fbpx

Type to search

In Mississippi Race, Cochran Must Defend His Conservatism

McClatchy Tribune News Service Politics

In Mississippi Race, Cochran Must Defend His Conservatism

Share

By David Lightman, McClatchy Washington Bureau

ACKERMAN, MS. — In Washington, Sen. Thad Cochran is regarded as a reliable conservative.

In Mississippi, angry Republicans brand him a liberal.

As Cochran fights to win renomination in a June 24 Republican runoff against a Tea Party challenger, the race is hinging on a brutal battle over whether he’s conservative enough.

Challenger Chris McDaniel, as well as groups based outside Mississippi, are pounding away at the notion Cochran shares the political philosophy of President Barack Obama.

“In Washington, he votes with the liberals on spending, on judges, even on funding Obamacare,” charges an ad by the conservative Club for Growth Action. The group has made what it calls a “large, six-figure buy” to run the spot on state television.

On the campaign trail, McDaniel hammers away at the same theme. “For 42 years Sen. Cochran has not been the voice of conservative Mississippi,” McDaniel told a crowd at Harvey’s Restaurant in this small town near the Alabama border.

Cochran seems incredulous when discussing such charges. “It’s up to them to choose who they want to vote for,” he said of his critics. “If they think I haven’t voted conservative enough, pick out somebody who has and vote for them.”

Cut through the noise and the the question is not so much whether Cochran is conservative, but whether he’s in tune with this state’s Republicans in one of the nation’s most conservative states.

Numbers tell different stories. The American Conservative Union gives him a 78.9 lifetime rating, meaning he has voted their way roughly four out of five times since he came to the Senate in 1979.

But he’s averaged 63 since Obama took office in 2009.

Cochran’s recent scores have been “abysmal,” said Dan Schneider, ACU executive director. “It’s not just one vote, it’s a pattern,” he said, with Cochran’s fiscal votes topping the list of outrages.

The ACU’s political arm endorsed McDaniel in the June 24 Senate runoff election.

Even a 63, though, is well above liberal. The Democratic conservative average last year was 6.78.

Americans for Democratic Action, which tracks liberal voting, gave Cochran a 20 percent “liberal quotient” in 2012, its most recent rating.

Cochran said he’s operated as best he can in a Senate where getting it all is impossible. He defended his spending decisions as crucial to his impoverished state, and makes his defense of that spending the linchpin of his campaign.

To many fed up with Washington, such talk is little more than making excuses.

“I’m looking at this massive debt, and Cochran voted to increase the debt,” said Dannie Reed, an Ackerman activist. “It seems like he’s not even trying to cut the budget.”

McDaniel relishes igniting that spark.

“It’s extreme that he would pander to liberal Democrats in a Republican primary because he knows he cannot count on the votes of conservatives,” McDaniel told supporters in Starkville last week.

Cochran and his backers scoff at such talk.

“Conservative leaders in Mississippi are standing beside Senator Cochran,” said Lt. Gov. Tate Reeves. He ticked off a long list, including Gov. Phil Bryant and former Gov. Haley Barbour.

But to staunch conservatives, Cochran’s record has two big shortcomings.

One involves his long ago votes on judges. Cochran in 1993 and 1994 voted to confirm Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer, President Bill Clinton’s Supreme Court nominees. He was hardly alone; Ginsburg got 96 votes and Breyer, 87.

Cochran did vote against both Obama Supreme Court nominees.

His opponents’ other complaint involve recent spending and debt votes.

Cochran backed the 2011 deal that raised the debt ceiling and the 2013 pact to end the government shutdown. In December, he opposed the two-year budget compromise, which lifted some spending restrictions, but a month later voted, along with many other Republicans, for a current year spending plan that adhered to those levels.

Republican Party leaders argue that in each instance they won concessions. The 2011 agreement cut anticipated spending $917 billion over 10 years, and triggered automatic spending cuts, or sequester, if a special congressional committee could not agree on further reductions. The plan got 74 votes.

To end last year’s federal government shutdown, Republicans had demanded an end to the Affordable Care Act. They got a small concession, that the government confirm eligibility of those getting federal aid under the health-care law.

Schneider thought Cochran’s seeming moderation evolved because of his status as a senior member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, which has a big role in crafting federal spending plans. If Cochran returns to the Senate next year, and Republicans control the Senate, he’s likely to chair the committee.

Cochran is unapologetic about his fiscal record. His campaign is a daily tour of projects whose funding he helped secure. When asked about his debt ceiling votes, he and his backers say matter of factly that he did the best he could.

“Just look at the record, and you’ll see what he’s done for this state,” said State Rep. Rita Martinson, a Madison Republican.

Few dispute that. But they also see all that debt, and all that gridlock, and are in no mood for nuances.

“I like small government,” said Phyllis Guysinger, a Hattiesburg retiree, “and I don’t like that he’s voted for things I can’t support.”

AFP Photo/Jonathan Ernst

Tags:

12 Comments

  1. FireBaron June 16, 2014

    One of these days, voters will be educated enough that they are no longer voting for simple parochial interests, but, instead, are looking at the big picture of the country as a whole.

    Reply
    1. Sand_Cat June 16, 2014

      The voters in this case are looking at the country as a whole: they want the whole country to be run by ignorant (and proud of it), racist neo-Confederates.

      Reply
  2. FT66 June 16, 2014

    Unfortunately, the old man is going to lose to McDaniel next Tuesday, and Tea Party will claim that they are now in full swing to take out all incumbents, (of which is not the case, just riding on the loss of Eric Cantor). Once McDaniel wins, he will for sure be sent back where he came from come Nov. That am quite sure of.

    Reply
    1. Pamby50 June 16, 2014

      I wish but I see the Tea Party doing to Travis Childers what they are doing to Cochran. He lost his seat because he was painted as a liberal in cahoots with Nancy Pelosi.

      Reply
  3. howa4x June 16, 2014

    Maybe McDaniel can start cutting the budget to his own state. Miss gets $3.07 for every dollar they send to DC. Maybe Miss. should get 61. like NJ. Now that’s cutting the budget. He can go back home and stay tighten your belts everyone I just cut our taxes and your federal funding. That will go over well I’m sure. I wonder if the fact that Mississippi has the lowest test scores in the county has anything to do with how they vote?

    Reply
    1. ps0rjl June 16, 2014

      Perhaps you don’t understand how the tea party works? Remember the tea party woman who held up a sign saying ‘Don’t touch my Medicare”? And please don’t use math on these people as Mississippi has one of the worst school systems in the country. (sarcasm). Seriously though I agree with you. Let’s quit giving them all the extra federal dollars they keep getting. Those tea party folks keep hollering about liberals in Washington throwing away federal dollars but most of them come from states where they get more money from the federal government than they send in.

      Reply
      1. Sand_Cat June 16, 2014

        And all that money doesn’t seem to be doing much good in MS and the other red states, either.

        Reply
        1. Dominick Vila June 18, 2014

          The only person conservative enough for these people is David Duke.

          Reply
      2. Dominick Vila June 18, 2014

        Their decisions are neither ideological nor logical. What drives the so-called “conservatives” in the South involve issues such as race, religion, abortion, gay marriage, and gun control.
        The malign social programs because people they hate are eligible to benefit from those programs, not because they don’t like them or because they don’t use them, which they do.

        Reply
  4. Sand_Cat June 16, 2014

    Let’s call them as they are: the “staunch conservatives” you cite in Mississippi are ignorant (and proud of it!), racist neo-Confederates at best

    Reply
  5. Sandy99 June 16, 2014

    The majority of the white Mississippians who will be voting Tuesday, June 24, will choose the guy who gets support from people who put up billboards that acknowledge “President” Jefferson Davis’ birthday, think that Abraham Lincoln is a war criminal and the Emancipation Proclamation is an illegal document. The state is also a big ole government tit sucker (but hates gubment) and somehow fails to comprehend this fact. Most of the rest of the world has stepped into the 21st century — we are going back to the 19th.

    Reply
  6. silas1898 June 17, 2014

    Deep in the heart of stupid.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.