Tag: america first
'Groyper' Republicans: Neo-Nazi Infestation Of GOP Keeps Getting Worse

'Groyper' Republicans: Neo-Nazi Infestation Of GOP Keeps Getting Worse

College Republicans of America, a network of right-wing clubs with more than 280 chapters, recently named Kai Schwemmer the new political director.

Schwemmer will play a vital role in directing the organization, which has contributed to the GOP’s leadership and ideology pipeline. And his new role has additional significance because, as a devotee of neo-Nazi podcaster Nick Fuentes, it hints at the future of an increasingly bigoted Republican Party.

The GOP’s affiliation with antisemitism and racism is nothing new. The party has been knee-deep in bigoted politics since at least the 1960s—and since President Donald Trump became the party’s leader in 2016, the right has more openly embraced this kind of hate.

In addition to this news from College Republicans, GOP candidates have been seeking out Fuentes for his blessing. For instance, Florida gubernatorial candidate James Fishback—who has been dogged by reports of sexual misconduct—has Fuentes’ support in his campaign.

Fuentes’ involvement in national politics goes back to the infamous 2017 “Unite the Right” neo-Nazi rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, which featured prominent chants of “Jews will not replace us” and eventually led to the killing of counter-protester Heather Heyer. Fuentes was among the crowd that Trump referred to as “very fine people.”

He’s also the host of a white nationalist podcast—whose devoted followers call themselves “groypers”—where he advocates for extreme right-wing politics, stemming from his desire to make the United States a white nation where nonwhite immigrants are removed.

Fuentes is a promoter of antisemitic conspiracy theories, including the false allegation that the Holocaust is a hoax.

On his podcast, Fuentes has discussed his admiration for Adolf Hitler, who he said was “cool,” argued that women should be imprisoned, expressed his desire for an American dictatorship, and spoken out in support of pedophilia—including saying that he wanted a “16-year-old wife.”

Because of his extremist views, Fuentes has already been a public headache for top Republicans. In 2022, he was a dinner guest at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago property—along with fellow antisemite Kanye West—generating worldwide headlines.

After he was criticized by Fuentes for being a part of an interracial marriage, Vice President JD Vance said that Fuentes “can eat shit.”

But Fuentes, who backed Trump’s presidential campaigns, has also criticized his policies, expressing anger at Trump’s war on Iran and arguing that it breaks from the so-called “America First” ideology.

He’s also complained that Trump hasn’t deported enough people, saying, “I’m criticizing Trump because there’s not enough deportations, there’s not enough ICE brutality, there’s not enough National Guard.”

“My problem with Trump isn’t that he’s Hitler—my problem with Trump is that he is not Hitler,” Fuentes said.

The influence that media personalities have over the GOP cannot be underemphasized.

For decades, Republicans marched in lockstep with racist radio host Rush Limbaugh, who hosted leaders like former President George W. Bush on his show. And two Republican presidents, Ronald Reagan and Trump, rose to prominence in the party after careers in media.

Overall, Fuentes’ toxic, extreme worldview has not been a hindrance—he’s the future of a party that just continues to be more and more hateful.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

Trump And Rubio Using HIV Treatment Program To Extort Poor Countries

Trump And Rubio Using HIV Treatment Program To Extort Poor Countries

Trump administration officials apparently felt that shuttering the U.S. Agency for International Development and killing billions of dollars in foreign aid was too subtle and failed to convey the real depths of their depravity. So the president’s lackeys figured out a way to make their monstrous intentions crystal clear.

A State Department memorandum prepared for Secretary Marco Rubio pitched the genuinely horrifying idea that the U.S. should threaten to withhold funds for HIV treatment in Zambia, where 1.3 million people require daily HIV medications. For good measure, why not also threaten to cut funding for tuberculosis and malaria medications?

This is all in service of forcing Zambia to give us better access to the copper, lithium, and cobalt minerals within its borders. It’s tough to get much more direct than telling a country that President Donald Trump has no problem whatsoever with letting people die if he doesn’t get his way.Zambia isn’t alone here. Indeed, this sort of thing is now standard operating procedure for the Trump administration, which has already forced at least 17 African countries to sign similar agreements. Those countries will all get far less aid than they received under previous administrations, and also have to agree to increase their own health care spending substantially.

These “deals” are not really deals, as none of the countries that are being pressed into this can effectively negotiate when their health care funding needs are so dire. And countries aren’t just needing to agree to the bad bargain of getting less U.S. aid while simultaneously somehow finding more of their own money to spend: They also have to agree to give the United States all patient record data and prioritize using faith-based health care providers.

This is part of the Trump administration’s America First Global Health Strategy. The “strategy” is simply that the only thing that really matters is the health of Americans, and therefore we need patient data from all these countries to help us detect disease outbreaks sooner.

Given that the Department of Health and Human Services is run by nightmarish ghouls who don’t believe in disease but do believe in eugenics, this explanation doesn’t really hang together. That’s because it isn’t the actual reason we want the data.

The move is intended to force all of these countries to share all pathogen data they collect with U.S. health companies first, giving them first crack at developing vaccines and other treatments before any non-U.S. competitors

And if that wasn’t bad enough, what if, for some countries, the State Department just threw in some non-health-related demands too?

Nigeria, for example, needs to agree to the crummy health care deal, yet also agree to address what Trump alleges is the persecution of Christians in the country.

And there’s Zambia, which can’t get the abysmal funding offered by the administration—less than 50% of what it used to receive—unless it signs a deal to let American businesses get more access to their mineral deposits

The memo isn’t shy about this tradeoff.

“We will only secure our priorities by demonstrating willingness to publicly take support away from Zambia on a massive scale,” it reads.

Imagine thinking this was a good and noble way to act. Imagine thinking it was a good idea to write this down.It isn’t even really possible to determine how many people the Trump administration has killed with all of these aid cuts. Worldwide, at least 200,000 more children under the age of 5 were projected to die in 2025 versus the previous year. Cuts to international food aid have created an entirely avoidable hunger crisis. A study published in The Lancet last month projects that the foreign aid cuts could result in at least 9.4 million more deaths by 2030. About 2.5 million of those will be kids under 5.

We’ll likely never know exactly how many deaths Elon Musk and Trump caused with their efforts to root out “waste” and “fraud.” But there’s no question that it’s an unbelievably high and terrible number—and that the Trump administration shows no signs of stopping.

Toddler Trump Goes To War, With No Concern For The Consequences

Toddler Trump Goes To War, With No Concern For The Consequences

We are now six days into Trump’s war on Iran, and his team is still trying to figure out the reason. We started with regime change, but Trump quickly decided that he might be okay with leaving someone from the current government in charge.

Then he went with the need to keep Iran from having nuclear weapons. That one didn’t work very well either since he was still boasting about having obliterated Iran’s nuclear weapons program in his attacks last summer.

Team Trump then shifted to the need to strike preemptively. This story went that Israel was about to attack, and we knew that if Israel attacked Iran would retaliate against U.S. forces in the region. Therefore, we had to attack first, along with Israel.

That one may be closest to reality, but it does put Trump in the embarrassing position of admitting that he allowed Netanyahu to drag the United States into a war that doesn’t make much sense from the standpoint of the United States. As Marjorie Taylor Greene and other MAGA stalwarts are pointing out, this is not very America First!

War Without Warning or Planning

Trump not only lacked a reason to go to war; it seems his team didn’t bother to do any planning. Three days after the war began and Iran started sending drones and missiles around the Middle East, it suddenly occurred to Team Trump that they should try to evacuate U.S. citizens from the region.

That is likely a good idea, but the sort of thing competent governments plan before they go to war. It is truly amazing that Trump apparently was completely unprepared for what was almost a certain outcome of his war.

It is worth comparing this failure to the problems associated with Biden’s withdrawal from Afghanistan. Biden managed to get almost 130,000 people out of Afghanistan as the regime we had supported there was collapsing. This was a very impressive accomplishment. These were people who had worked with the U.S. military. Their lives and the lives of their family members would be endangered if they were not able to get out of the country. There were 13 U.S. soldiers who will killed in a terrorist incident near the airport from which most people were being evacuated.

That was a tragic event, but in the larger context, the withdrawal went remarkably smoothly given the extraordinary circumstances. And just to be clear, it was Trump who put Biden in this situation, having already negotiated a withdrawal with the Taliban before Biden came into office. Nonetheless, news outlets like the New York Times, Washington Post, and National Public Radio felt obligated to refer to the withdrawal as “disastrous” when referring to it in their news stories for the rest of his presidency.

It will be interesting to see how they refer to this incredible mess-up by the Trump administration. Presumably Trump knew in advance that war was likely. The State Department could have issued warnings to U.S. citizens in the region. They also should have developed contingency plans to withdraw people once the war started, recognizing that it was likely airports in the region would be closed.

None of this happened. Now they are in the situation of telling hundreds of thousands of U.S. citizens you’re on your own in trying to make travel arrangements to get to safety in the middle of a war zone. The level of incompetence is orders of magnitude greater than any failures by the Biden administration in the Afghanistan withdrawal.

The United States Screws Its Former Allies

When George W. Bush attacked Iraq in 2003, he made his plans very clear to U.S. allies, and in fact to the whole world. The attack may have been unjustified, but it was not a secret to anyone. The same was true of his father’s attack on Iraq in the first Gulf War. In both cases U.S. allies knew what to expect well in advance and could plan accordingly.

That is not the case with Trump’s war on Iran. The U.S. was apparently unprepared for Iran’s military response and so are U.S. allies. This is a huge deal for East Asian countries that are heavily dependent on oil from the region and European countries that badly need liquid natural gas from the Persian Gulf countries, especially as they have mostly cut imports from Russia. The jump in the price of oil and natural gas is yet another shock to these countries’ economies, after the earlier shock from the Trump tariffs.

If it wasn’t already completely clear, with the exception of Israel, none of the United States’ traditional allies can count on the United States support, either militarily or economically. The Trump administration is at best indifferent, if not outright hostile, to countries that are committed to democracy and the rule of law.

The fact that a blockage of the Straits of Hormuz might be a serious economic hit to much of the world seems to have not weighed into Trump’s decision to go to war at all. If the blockage is only for a few days, the impact will end up being limited, but if it lasts for months, the hit will be comparable or even larger than the impact of the sanctions most rich countries imposed on Russian oil and gas after the invasion of Ukraine.

As far as whether the blockage of the Straits is likely to continue for long, part will depend on Iran’s ability to fire missiles and drones, but part will depend on Trump’s decision as to whether to continue the war or seek a negotiated settlement. On that point, he is again playing reality TV show host, telling the world to stay tuned and we’ll see what he feels like.

One positive outcome from this war is that it should further accelerate the shift to clean energy. Now that the world recognizes how fragile its access to traditional fossil fuels is, it has become a huge natural security matter for them to quickly shift to sources of energy that can’t be turned off. It was already the case that renewable energy accounted for the vast majority of new energy being added in most countries, even the United States. But the war should prompt countries to accelerate the pace at which they add wind and solar, allowing them to retire facilities relying on fossil fuels.

The same story applies with electric vehicles. They already account for the bulk of vehicle sales in China and some other markets. This is in large part because they are as cheap as gas-powered vehicles to buy, and much cheaper to operate. Countries are likely now to push quickly to get towards 100% electric vehicles among new sales and replacing many of the older gas-fueled cars still on the road.

Those of us in the United States who lived through Donald Trump’s first presidency know that he is not a person who thinks carefully about his actions and their long-term consequences. Trump began to demonstrate this point to the world clearly with his hare-brained tariff scheme where he sought to punish countries for trading with us. This war without reason removes any doubt that Trump is a threat to world peace and economic stability. The world needs to move away from any dependence on the United States as quickly as possible and now they all know this.

Dean Baker is a senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research and the author of the 2016 book Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer. Please consider subscribing to his Substack.

Reprinted with permission from Dean Baker.

Greene Stokes MAGA's 'America First' Outrage Over Trump's Iran Strikes

Greene Stokes MAGA's 'America First' Outrage Over Trump's Iran Strikes

When former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) announced that she was resigning from Congress, she wasn't shy about expressing her disappointment with President Donald Trump — who, in her view, has betrayed his America First agenda with an aggressively interventionist foreign policy. Now, the MAGA Republican and former Trump ally is vehemently criticizing Trump's military strikes against Iran. And she isn't the only person in the MAGA movement who wants Trump to stay out of that country.

Washington Post reporters Emily Davies and Hannah Knowles, in an article published on March 1, explain, "President Donald Trump's major attack on Iran has rattled parts of the coalition that twice delivered him the White House, a fracture that could spell trouble for a divided GOP as the midterm elections approach. The strikes, which killed Iran's supreme leader, followed a visible buildup of U.S. forces in the Middle East. But Trump's decision to carry them out nonetheless surprised some of his supporters, who had expected the self-described anti-interventionist president to stop short of a direct attack."

Greene attacked Trump's Iran policy in a lengthy March 1 rant on X, formerly Twitter.

The far-right congresswomen tweeted, "We said 'No More Foreign Wars, No More Regime Change!' We said it on rally stage after rally stage, speech after speech. Trump, Vance, basically the entire admin campaigned on it and promised to put America FIRST and Make America Great Again. My generation has been let down, abused, and used by our government our entire adult lives and our children's generation is literally being abandoned. Thousands and thousands of Americans from my generation have been killed and injured in never ending pointless foreign wars and we said no more. But we are freeing the Iranian people. Please."

Greene continued, "There are 93 million people in Iran, let them liberate themselves. But Iran is on the verge of having nuclear weapons. Yeah sure. We have been spoon fed that line for decades and Trump told us all that his bombing this past summer completely wiped it all out. It’s always a lie and it’s always America Last. But it feels like the worst betrayal this time because it comes from the very man and the admin who we all believed was different and said no more."

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is praising Trump's Iran operation. But MAGA Republican Blake Neff, known for producing The Charlie Kirk Show, expressed strong reservations about the Iran strikes.

In a February 28 post on X, Neff wrote, "Charlie was opposed to a regime-change war with Iran, as was I. Wars by their nature are expensive and unpredictable. They endanger American lives and can last far, far longer than anyone anticipates. Nevertheless, President Trump has elected for regime change in Iran. As an American patriot I must hope for the best. Trump's instinct is to avoid prolonged fighting and boots on the ground. We must simply trust that he has a strategy that will prevent both."

Neff continued, "Right now some of my right-leaning friends are messaging me: 'F*** this.' 'This is extremely depressing.' 'Never voting in a national election again'…. If this war is a swift, easy, and decisive victory, most of them will get over it. But if the war is anything else, there will be a lot of anger."

Davies and Knowles note, however, that so far, "MAGA allies long skeptical of foreign intervention" have "largely stuck by the president."

"Trump officials cast the strikes on Iran last summer as a limited intervention meant to take out a nuclear threat — and pushback within his coalition faded as the conflict ended without morphing into a broader war," the Post reporters observe. "But each conflict has threatened more entanglement abroad than the last, testing the movement's tolerance.

Natalie Winters, a co-host for Steve Bannon's War Room podcast, believes that Trump needs to do a better job explaining the Iran strikes to his MAGA base.

Winters told the Post, "The messaging, much like the Epstein files, is all over the place. I would think they would know their base better. Some of his donors are probably happy so congratulations to them."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World