Tag: chuck grassley
Kash Patel's Misuse Of FBI Jet And Funds Now Under Bipartisan Senate Probe

Kash Patel's Misuse Of FBI Jet And Funds Now Under Bipartisan Senate Probe

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) is finally questioning the dozens of reports that officials in President Donald Trump's administration are using government resources for personal reasons.

According to MS NOW reporter Ken Dilanian, Grassley wants information about Kash Patel's personal use of the FBI plane and the recent decision to purchase BMW SUVs for the FBI. But those only scratch the surface of Patel's use of taxpayer dollars to fund his personal adventures. Patel has used government money for helicopter tours and jet ski excursions, said a whistleblower report given to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

During the first Trump administration, two Cabinet officials were forced out after their personal use of government planes and helicopters. Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price and Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke were both ousted after reports revealed they used the government aircraft for trips home, horseback riding with the vice president and even vacations. In Zinke's case, he spent $14,000 in taxpayer dollars to use a helicopter instead of driving two hours.

Unlike other Cabinet officials, the FBI director is required by policy to use the FBI jet for safety reasons. In this case, however, Grassley wants an accounting of the aircraft's use to conduct his own “independent and objective review.”

At the same time, Grassley has asked: “Please explain why you decided to purchase BMW vehicles instead of Chevy Suburbans.” General Motors is an American company, while BMW is German, though both the Suburban and the BMW SUV are manufactured in the U.S. It has been a longstanding policy that the government purchases vehicles from American companies.

When asked for documents about the purchase at the time, Patel refused.

Democrats Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) and Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL) said in their own letter that they “appreciate Chairman Grassley raising these concerns, which mirror those raised repeatedly by House and Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats.”

Their letter references a VIP snorkeling trip in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, an excursion that was first reported by the AP and confirmed by the FBI as “a historical tour to honor heroes who died."

“Your VIP snorkeling experience in Hawaii was not an isolated incident,” Raskin and Durbin wrote. “You frequently demand special perks on ‘official’ trips around the globe, such as a taxpayer-funded helicopter tour during your multi-country jaunt across East Asia and other recreational activities like jet skiing.”

The letter continues, “Your jet-setting and the lack of justification for these trips are ‘out of control,’ and the new attaché office you established in Wellington, New Zealand, may have been opened in part to justify a sightseeing trip you took there.”

After his Hawaii trip, Patel went to Australia and New Zealand before hopping over to Italy to watch the U.S. men's hockey team win the gold medal at the Olympics. He was filmed chugging a beer in the locker room celebration. His outings also include flying to see his country singer girlfriend perform, attending hockey games and UFC events.

According to the Democrats, a source said Patel “demoted personnel in Brussels because they failed to ensure you were adequately entertained, stoking fear among rank-and-file agents that they must provide your demanded perks or face termination. Concerns and strains prompted by the prioritization of your personal entertainment on international trips may have led to the resignation of the head of the FBI’s international operations this year.”

The FBI focuses exclusively on domestic issues, though there are 64 overseas Legal Attaché locations.

The Democrats go on to say that a source told them Patel was overheard bragging in a field office "If you have golf, hockey, fishing, or hunting and beautiful sights, you’re going to see a lot of me."

“This is not the conduct of a committed and faithful public servant, especially one entrusted with ensuring the safety of almost 350 million Americans,” the Democrats wrote.

The letter continued: “Your lack of judiciousness regarding your personal travel and dubious use of official travel appear to violate not only government ethics law and Department of Justice policy, but also White House directives.”

“Despite its myriad failures and hypocrisies on this point, the Trump administration has expressly promised Americans that it would crack down on waste, fraud, and abuse of government spending and has reportedly directed officials to limit their travel, particularly overseas travel or travel unrelated to the President’s agenda," the Democrats' letter added.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet


How Do We Make Billionaires Pay Their Fair Share Of Taxes? Beef Up The IRS

How Do We Make Billionaires Pay Their Fair Share Of Taxes? Beef Up The IRS

"The rich should pay their fair share of taxes." Who can argue with that? But then we must decide who is rich and what is meant by fair. Neither political party has distinguished itself in making such distinctions.

But Republicans play an especially outrageous game in portraying the Internal Revenue Service as the working stiff's enemy. For salaried workers, taxes come straight out of paychecks, meaning most are already paying what they owe. Owners of small businesses have more deductions at their disposal, but the neighborhood bakery that tries to follow the rules doesn't have much to fear.

When Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act funded the hiring of about 15,000 IRS employees, however, Republicans played the public for boobs. "Are they (the IRS) going to have a strike force that goes in with AK-15s already loaded, ready to shoot some small-business person in Iowa?" Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Iowa Republican, asked on Fox News.

In reality, criminal investigation special agents go only after serious tax cheats, and just 2,000 of them are armed. These cases involve destroying records, double-bookkeeping and the like. They aren't persecuting taxpayers whose math was innocently off or were even negligent.

And so to address Grassley's complaint: If some small business person in Iowa is engaged in money laundering, narcotics trafficking or major league fraud, then yes, armed IRS agents may come to visit.

The IRS employed about 102,000 people at the beginning of Donald Trump's second term. Staffing has been cut down to about 74,000. Not only are there fewer agents going after tax dodgers, but there are also fewer customer support workers able to answer ordinary people's tax questions.

The chief beneficiaries of lax tax enforcement are the rich who employ squads of accountants to hide income or manufacture unlawful deductions. The tax code already favors them. For example, capital-gains taxes — which are paid after selling stock or other assets — can pay taxes at a lower rate than wages. That's why Meta magnate Mark Zuckerberg has himself paid a salary of only a dollar a year. He is lavishly compensated through a cargo-ship-sized pile of securities and other assets taxed at the lower capital-gains rate.

There are reasons for treating capital gains differently from earned income, but must the tax advantage for the former be so big?

Democrats crusading for more tax "fairness" have this foolish habit of targeting their own rich residents. The proposal in Democratic-controlled California to slap a one-time five percent tax on everything a billionaire owns is nuts. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom wisely opposes this utterly complicated scheme, which it seems would force some Californians to add up the value of their vintage watches, boats and paintings for tax purposes. New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, meanwhile, weaves myriad proposals for raising taxes in ways that would seep deep into the middle class.

What the California and New York tax proposals have in common is providing an incentive for the rich to move elsewhere. It's not like these places don't already tax the top incomes. Many very rich people have continued to live in these jurisdictions for their economic vitality, schools, cultural institutions and other amenities. And they pay almost all the income taxes.

But they have limits. It's one thing to tax them. It's another to portray taxing them as a means of punishment. Tax reform that closes loopholes and special deals benefiting the super-rich much be done at the national level.

The IRS doesn't make tax laws. It is federal agency that collects taxes and enforces the laws. Middle-income and "merely affluent" Americans should recognize this: The taxes that the richest among us don't pay are taxes that they pay.

Froma Harrop is an award winning journalist who covers politics, economics and culture. She has worked on the Reuters business desk, edited economics reports for The New York Times News Service and served on the Providence Journal editorial board.

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

Chuck Grassley

Grassley Warns Against 'Strong' Democratic Minority In Senate

Even though President Donald Trump was elected to a second term with Republican majorities in both chambers of Congress and is fulfilling his campaign promises, one high-ranking Senate Republican isn't so sure that Democratic opposition has been quelled.

Politico's Eugene Daniels recently interviewed Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), one of Trump's biggest supporters and the longest-serving sitting U.S. senator. The 91 year-old Republican also chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, which will be ground zero for many of Trump's wish-list items like immigration crackdowns and Supreme Court appointments.

Daniels asked Grassley how confident he felt about his ability to shepherd Trump's legislative agenda through his committee, given his party's recent victory in November. Grassley pushed back, saying that the GOP "ought to be cautious about what appears to be disarray in the Democratic Party." He opined that his own party was more fractured and prone to infighting than the Democratic caucus.

"I think they have the ability to reunify and get back. They’re going to be a strong minority. They don’t look like it today on January 22, but I’ll bet January 22 of 2026, it’ll be a whole different show," Grassley said. "It’ll take them a while to get there, but we can’t take anything for granted that we’re going to have a weak Democratic Party."

While Republicans enjoy a 53-47 majority in the Senate, they're still short of the 60 votes needed to bypass filibusters. This limits Republicans to having to rely on the budget reconciliation process, in which legislation can pass with 51 votes provided it deals with strictly budgetary matters. But even that isn't a sure thing, given that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth needed a tie-breaking vote from Vice President JD Vance to get confirmed after three Republicans — including former Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) — voted against him. Just four Republican defections could sink a judicial appointment, a Cabinet confirmation, or a reconciliation bill.

"They have the ability to sing off the same song sheet," Grassley said of Democrats. "That’s something Republicans are very bad about. I mean, it may not appear to you today that it’s that bad of a situation for Republicans. But I’m telling you, Democrats are more unified and on the same message. It may not appear today, but they’ll get back there and get back fast."

In the 2026 midterm election, Democrats are defending 13 seats, while Republicans will attempt to keep 20 of their own. Outside of Sens. Jon Ossoff (D-GA) and Gary Peters (D-MI), the Democrats vying for another six-year term are from relatively safe blue states. However, four Republicans — Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME), Joni Ernst (R-IA), Roger Marshall (R-KS) and Thom Tillis (R-NC) — may face competitive opponents in both the Republican primary and the general election. Democrats could reclaim control of the Senate by flipping three of those four seats.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Chuck Grassley

'Flip-Flop Fest': Republicans Whine After Garland Names Hunter Biden Special Counsel

Republicans expressing outrage after Attorney General Merrick Garland on Friday elevated the Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney investigating Hunter Biden to special counsel status are now being mocked and chastised after it was revealed they have been demanding the Attorney General appoint a special counsel to investigate Hunter Biden for over a year.

“Half of the House Republican conference wrote to Merrick Garland last year asking him to appoint a special counsel in the Hunter Biden case. Now that he’s done it they are acting mad,” wrote Aaron Fritschner, deputy chief of staff for Rep. Don Beyer (D-VA).

Fritschner pointed to this letter to Garland from April, 2022, signed by nearly 100 House Republicans, demanding he appoint a special counsel.

“We believe that in the case of Hunter Biden a Special Counsel must be appointed to preserve the integrity of this investigation and any subsequent prosecution. A Special Counsel would also ensure there is no bias in the investigation or undue influence from the White House,” the Republicans wrote.

Doing so, they insisted, would “help restore” some “trust for the American people…in government institutions.”

For example, among the House Republicans who signed the April 2022 letter demanding a special counsel, is Rep. Alex Mooney (R-WV), who on Friday, responding to a report about the elevation of David Weiss to special counsel status, wrote: “The Biden Justice Department is trying to stonewall congressional oversight. All this while the House Oversight Committee has put fourth mounting evidence of President Joe Biden’s role in his family’s schemes.”

The ridicule of Republicans came quickly.

Fritschner blasted U.S. Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Ron Johnson (R-WI):

Talking Points Memo founder Josh Marshall, pointing to Fritschner’s comments, responded: “Friends don’t let friend[s] try to appease Republicans.”

Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-FL), known for his sarcastic and scathing remarks ridiculing Republicans during House committee hearings, ridiculed the entire House GOP Friday afternoon. After pointing to a post from February they made demanding a special counsel, he suggested they might need treatment for amnesia.


Fritschner blasted Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Ron Johnson (R-WI):



That social media post from the House GOP included a letter from Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan blasting Garland for not appointing a special counsel.


National security attorney Brad Moss slammed Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) for demanding a special counsel be appointed, only to complain when one was.

Norman Ornstein, the political scientist and emeritus scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, responded, adding: “Chuck Grassley has long been an embarrassment to the Senate and clearly seems to have been privy to the attempt to steal the election. He needs to resign.”

Indeed, Sen. Grassley was one of 33 GOP Senators who, in September, not only demanded Garland appoint a special counsel, but demanded David Weiss be granted special counsel status.

“Under Department of Justice regulations and federal law, you have the power to provide special counsel authorities and protections to U.S. Attorney Weiss. Given that the investigation involves the President’s son, we believe it is important to provide U.S. Attorney Weiss with special counsel authorities and protections to allow him to investigate an appropriate scope of potentially criminal conduct, avoid the appearance of impropriety, and provide additional assurances to the American people that the Hunter Biden investigation is free from political influence,” the GOP Senators wrote.

Read the tweets above or at this link.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World