The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from AlterNet.

The government of Saudi Arabia, including King Salman bin Abdulaziz al Saud and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, a.k.a. MBS, continues to deny allegations by Turkish government officials in connection with the disappearance of Saudi journalist and Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi—who was last seen entering the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul on October 2. Turkish law enforcement officials are alleging that after Khashoggi entered the Consulate, he was tortured and murdered by members of a 15-person hit squad sent from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia—and that his body was dismembered with a bone saw after the killing.

The Saudi royal family has vehemently denied any involvement in Khashoggi’s disappearance, and President Donald Trump has taken them at their word. But the New York Times has been conducting a thorough investigation of Turkish officials’ allegations, verifying the identities of nine of the 15 Saudi suspects they allege comprised a hit squad. And a team of Times reporters (including David D. Kirkpatrick, Malachy Browne, Ben Hubbard and David Botti) has documented a strong link between the suspects and the royal family.

Here are four of the most damning things revealed by the New York Times’ investigation of Turkish officials’ allegations.

1. The Saudi Government Can’t Keep Its Story Straight

After Khashoggi’s disappearance, King Salman insisted that the veteran journalist freely left the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul on October 2—although they never had a shred of proof to back up that claim. And now, the Saudi government appears to have a different story: Khashoggi was killed by mistake inside the Consulate as part of an interrogation gone wrong, and no one in the royal family authorized that interrogation. However, the Saudi men named by Turkish officials and the New York Times were hardly recent graduates from the policy academy but rather, ranged from elite members of the Saudi Royal Guard to a leading forensics doctor. Times reporters wrote that they have “confirmed independently that at least nine of 15 suspects identified by Turkish authorities worked for the Saudi security services, military or other government ministries.”

2. A Prominent Forensics Expert from Saudi Arabia Was Present in Istanbul on October 2

According to the New York Times and Turkish officials, one of the Saudi men present in Istanbul on October 2 was Dr. Salah al-Tubaig, a well-known forensics expert who specializes in autopsies—which, as Times reporters wrote, “suggests the operation may have had a lethal intent from the start.”

Further, Times reporters wrote, the presence of a forensics expert as prominent and high-ranking as Dr. al-Tubaig probably wouldn’t have been ordered by a low-level rogue agent acting independently of the royal family.

Dr. al-Tubaig heads the Saudi Scientific Council of Forensics. And as the Times noted, “Such a senior figure in the Saudi medical establishment was unlikely to join a rogue expedition organized by an underling.”

3. Suspect Maher Abdulaziz Mutreb Had Close Ties to Crown Prince Mohammed

One of the 15 men who visited Istanbul from Saudi Arabia on October 2 was Maher Abdulaziz Mutreb, a Saudi diplomat who traveled extensively with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. And the New York Times published, on October 16, a series of photos that showed the two of them together in Paris, Madrid and Boston earlier this year. The Times also published a photo of Mutreb that was taken at the Istanbul Airport on October 2 and supplied by Turkish officials.

4. Other Suspects Appear to Be Members of the Saudi Royal Guard

The New York Times has reported that the suspects identified by Turkish officials weren’t minor players in the Saudi government. Suspect Abdulaziz Mohammed al-Hawsawi, according to the Times, is an elite member of Saudi security who travels with Crown Prince Mohammed. And suspects Thaar Ghaleb al-Harbi and Mohammed Saad Alzahrani, Times reporters wrote, appear to be members of the Saudi Royal Guard—with al-Harbi having been promoted to lieutenant.

Becoming a member of the Saudi Royal Guard isn’t exactly something one achieves right after graduating from the police academy. It’s a high-ranking, elite position, and according to the Times, al-Hawsawi, al-Harbi and Alzahrani aren’t the sort of men who would be part of a low-level rogue operation.

Alex Henderson is a news writer at AlterNet and veteran political journalist. His work has also appeared in Salon, Raw Story, Truthdig, National Memo, Philadelphia Weekly, Democratic Underground, L.A. Weekly, MintPress News and many other publications. Follow him on Twitter @alexvhenderson.

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

  • 1.Why did Trump choose to hide certain specific files and not others at Mar-a-Lago? What were the criteria that Trump used to keep some files concealed and not others? Who selected those files? Did Trump consult or direct anyone in his selection of secret files? Trump was notorious for being too impatient to read his briefing papers, even after they had been drastically shortened and simplified. Is there the slightest evidence that he spirited these papers away so that he could consult or study them? Who besides Trump knew of the presence of the files he had concealed at Mar-a-Lago?
  • 2. Mar-a-Lago has an infamous reputation for being open to penetration even by foreign spies. In 2019, the FBI arrested a Chinese woman who had entered the property with electronic devices. She was convicted of trespassing, lying to the Secret Service, and sentenced and served eight-months in a federal prison, before being deported to China. Have other individuals with possible links to foreign intelligence operations been present at Mar-a-Lago?
  • 3. Did members of Trump's Secret Service detail have knowledge of his secret storage of the files at Mar-a-Lago? What was the relationship of the Secret Service detail to the FBI? Did the Secret Service, or any agent, disclose information about the files to the FBI?
  • 4. Trump's designated representatives to the National Archives are Kash Patel and John Solomon, co-conspirators in the investigations into Russian interference in the presidential election of 2016, the Ukraine missiles-for-political dirt scandal that led to the first impeachment in 2019, and the coup of 2020. Neither has any professional background in handling archival materials. Patel, a die-hard Trump loyalist whose last job in the administration was as chief of staff to the Acting Secretary of Defense, was supposedly involved in Trump’s “declassification” of some files. Patel has stated, “Trump declassified whole sets of materials in anticipation of leaving government that he thought the American public should have the right to read themselves."
  • The White House counsel failed to generate the paperwork to change the classification markings, but that doesn’t mean the information wasn’t declassified.” If Pat Cipollone, the White House legal counsel, did not “generate the paperwork,” was he or anyone on his staff aware at all of the declassifications? The White House Staff Secretary Derek Lyons resigned his post in December 2020. Did his successor, who held the position for a month, while Trump was consumed with plotting his coup, ever review the material found in Trump’s concealed files for declassification? Or did Patel review the material? Can Patel name any individual who properly reviewed the supposed declassification?
  • 5. Why did Trump keep his pardon of Roger Stone among his secret files? Was it somehow to maintain leverage over Stone? What would that leverage be? Would it involve Stone's role as a conduit with the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers during the coup? Or is there another pardon in Trump’s files for Stone, a secret pardon for his activities in the January 6th insurrection? Because of the sweeping nature of the pardon clause, pardons can remain undisclosed (until needed). Pardons are self-executing, require no justification and are not subject to court review beyond the fact of their timely execution. In other words, a court may verify the pardon was valid in time but has no power to review appropriateness. A pardon could even be oral but would need to be verifiable by a witness. Do the files contain secret pardons for Trump himself, members of his family, members of the Congress, and other co-conspirators?
  • 6.Was the FBI warrant obtained to block the imminent circulation or sale of information in the files to foreign powers? Does the affidavit of the informant at Mar-a-Lago, which has not been released, provide information about Trump’s monetization that required urgency in executing the warrant? Did Trump monetize information in any of the files? How? With whom? Any foreign power or entity? Was the Saudi payment from its sovereign wealth fund for the LIV Golf Tournament at Trump’s Bedminster Golf Club for a service that Trump rendered, an exchange of anything of value or information that was in the files? If it involved information in the files was it about nuclear programs? Was it about the nuclear program of Israel? How much exactly was the Saudi payment for the golf tournament? The Saudi sovereign wealth fund gave Jared Kushner and former Trump Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin $2 billion for their startup hedge fund, Affinity Partners. Do the Saudis regard that investment as partial payment for Trump’s transfer of nuclear information? Were Kushner or Mnuchin aware of the secret files at Mar-a-Lago?
  • 7.Did Trump destroy any of the files? If so, when? Did those files contain incriminating information? Did he destroy any files after he received the June subpoena?
  • 8.Were any of the secrets of our allies compromised? Has the U.S. government provided an inventory of breaches or potential breaches to our allies?
  • 9.Does the resort maintain a copying machine near the classified documents that Trump hid? Were any of the documents copied or scanned? Are Trump’s documents at Mar-a-Lago originals or copies? Were any copies shown or given to anyone?
  • 10.Trump’s lawyer Christina Bobb has revealed that a video surveillance system covers the places where Trump hid the files at Mar-a-Lago, and that the system is connected to a system at his other residences at the Bedminster Golf Club in New Jersey and Trump Tower in New York City. According to Bobb, Trump and members of his family observed the FBI search and seizure of his files at Mar-a-Lago, “actually able to see the whole thing” through their surveillance system. Who has that surveillance system recorded entering the rooms where the files were kept?

Kevin Bacon, right, in "The Following"

The aftermath of the August 8, 2022 search of the Mar-a-Lago club, former President Donald Trump’s Florida home, isn’t the first showdown between the FBI and a cult leader.

The Following, a 2013 Fox Pictures series, played out in similar fashion. Three seasons was enough for the producers and it’s been nine years since our introduction to Joe Carroll, English professor-novelist-serial killer, so there’s a spoiler risk -- but not enough to prevent the comparison.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}