The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Last Sunday, before the game between the Cleveland Browns and the Cincinnati Bengals, Cleveland wide receiver Andrew Hawkins walked out on the pregame field wearing a T-shirt to challenge our nation’s conscience.

The front of his shirt read, “Justice for Tamir Rice and John Crawford III.” On the back: “The real Battle of Ohio.”

I wish I could assume that everyone knows about Tamir Rice and John Crawford by now and I could just get to what happened next, but I know that’s not true. So much recent coverage of our nation’s nightmare has focused, rightfully so, on two other unarmed black males who died at the hands of police, one in a shooting in Ferguson, Missouri, and one in a chokehold in Staten Island, New York.

We’ve got a deep brew of racial tension roiling in Ohio, too. I was born and raised here and call Cleveland home. This is personal — and in the worst way, because here we are blinking fast and trying to explain how we didn’t stop the trouble we could see coming.

Some who do know about Tamir Rice and John Crawford will take issue with my use of the word “other,” as in other unarmed black males, because unlike Michael Brown and Eric Garner, Tamir and Crawford were wielding air guns. You can buy these off the shelf at Walmart, which is where Crawford was standing when he was killed in suburban Dayton. Their pellet guns were no match for police bullets. Some people like to move right past that life-altering fact as if it were just a footnote, but the gravestones tell the story.

Also, I wince every time I write “males” rather than the more human-sounding “men,” but Tamir Rice was only 12 years old when he was gunned down last month in a public park two seconds after the police car pulled up virtually next to him. He was six years from manhood, and any mother who has raised a son knows that’s a made-up milestone anyway.

After Andrew Hawkins wore that T-shirt on the field, the white lame-duck president of the Cleveland Police Patrolmen’s Association demanded an apology from the Browns, who refused.

Calling Hawkins’ protest “pathetic,” Jeff Follmer said athletes “should stick to what they know best on the field.” He doubled down in an interview with MSNBC’s Ari Melber, declaring “justified” Tamir Rice’s death, which is under investigation. He also offered this bit of advice to Americans concerned about excessive use of police force:

“How about this: Listen to police officers’ commands. Listen to what we tell you, and just stop. I think that eliminates a lot of problems.”

Follmer’s equally white successor, Steve Loomis, offered a long-winded response to Cleveland’s Scene magazine, including a review of entertainers when it comes to political skills — “incredibly under qualified” — and a likening of football players such as Hawkins to the Dixie Chicks.

With tag team precision, Follmer and Loomis delivered a double whammy of head-smacking outrage for those of us who are both white and supporters of organized labor.

A little purple-and cream-colored booklet sits next to my keyboard as I type. It’s my union father’s 1974 AFL-CIO Song Book, issued, if you can believe it, by the Department of Education. On Page 21, wedged between the songs “Joe Hill” and “You Gotta Go Down,” is the anthem of the civil rights movement, “We Shall Overcome.”

The days are long gone — decades gone — when a white guy could flash his union card and order a black man to keep his mouth shut.

So, let’s talk about that remarkable young man named Andrew Hawkins.

Hours after he wore that T-shirt, he faced a throng of news cameras and, in a soft, unscripted voice, explained to the nation why he would not be silent.

His name is Austin. He’s 2 years old.

“That little boy is my entire world,” Hawkins said Monday about his son. “And the No. 1 reason for me wearing the T-shirt was the thought of what happened to Tamir Rice happening to my little Austin” — deep breath — “scares the living hell out of me.” His voice began to break. “And my heart was broken for the parents of Tamir and John Crawford, knowing they had to live that nightmare of a reality.”

For the rest of his life — and may it be a long and glorious one — Austin Hawkins will know that his father loved him this much. A boy so certain of his father’s devotion becomes a man certain of his place in the world.

May he outlive all who would insist he just shut up.

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist and an essayist for Parade magazine. She is the author of two books, including “…and His Lovely Wife,” which chronicled the successful race of her husband, Sherrod Brown, for the U.S. Senate. To find out more about Connie Schultz ( and read her past columns, please visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at

AFP Photo/Tom Szczerbowski


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Donald Trump

Image via Twitter

A year after former President Donald Trump left the White House and Joe Biden was sworn in as president of the United States, Trump continues to have considerable influence in the Republican Party. Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a former Trump critic turned Trump sycophant, recently told Fox News that having a “working relationship” with Trump must be a litmus test for anyone in a GOP leadership role in Congress. But an NBC News poll, conducted in January 14-18, 2022, finds that many Republican voters identify as Republicans first and Trump supporters second.

Analyzing that poll in the New York Times on January 21, reporters Leah Askarinam and Blake Hounshell, explain, “Buried in a new survey published today is a fascinating nugget that suggests the Republican Party may not be as devoted to Trump as we’ve long assumed. Roughly every month for the last several years, pollsters for NBC News have asked: ‘Do you consider yourself to be more of a supporter of Donald Trump or more of a supporter of the Republican Party?’ Over most of that time, Republicans have replied that they saw themselves as Trump supporters first.”

Keep reading... Show less

Ivanka Trump, right

Image via @Huffington Post

As House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s select committee on the January 6, 2021 insurrection moves along, it is examining Ivanka Trump’s actions that day — especially the former White House senior adviser urging her father, then- President Donald Trump, to call off his supporters when the U.S. Capitol Building was under attack. This week, Ivanka Trump’s importance to the committee is examined in a column by liberal Washington Post opinion writer Greg Sargent and an article by blogger Marcy Wheeler.

Sargent notes that the committee’s “new focus on Ivanka Trump” shows that it “is developing an unexpectedly comprehensive picture of how inextricably linked the violence was to a genuine plot to thwart a legitimately elected government from taking power.”

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}