The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows

Photo by Gage Skidmore/ CC BY-SA 2.0

On CNN's State of the Union, host Jake Tapper talked with White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows about the Trump administration's latest favorite talking point: voter fraud. Specifically, voter fraud via voting by mail. In this case, Meadows came out swinging against the notion that states should send ballots to all registered voters. In perhaps the most mind-blowing exchange, Tapper (accurately) pointed out that there is no proof of "widespread voter fraud," and Meadows said, "there's no evidence that there's not, either." Then, Meadows added: "That's the definition of fraud, Jake."

How did we get there? Let's check out the now-viral Sunday morning clip below.

While already talking about voter fraud, Tapper asked Meadows to get specific, using voting by mail in Florida versus Pennsylvania as examples, as Trump, as well as First Lady Melania Trump, requested their absentee ballots to vote in Florida just last week. In fact, Trump even voted absentee for Florida's March primary.

"Can you tell me the difference between voting by mail in Florida and, say, voting by mail in Pennsylvania?" The CNN host asked Meadows on Sunday morning. "What's the difference?"

Meadows sidestepped the question, saying he wasn't familiar with Pennsylvania's system, but claimed he and Trump don't have problems with what he described as "no-excuse absentee" voting. He went on to say that he does have a problem with "sending millions of ballots across the country to sometimes empty mailboxes," noting that he doesn't want his vote to be "disenfranchised." Obviously, the word "disenfranchised" coming from the mouth of any Republican is a bold move given the systemic disenfranchisement of Black and brown voters across the nation, but the back and forth didn't jump on that particular word choice.

Meadows further suggested the "problem" is that people are "looking at just sending out ballots," using California as an example. Tapper cut in there and argued that California has already done that for the majority of its population, at about 75%, as well as Oregon, Utah, and Washington state, without problems.

"Now there are four states that are adding to the sending out ballots to every registered voter. I understand that that's a concern that you're claiming," Tapper stated.

Meadows countered this by asking Tapper, "Isn't it a concern to you?" He continued by claiming that voter rolls are "inaccurate" with "people just moving around" and, in his words, "the people that die off."

Tapper again cut off this argument, this time simply saying: "But there's no evidence of widespread voter fraud."

To which Meadows offered up the response that has now gone viral for its absolutely head-scratching, empty wordplay: "There's no evidence that there's not either. That's the definition of fraud, Jake."

Here is that clip.

Though Trump relentlessly claims that voting by mail and absentee voting are not only markedly different but that universal vote by mail would lead to the most corrupt and inaccurate election ever, no evidence supports these assertions. And in fact, voting by mail and absentee ballots are basically the same. Even still, it's a dangerous talking point in that it stews distrust in our voting system—especially during a global pandemic, where voting by mail (as well as earlier voting, more locations to vote in person, and so on) may help people in voting safely.

Trump, for example, recently went on a Twitter frenzy about Nevada's state legislature passing a bill to mail ballots to voters amid the pandemic. Trump is also relentless about dismantling the U.S. Postal Service, which can have devastating results on not just voting, but daily life for people who rely on the USPS to get medications, bills, paychecks, and other necessities.


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Sen. Bernie Sanders, left, and President Joe Biden during 2020 presidential debate

I look at September 2019 as a month where I missed something. We began with a trip to New York to do Seth Meyers’s and Dr. Oz’s shows. Why would we go on The Dr. Oz Show? For the same reason we had gone on Joe Rogan’s podcast in August: We could reach a vast audience that wasn’t paying attention to the standard political media. On Dr. Oz, Bernie could talk about Medicare for All and his own physical fitness. While at the time we believed Bernie was uncommonly healthy for his age, he was still 78. Questions would be raised related to his age, and we needed to begin building up the case that he was completely healthy and fit. It turned out to be a spectacular interview, ending with the two of them playing basketball on a makeshift court in the studio. Bernie appeared to be on top of the world.

Yet in retrospect, I should have seen Bernie growing more fatigued. After New York, with the school year starting, we did a series of rallies at colleges and universities in Iowa; this was the kickoff of our campus organizing program in the state. We would then fly to Colorado for a large rally in Denver before heading to Boulder to prep for the third debate, to take place in Houston on September 12. In Iowa, Bernie’s voice was a little hoarse. After the rally in Denver, he had completely blown it out. He sounded terrible.

Keep reading... Show less

Rep. James Clyburn

When I interviewed House Majority Whip James Clyburn in 2014 about his memoir Blessed Experiences: Genuinely Southern, Proudly Black, the South Carolina Democrat was confident in America’s ability to find its way, no matter how extreme the political swings might appear at any given time.

“The country from its inception is like the pendulum on a clock,” the congressman told me. “It goes back and forward. It tops out to the right and starts back to the left — it tops out to the left and starts back to the right.” And remember, he said, it “spends twice as much time in the center.”

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}