Tag: bill essayli
Without Evidence, GOP Prosecutor Incites Right-Wing Media Over 'Election Fraud'

Without Evidence, GOP Prosecutor Incites Right-Wing Media Over 'Election Fraud'

First Assistant” U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli is on a right-wing media tour claiming to have evidence of election fraud in California that will lead to prosecutions soon. Essayli is encouraging people to send in tips to help the Department of Justice investigate the supposed election rigging. Essayli's comments have right-wing media outlets in a frenzy pushing unverified claims of fraud.

Essayli is a Trump appointee currently leading the Central District of California federal prosecutors’ office despite not having received Senate confirmation. Once Essayli reached the term limit for his initial post of interim U.S. attorney, then-Attorney General Pam Bondi appointed him a “first assistant” attorney, essentially granting him the leadership role in the Los Angeles office without confirmation. According to the Los Angeles Times, Essayli has “struggled to achieve courtroom victories,” particularly in cases against protestors.

Since California held its primary elections on June 2, the Trump administration and Republican Party have led a surge of claims of voter fraud and election rigging by the Democrats. As CNN noted, there has been no evidence to back up such claims. But Essayli has begun a media tour maintaining that individuals will be prosecuted for voter fraud.

Three days after the primary elections, Essayli was interviewed on CNN's The Story Is, where he claimed, “Absolutely, there is evidence that people are cheating, 100 percent,” adding, “There will be charges. I'm not prepared to announce them yet.”

Essayli cited a story about a single woman who was caught offering money to homeless individuals to register to vote “at false addresses” but admitted “we don't know” if election fraud is widespread or if it would affect the outcome of an election. Essayli uses this prosecution of one woman as his concrete evidence of election fraud in most of his interviews.

Also on June 5, Essayli appeared on Fox News' Fox News @ Night, asserting that “you'll never find” fraud “if you don't look for it.” Fox host Trace Gallagher said that he hasn't heard of evidence of widespread fraud, but “it is hard to believe that something, somewhere is not happening.”

Essayli also did an interview with Salem News Channel's The Scott Jennings Show the same day, repeating the same claims.

In an appearance on The Glenn Beck Program on June 8, Essayli asserted, “We do have multiple ongoing investigations … regarding election fraud,” and complained that the California voter rolls are “dirty” because noncitizens may be included. Noncitizen voting is extremely rare and statistically insignificant.

He also told Beck, “I expect people will be charged, but we need a wide-scale audit of the California voter roll,” and plugged his office's official tip line email, saying, “We are looking for any sort of wide-scale conspiracy, if you will. Right now, I would say our investigations lean more into individual actors.”

On the same day, Essayli did an interview on WABC's Cats & Cosby radio show, claiming California's voter registration process allows noncitizens to vote and suggesting that the voter rolls are full of noneligible voters.

“You've got all these ridiculous things that do not prove that you are an eligible United States citizen who can vote in an election,” he said of the documents California allows people to provide to show their residence.

Again, Essayli claimed, “Will we be charging people with fraud? Yes, we will,” and then pushed for an audit of the voter rolls.

Essayli repeated the claims of fraud and intention to prosecute during an interview on The Charlie Kirk Show, where co-host Blake Neff said “we absolutely need to find” actual fraud but “it doesn't matter if there's no fraud in this case because they've done everything they can to make it look as shady as possible.”

On June 8 alone, Essayli also appeared on One America News Network's Real America, NewsNation's Cuomo, and Fox News' The Ingraham Angle, repeating the same claims. Essayli plugged his tip line on Ingraham, saying if “people have witnessed anything, any specific conduct of fraud,” they should provide evidence, and adding, “I don't think a republic can survive if the people don't have faith in the systems.”

Essayli's push to prosecute has been picked up by other right-wing media outlets. Gateway Pundit called it an “explosive update” and claimed “a suspicious late 'ballot dump' delivered thousands of votes to far-left candidates” in Los Angeles. Salem Media site RedState published an article touting Essayli’s efforts and claiming about election fraud, “The problem is more widespread than the politicians want to admit, yet they are still blocking the SAVE America Act.” The Daily Caller and The Daily Wire have also reported on Essayli's comments.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters

Trump's Stooge: Tainted Federal Prosecutor Stirs California Election Conspiracies

Trump's Stooge: Tainted Federal Prosecutor Stirs California Election Conspiracies

There he goes again. As Democrats predicted before the first votes were in, President Donald Trump is, as is his way, challenging the results of the elections in California. With absolutely no evidence of wrongdoing, he took to Truth Social twice on Wednesday.

"The Dumocrats are at it again! They are trying to STEAL THE GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA PRIMARY, AND THE MAYOR OF LOS ANGELES, PRIMARY, AWAY FROM TWO GREAT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES. Here we go with the very late and massive numbers of MAIL IN BALLOTS," Trump posted

"There's BIG cheating by the Dumocrats in California. Votes are all tied up. May not be in for weeks. Under investigation by the U.S. Attorney's Office in Los Angeles. Why the vote counting DELAY???"

Trump knows exactly why the delay. It's because the state relies heavily on mail-in ballots, which must be postmarked by election day but may not arrive until days after. And then they are hand-counted, with signatures verified and corrected if necessary. It's part of making sure that as many people participate as possible, and that every vote is counted. Another word for it is democracy.

You'd think that if Democrats were stealing the Governor's and Mayor's race, they'd be doing a more effective job of it; in fact, Trump's favored candidates are doing better than expected. But there is a method to Trump's madness: the popular theory, backed up by some practical evidence, that late-deciding mail-in ballots tend to break Democratic and progressive.

Four years ago, Rick Caruso, the popular developer, held a comfortable lead over Karen Bass on the morning after the election, only to see their positions reversed by the late ballots. Does that mean that Spencer Pratt and Steve Hilton, the TV hosts turned politicians, will lose their spots in the run-off? Probably not. But the feds are ready to prosecute, just in case.

More troubling than Trump's social media rants are the actions actually being taken by his ardent loyalist, who is the "first assistant U.S. Attorney" for the Central District of California — a loophole method of having a non-confirmed and non-confirmable appointee run the office. First Assistant U.S. Atty. Bill Essayli, on Friday morning, said his office "has multiple election fraud investigations underway," in coordination with the FBI in Los Angeles. Essayli's office confirmed that Assistant U.S. Atty. Robert Renner was at a Los Angeles County ballot processing center Friday "to observe the vote counting process."

Essayli's office has earned the reputation, under his "leadership," of losing. He has distinguished himself for his vigor in pursuing the Trump agenda, prosecuting protestors, immigrants and activists, with surprisingly little success. There is an old expression that a good prosecutor can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich. Essayli and his lieutenants are not, by that standard, very good prosecutors.

The judges of the Central District could select a new U.S. Attorney to fill the vacancy in the Central District, but they haven't moved to do so. One explanation is that they are simply letting Essayli and his team fall on their faces. Meghan Blanco, a former federal prosecutor and veteran defense attorney, suggested to the Los Angeles Times that the federal judges' inaction with Essayli might be a clever act of resistance. "If you're a judge and displeased with what DOJ is doing and the shenanigans they're pulling ... you let the Essayli appointment play out," Blanco said. "No one has seen a U.S. attorney's office lose the way this office is losing now."

Opening investigations to suit the president's partisan whims is the secret to success in the Trump justice system. It is what won Bill Pulte, the housing chief who, based on his willingness to scour the mortgage applications of Trump's enemies, the spot of Director of National Intelligence. It is all that Trump values, and it is a terrible abuse of power. In prior times, presidents could face impeachment for such abuses. In this world, we have come to accept it as business as usual. It should not be.

Susan Estrich is a celebrated feminist legal scholar, the first female president of the Harvard Law Review, and the first woman to run a U.S. presidential campaign. She has written eight books.


Conflict Over Pretti Killing Is Latest Clash Between Trump White House And Gun Lobby

Conflict Over Pretti Killing Is Latest Clash Between Trump White House And Gun Lobby

After U.S. Border Patrol agents fatally shot Minneapolis protester Alex Pretti last Saturday, federal officials described him as a "domestic terrorist" and "would-be assassin" who "wanted to do maximum damage and massacre law enforcement." But the only evidence to support those characterizations was the fact that Pretti was carrying a concealed handgun, which he was legally allowed to do.

Although videos of the incident show Pretti never drew that weapon, let alone threatened the agents with it, several officials portrayed his exercise of the constitutional right to bear arms as inherently suspicious. That position provoked criticism from leading gun rights groups — the latest example of disagreements between Second Amendment advocates and an administration that claims to support their cause.

Pretti "approached US Border Patrol officers with a 9 mm semi-automatic handgun," the Department of Homeland Security said on Saturday, neglecting to mention that the agents did not see the holstered gun until after they tackled Pretti. "The officers attempted to disarm (him) but the armed suspect violently resisted," DHS added, omitting the fact that an agent had removed the gun by the time the shooting started.

FBI Director Kash Patel erroneously claimed Pretti's possession of a handgun was illegal. "You cannot bring a firearm, loaded, with multiple magazines, to any sort of protest that you want," Patel said. "It's that simple. You don't have a right to break the law."

Bill Essayli, the first assistant U.S. attorney for the Central District of California, went even further. "If you approach law enforcement with a gun, there is a high likelihood they will be legally justified in shooting you," he averred. "Don't do it!"

That was too much for Gun Owners of America, which condemned Essayli's "untoward comments," noting that "the Second Amendment protects Americans' right to bear arms while protesting — a right the federal government must not infringe upon." The National Rifle Association also was perturbed, calling the prosecutor's statement "dangerous and wrong."

President Donald Trump did not explicitly say that Pretti invited his own death by carrying a gun, but he did portray that conduct as troubling. "I don't like any shooting," he told The Wall Street Journal. "But I don't like it when somebody goes into a protest and he's got a very powerful, fully loaded gun with two magazines."

According to Pretti's ex-wife, the Journal notes, he "had carried a gun for several years," exercising a right recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court, the state of Minnesota and local licensing authorities, which had issued him a carry permit. In this context, there was nothing necessarily nefarious about his decision to carry a gun the day he was killed.

As the GOA's comments reflect, conservatives traditionally have prized the more specific right to carry guns at political protests, such as demonstrations against the restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Left-leaning gun control advocates, meanwhile, have condemned that practice and supported bans on it.

Given this history, it is not surprising that gun rights groups usually allied with Trump rebelled at the notion that carrying a firearm is threatening, illegal or an invitation to police violence. Nor is it surprising that they were alarmed when Justice Department officials considered a ban on gun possession by transgender people.

While that half-baked proposal seems to have gone nowhere, the Trump administration is actively defending the federal ban on gun possession by people convicted of nonviolent felonies. The NRA and other Second Amendment groups, by contrast, say that policy is blatantly unconstitutional.

The Trump administration is also defending a federal law that treats cannabis consumers as felons if they own guns, even if they live in states that have legalized marijuana. The NRA has called that policy "unjust."

Trump is avowedly committed to "protecting Second Amendment rights," and his Justice Department recently launched a litigation project for that purpose. But as the government's defense of the Pretti shooting confirms, those promises are less reliable thanthey seem.

Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at Reason magazine and the author of Beyond Control: Drug Prohibition, Gun Regulation, and the Search for Sensible Alternatives (Prometheus Books).Follow him on X: @JacobSullum.

Reprinted with permission from Creators


Trump Prosecutors Drop Criminal Charges Against Favored Donor (Again)

Trump Prosecutors Drop Criminal Charges Against Favored Donor (Again)

Rich criminals sure are enjoying a heyday in President Donald Trump’s second term. The latest person to benefit from the Trump administration’s approach of rewarding big donors—who also happen to be major criminals—is Andrew Wiederhorn, chair of FAT Brands.

On Wednesday, federal prosecutors in Los Angeles dropped two criminal cases against the fast food mogul. Was it newly discovered evidence that accounted for Wiederhorn’s good fortune? Heavens, no. It was what gets people off the hook these days: being a Trump donor.

Acting U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California Bill Essayli is overseeing this particular travesty. Essayli has been on a similar employment journey to his equally unqualified compatriot on the East Coast, New Jersey's acting US Attorney Alina Habba.

And just like Habba, Essayli is clinging to his gig by appeasing Trump—which means treating his donors favorably.Wiederhorn had been charged under the Biden administration for concealing $47 million in income and, in a separate case, possessing a gun despite being a convicted felon. He also allegedly forgave himself about $65 million in loans. The Internal Revenue Service spent 15 years trying to collect back taxes from Wiederhorn, who owed more than $7 million by March 2021.

Having a company that was found guilty of criminal tax fraud and other companies that were fined $364 million in civil fraud, and being personally convicted of 34 felonies for falsifying business records, Trump was always going to inexorably let financial felons off the hook.

Indeed, that’s been a major feature of the first few months of Trump’s second term, where pardons and other favors have been doled out to people like reality TV grifters Todd and Julie Chrisley; Virginia sheriff and bribe enthusiast Scott Jenkins; Nevada’s worst politician, Michele Fiore, who stole from a fund honoring a slain police officer to pay for plastic surgery; and crypto bro Justin Sun.

Now Trump’s corruption is benefiting Essayli, who has used his office to charge politicians and judges who are perceived to be thwarting Trump’s agenda.

It’s always a good sign when the top law enforcement officer of a major metropolitan area uses his job to harass political opponents.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World