The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

KIROV, Russia (AFP) – A Russian court on Friday unexpectedly freed protest leader Alexei Navalny pending his appeal against a five-year sentence on embezzlement charges, after his jailing prompted thousands to take to the streets in protest.

The judge in the northern city of Kirov ruled that keeping President Vladimir Putin’s top opponent in custody would deprive Navalny of his right to stand in mayoral elections in Moscow on September 8.

“What happened now is a completely unique phenomenon in the system of Russian justice,” said Navalny, who was immediately set free from the glass-fronted defendants’ cage and rushed to embrace his wife Yulia.

A lower court in the city of Kirov 900 kilometers (560 miles) northeast of Moscow had on Thursday sentenced Navalny to five years in a penal colony.

Navalny, who is a lawyer by training, was found guilty of defrauding the local government in the Kirov region of 16 million rubles ($500,000, 376,000 euros) in a timber deal while acting as an unpaid advisor to the local authorities in 2009.

Navalny’s co-accused, Pyotr Ofitserov, who was sentenced to four years in prison, was also released on Friday pending his appeal.

The sentence has thrown up another bone of contention between Moscow and Washington, with President Barack Obama due to visit Russia for the September 5-6 G20 summit in St Petersburg.

Activists said the conviction was ordered by the Kremlin to punish Navalny for daring to challenge Putin, and late Thursday thousands of his supporters rallied in Moscow and Saint Petersburg in unexpectedly large protests.

The guilty verdict disqualifies Navalny from politics, but the restriction will come into force only if the verdict is upheld on appeal, giving him time to launch a credible campaign for the powerful and visible post of Moscow mayor.

Many observers say the jailing of a high-profile mayoral candidate during the campaign was a huge embarrassment for the authorities and link the prosecutors’ decision to appeal to a possible change of heart by the Kremlin.

Legal experts said the decision to release Navalny was unprecedented and clearly politically-motivated. “That has never happened before,” lawyer Dmitry Agranovsky told AFP.

The judge in his ruling on Friday said that Navalny’s jailing would “limit his right to be elected” and put him at a disadvantage compared to other mayoral candidates.

Navalny said he was not a “pet kitten or puppy” who could be first “kicked out of the elections” and then invited back.

He said he would decide upon his return to Moscow if he would continue his campaign or boycott the polls, where he was due to challenge pro-Putin incumbent Mayor Sergei Sobyanin.

More than 200 people were arrested after several thousand people rallied near the Kremlin walls in Moscow to protest Navalny’s sentencing. All have now been freed with caution.

The Moscow municipality shut down Red Square, ostensibly for “repairs”, in an apparent bid to prevent protests on the iconic Moscow landmark.

Police said that 2,500 people took to the streets in the Russian capital, while activists put the turnout at 10,000 and higher, with protests continuing into the early hours of Friday. A similar demonstration also took place in Saint Petersburg.

Navalny, who emerged as a powerful new force in mass protests in 2011-2012, said he wants to challenge Putin in the next presidential election in 2018. He has vowed to jail Putin if he comes to power.

Observers said the harsh punishment meted out to Navalny was a warning to other dissenters not to challenge Putin.

“He needs to be in jail because that is a lesson to the people of Russia: keep silent,” mass-daily Moskovsky Komsomolets said on its front-page.

The decision to jail the 37-year-old father of two also prompted global concern and risks further straining ties between Moscow and the West.

“Navalny’s harsh prison sentence is the latest example of a disturbing trend of government actions aimed at suppressing dissent in civil society in Russia,” White House spokesman Jay Carney said.

Obama and Putin agreed in June to hold a separate summit on September 3-4, just before the G20 talks, but White House officials have been coy about whether that meeting was still scheduled.

Washington is already furious over the almost month-long stay in a Moscow airport of intelligence leaker Edward Snowden, who has now applied for asylum in Russia.

The New York Times said Obama could now cancel the bilateral summit but Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Friday the Kremlin was still preparing for Obama’s visit to Moscow.

Photo Credit: AFP/ Yevgeny Feldman

From Your Site Articles

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

The privilege of beholding the corals of Belize, the second largest reef system on earth, is a complete marvel that can never be taken for granted. The school of nine squid in perfect alignment that stared at us like transparent sentinels ,the green barracuda that floated as if in suspended animation, looking for prey. Those moments of utter awe were soul transformative not only for a child, but also for parents nurturing a young human to the ultimate reason to exist on this earth, to care for life.

Over the next few years, a battle was waged between environmentalists and those who saw dollars in the form of oil extraction in the reef. Thankfully on December 1, 2015, right after the Cop21 Paris Climate Accord, Belize made the tremendous decision to ban drilling outright -- and is working hard to restore coral. The same cannot be said for many other fragile parts of the world particularly the warming Arctic, where Russia has a near stranglehold of more than half the Arctic Ocean.

Keep reading... Show less
Youtube Screenshot

The saturation of the ranks of our police forces with far-right extremists is one of the harsh realities of American life that bubbled up during the police brutality protests of 2020 and was laid bare by the January 6 insurrection. The presence of these extremists not only is a serious security and enforcement threat—particularly when it comes to dealing with far-right violence—but has created a toxic breach between our communities and the people they hire to protect and serve them. Too often, as in Portland, the resulting police culture has bred a hostility to their communities that expresses itself in biased enforcement and a stubborn unaccountability.

Much of this originates in police training, which are the foundations of cop culture. And a recent Reuters investigative report has found that police training in America is riddled with extremists: Their survey of police training firms—35 in all—that provide training to American police authorities found five of them employ (and in some cases, are operated by) men whose politics are unmistakably of the far-right extremist variety. And these five people alone are responsible for training hundreds of American cops every year.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}