied in the U.S.

Republicans can try to keep Trump’s shady dealings with Russia a secret. But it won’t be possible for them to keep up this charade forever.

Published with permission of The American Independent. 


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning


YouTube Screenshot

In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v Wade, ending the constitutional right to an abortion after almost 50 years, some conservatives and mainstream media outlets have suggested that anti-abortionists may be willing to support more generous family welfare programs to offset the financial burden of forced birth. These suggestions, whether made in bad faith or ignorance, completely misunderstand the social function of prohibiting abortion, which is to exert control over women and all people who can get pregnant.

In adopting or replicating the right’s framing of anti-abortionists as “pro-life,” these outlets mystify the conservative movement’s history and current goals. Conservatives have sought to dismantle the United State’s limited safety net since the passage of the New Deal. Expecting the movement to reverse course now is absurd, and suggesting so serves primarily to obfuscate the economic hardship the end of Roe will inflict on people forced to carry a pregnancy to term.

Keep reading... Show less

Arizona Republican Senate candidate Blake Masters

YouTube Screenshot

Donald Trump's hand-picked candidate Blake Masters is the latest to endorse the unpopular idea.

The front-runner in the GOP primary to run for Senate in Arizona in November against Democratic incumbent Sen. Mark Kelly suggested on June 23 that Social Security should be privatized, an approach to the popular government program that experts say could jeopardize a vital financial lifeline for retired Americans.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}