The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Just six months after stating on national television that being given immunity is an indicator of guilt, Michael Flynn is trying to broker immunity for himself. On Thursday night, the Wall Street Journal broke the news that Flynn has offered to answer questions before FBI, Senate and House investligators in the ongoing probe of Trump’s relationship to Russia. There’s one catch though: Flynn wants to be sure he can trade his insider knowledge for immunity from prosecution. Flynn’s lawyer, Robert Kelner, posted a statement on social media suggesting his client has tantalizing information to share, as long as nothing he says can land him behind bars.

“General Flynn certainly has a story to tell, and he very much wants to tell it,” Kelner writes in the message, piquing the interest of everyone who’s been watching this scandal factory over the last few months. The open letter goes on to state that counsel for all involved parties have been in discussion as they search for mutually agreeable terms. In the meantime, Flynn’s offer remains outstanding.

“[T]he media are awash with unfounded allegations, outrageous claims of treason, and vicious innuendo directed against him,” Kelner states. “He is now the target of unsubstantiated public demands by Members of Congress and other political critics that he be criminally investigated. No reasonable person, who has the benefit of advice from counsel, would submit to questioning in such a highly politicized, witch hunt environment without assurances against unfair prosecution.”

In September 2016, Flynn provided a hardline view on immunity, equating it with a tacit admission of guilt, at least when Hillary Clinton was the one being given immunity. “I mean, five people around her have had, have been given immunity to include her chief of staff,” Flynn told said on Meet the Press, below. “When you are given immunity, that means you have probably committed a crime.”


Flynn’s short stint in the White House ended when he resigned in February, just a month into Trump’s tenure. The Lt. General stepped down after it was revealed he’d discussed sanctions with Russia’s ambassador to the U.S., Sergey Kislyak. The partyline according to the Trump White House was that Flynn never mentioned the content of those conversations to Vice President Mike Pence. It’s unclear why Flynn would go rogue, bringing up these matters without being directed to by either Trump or Pence, but that’s their story and their sticking to it.

It’s worth noting based on this information, the Trump administration is exceptionally uninformed about the ties between its members and adversarial powers, considering that a number of its members are embroiled in similar Russia-tied scandals. That trio — Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort, policy advisor Carter Page and on-again, off-again advisor Roger Stone — have all signaled their willingness to testify before the Senate and House.

Flynn served briefly in the Obama administration before being forced out. A Wall Street Journal report notes that Flynn’s “management style could be chaotic and that the scope of his plans met resistance from both superiors and subordinates.” The article seems to suggest that Flynn’s biggest problem was his personality. Asked how he would deal with employees who didn’t enthusiastically embrace his plans, he reportedly stated he would “move them or fire them.”

Flynn revealed himself as an unabashed Islamophobe with a February 2016 tweet stating that “Fear of Muslims is RATIONAL,” and the fact that he was hired by the Trump White House. The Lt. General also promoted a tweet that read “Not anymore, Jews,” and praised a book by very vocal alt-rightie Mike Cernovich. Along with his son, he also helped add fuel to the useless fire of the fake Pizzagate scandal. You can watch him in the video enthusiastically leading a Republican National Convention chant of “Lock her up.”

This article was made possible by the readers and supporters of AlterNet.


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Donald Trump
Youtube Screenshot

Allies of former President Donald Trump have advised members of the Republican Party to cool down their inflammatory rhetoric toward the United States Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation following the execution of a search warrant at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida on Monday.

Trump supporters, right-wing pundits, and lawmakers have been whipped into a frenzy over what Trump called a "raid" by federal agents in pursuit of classified documents removed from the White House during Trump's departure from office.

Keep reading... Show less

Former President Donald Trump

Youtube Screenshot

On August 20, 2022, Donald Trump will have been gone from the White House for 19 months. But Trump, unlike other former presidents, hasn’t disappeared from the headlines by any means — and on Monday, August 8, the most prominent topic on cable news was the FBI executing a search warrant at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in South Florida. Countless Republicans, from Fox News hosts to Trump himself, have been furiously railing against the FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). And in an article published by Politico on August 11, reporters Kyle Cheney and Meridith McGraw describe the atmosphere of “paranoia” and suspicion that has become even worse in Trumpworld since the search.

“A wave of concern and even paranoia is gripping parts of Trumpworld as federal investigators tighten their grip on the former president and his inner circle,” Cheney and McGraw explain. “In the wake of news that the FBI agents executed a court-authorized search warrant at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida, Trump’s allies and aides have begun buzzing about a host of potential explanations and worries. Among those being bandied about is that the search was a pretext to fish for other incriminating evidence, that the FBI doctored evidence to support its search warrant — and then planted some incriminating materials and recording devices at Mar-a-Lago for good measure — and even that the timing of the search was meant to be a historical echo of the day President Richard Nixon resigned in 1974.”

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}